Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Karoline Heiwolt
dblp:243/7249
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Geometric modeling and processing · 67% Image and video processing · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Geometric modeling and processing
shape matching |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Statistical shape representations for temporal registration of plant components in 3D · ICRA 2023 |
Geometric modeling and processing
shape representation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Statistical shape representations for temporal registration of plant components in 3D · ICRA 2023 |
Image and video processing › image sequence processing
temporal alignment |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Statistical shape representations for temporal registration of plant components in 3D · ICRA 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
principal component analysis · 0.73d contour extraction · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Statistical shape representations for temporal registration of plant components in 3DabstractPlants are dynamic organisms and understanding temporal variations in vegetation is an essential problem for robots in the wild. However, associating repeated 3D scans of plants across time is challenging. A key step in this process is re-identifying and tracking the same individual plant components over time. Previously, this has been achieved by comparing their global spatial or topological location. In this work, we demonstrate how using shape features improves temporal organ matching. We present a landmark-free shape compression algorithm, which allows for the extraction of 3D shape features of leaves, characterises leaf shape and curvature efficiently in few parameters, and makes the association of individual leaves in feature space possible. The approach combines 3D contour extraction and further compression using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to produce a shape space encoding, which is entirely learned from data and retains information about edge contours and 3D curvature. Our evaluation on temporal scan sequences of tomato plants shows, that incorporating shape features improves temporal leaf-matching. A combination of shape, location, and rotation information proves most informative for recognition of leaves over time and yields a true positive rate of 75%, a 15% improvement on sate-of-the-art methods. This is essential for robotic crop monitoring, which enables whole-of-lifecycle phenotyping. Karoline Heiwolt, A. Cengiz Öztireli, Grzegorz Cielniak |
ICRA | 1 |