Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shahriar Noroozizadeh
dblp:243/7733
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 77% Deep learning architectures and training · 23% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Forecasting Clinical Risk from Textual Time Series: Structuring Narratives for Temporal AI in Healthcare · AAAI 2026 |
Medical and health informatics › clinical prediction
clinical risk prediction |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Forecasting Clinical Risk from Textual Time Series: Structuring Narratives for Temporal AI in Healthcare · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | Forecasting Clinical Risk from Textual Time Series: Structuring Narratives for Temporal AI in Healthcare · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fine-tuned decoder models · 2.0encoder-based transformers · 2.0LLM-assisted annotation · 2.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Forecasting Clinical Risk from Textual Time Series: Structuring Narratives for Temporal AI in HealthcareabstractClinical case reports encode temporal patient trajectories that are often underexploited by traditional machine learning methods relying on structured data. In this work, we introduce the forecasting problem from textual time series, where timestamped clinical findings—extracted via an LLM-assisted annotation pipeline—serve as the primary input for prediction. We systematically evaluate a diverse suite of models, including fine-tuned decoder-based large language models and encoder-based transformers, on tasks of event occurrence prediction, temporal ordering, and survival analysis. Our experiments reveal that encoder-based models consistently achieve higher F1 scores and superior temporal concordance for short- and long-horizon event forecasting, while fine-tuned masking approaches enhance ranking performance. In contrast, instruction-tuned decoder models demonstrate a relative advantage in survival analysis, especially in early prognosis settings. Our sensitivity analyses further demonstrate the importance of time ordering, which requires clinical time series construction, as compared to text ordering, the format of the text inputs that LLMs are classically trained on. This highlights the additional benefit that can be ascertained from time-ordered corpora, with implications for temporal tasks in the era of widespread LLM use. Shahriar Noroozizadeh, Sayantan Kumar, Jeremy C. Weiss |
AAAI | 1 |