Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniil Selikhanovych

dblp:243/8927 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8789-5924ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 6 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
6 papers
Generative modeling · 65% Optimization for machine learning · 23% Efficient and distributed learning · 12%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 86% Computational complexity · 14%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visual content generation and editing · 50% Geometric modeling and processing · 50%

Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network
2.132024
Adversarial Schrödinger Bridge Matching · NeurIPS 2024
Kernel Neural Optimal Transport · ICLR 2023
Neural Optimal Transport · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimal transport
neural optimal transport
2.032023
Extremal Domain Translation with Neural Optimal Transport · NeurIPS 2023
Kernel Neural Optimal Transport · ICLR 2023
Neural Optimal Transport · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
1.932025
Inverse Bridge Matching Distillation · ICML 2025
Adversarial Schrödinger Bridge Matching · NeurIPS 2024
A3D: Does Diffusion Dream about 3D Alignment? · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
domain translation
1.422024
Adversarial Schrödinger Bridge Matching · NeurIPS 2024
Extremal Domain Translation with Neural Optimal Transport · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network › image-to-image translation
unsupervised image-to-image translation
1.422024
Adversarial Schrödinger Bridge Matching · NeurIPS 2024
Extremal Domain Translation with Neural Optimal Transport · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimal transport
1.322023
Kernel Neural Optimal Transport · ICLR 2023
Neural Optimal Transport · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion bridge
0.912025
Inverse Bridge Matching Distillation · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distillation
0.912025
Inverse Bridge Matching Distillation · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.912025
Inverse Bridge Matching Distillation · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network
denoising diffusion GAN
0.812024
Adversarial Schrödinger Bridge Matching · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
schrödinger bridge
0.812024
Adversarial Schrödinger Bridge Matching · NeurIPS 2024
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization
0.822019
Optimal Tensor Methods in Smooth Convex and Uniformly ConvexOptimization · COLT 2019
Near Optimal Methods for Minimizing Convex Functions with Lipschitz $p$-th Derivatives · COLT 2019
Mathematical optimization › convergence analysis
iteration complexity
0.822019
Optimal Tensor Methods in Smooth Convex and Uniformly ConvexOptimization · COLT 2019
Near Optimal Methods for Minimizing Convex Functions with Lipschitz $p$-th Derivatives · COLT 2019
Mathematical optimization
tensor methods
0.822019
Optimal Tensor Methods in Smooth Convex and Uniformly ConvexOptimization · COLT 2019
Near Optimal Methods for Minimizing Convex Functions with Lipschitz $p$-th Derivatives · COLT 2019
Computational complexity
lower bounds
0.412019
Near Optimal Methods for Minimizing Convex Functions with Lipschitz $p$-th Derivatives · COLT 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

score distillation · 1.7latent space optimization · 1.7optimal transport · 1.3one-step generator · 0.9inverse bridge matching · 0.9tensor methods · 0.8discrete-time markovian fitting · 0.8adversarial training · 0.8neural optimal transport · 0.7neural network · 0.7kernel methods · 0.7numerical study · 0.4higher-order derivative oracle · 0.4acceleration · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 A3D: Does Diffusion Dream about 3D Alignment?
abstract
We tackle the problem of text-driven 3D generation from a geometry alignment perspective. Given a set of text prompts, we aim to generate a collection of objects with semantically corresponding parts aligned across them. Recent methods based on Score Distillation have succeeded in distilling the knowledge from 2D diffusion models to high-quality representations of the 3D objects. These methods handle multiple text queries separately, and therefore the resulting objects have a high variability in object pose and structure. However, in some applications, such as 3D asset design, it may be desirable to obtain a set of objects aligned with each other. In order to achieve the alignment of the corresponding parts of the generated objects, we propose to embed these objects into a common latent space and optimize the continuous transitions between these objects. We enforce two kinds of properties of these transitions: smoothness of the transition and plausibility of the intermediate objects along the transition. We demonstrate that both of these properties are essential for good alignment. We provide several practical scenarios that benefit from alignment between the objects, including 3D editing and object hybridization, and experimentally demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.
Savva Ignatyev, Nina Konovalova, Daniil Selikhanovych, Oleg Voynov, Nikolay Patakin, Ilya Olkov, Dmitry Senushkin, Alexey Artemov, Anton Konushin, Alexander Filippov, Peter Wonka, Evgeny Burnaev
ICLR3
2025 Inverse Bridge Matching Distillation
abstract
Learning diffusion bridge models is easy; making them fast and practical is an art. Diffusion bridge models (DBMs) are a promising extension of diffusion models for applications in image-to-image translation. However, like many modern diffusion and flow models, DBMs suffer from the problem of slow inference. To address it, we propose a novel distillation technique based on the inverse bridge matching formulation and derive the tractable objective to solve it in practice. Unlike previously developed DBM distillation techniques, the proposed method can distill both conditional and unconditional types of DBMs, distill models in a one-step generator, and use only the corrupted images for training. We evaluate our approach for both conditional and unconditional types of bridge matching on a wide set of setups, including super-resolution, JPEG restoration, sketch-to-image, and other tasks, and show that our distillation technique allows us to accelerate the inference of DBMs from 4x to 100x and even provide better generation quality than used teacher model depending on particular setup. We provide the code at https://github.com/ngushchin/IBMD
Nikita Gushchin, David Li 0004, Daniil Selikhanovych, Evgeny Burnaev, Dmitry Baranchuk, Alexander Korotin
ICML3
2024 Adversarial Schrödinger Bridge Matching
abstract
The Schrödinger Bridge (SB) problem offers a powerful framework for combining optimal transport and diffusion models. A promising recent approach to solve the SB problem is the Iterative Markovian Fitting (IMF) procedure, which alternates between Markovian and reciprocal projections of continuous-time stochastic processes. However, the model built by the IMF procedure has a long inference time due to using many steps of numerical solvers for stochastic differential equations. To address this limitation, we propose a novel Discrete-time IMF (D-IMF) procedure in which learning of stochastic processes is replaced by learning just a few transition probabilities in discrete time. Its great advantage is that in practice it can be naturally implemented using the Denoising Diffusion GAN (DD-GAN), an already well-established adversarial generative modeling technique. We show that our D-IMF procedure can provide the same quality of unpaired domain translation as the IMF, using only several generation steps instead of hundreds.
Nikita Gushchin, Daniil Selikhanovych, Sergei Kholkin, Evgeny Burnaev, Alexander Korotin
NeurIPS2
2023 Neural Optimal Transport
Alexander Korotin, Daniil Selikhanovych, Evgeny Burnaev
ICLR2
2023 Kernel Neural Optimal Transport
Alexander Korotin, Daniil Selikhanovych, Evgeny Burnaev
ICLR2
2023 Extremal Domain Translation with Neural Optimal Transport
abstract
In many unpaired image domain translation problems, e.g., style transfer or super-resolution, it is important to keep the translated image similar to its respective input image. We propose the extremal transport (ET) which is a mathematical formalization of the theoretically best possible unpaired translation between a pair of domains w.r.t. the given similarity function. Inspired by the recent advances in neural optimal transport (OT), we propose a scalable algorithm to approximate ET maps as a limit of partial OT maps. We test our algorithm on toy examples and on the unpaired image-to-image translation task. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/milenagazdieva/ExtremalNeuralOptimalTransport
Milena Gazdieva, Alexander Korotin, Daniil Selikhanovych, Evgeny Burnaev
NeurIPS3
2019 Near Optimal Methods for Minimizing Convex Functions with Lipschitz $p$-th Derivatives
abstract
In this merged paper, we consider the problem of minimizing a convex function with Lipschitz-continuous $p$-th order derivatives. Given an oracle which when queried at a point returns the first $p$-derivatives of the function at that point we provide some methods which compute an $\e$ approximate minimizer in $O\left(\e^{-\frac{2}{3p+1}} \right)$ iterations. These methods match known lower bounds up to polylogarithmic factors for constant $p$.
Alexander V. Gasnikov, Pavel E. Dvurechensky, Eduard Gorbunov, Evgeniya A. Vorontsova, Daniil Selikhanovych, César A. Uribe, Bo Jiang 0007, Shuzhong Zhang, Sébastien Bubeck, Qijia Jiang, Yin Tat Lee, Yuanzhi Li, Aaron Sidford
COLT5
2019 Optimal Tensor Methods in Smooth Convex and Uniformly ConvexOptimization
abstract
We consider convex optimization problems with the objective function having Lipshitz-continuous $p$-th order derivative, where $p\geq 1$. We propose a new tensor method, which closes the gap between the lower $\Omega\left(\e^{-\frac{2}{3p+1}} \right)$ and upper $O\left(\e^{-\frac{1}{p+1}} \right)$ iteration complexity bounds for this class of optimization problems. We also consider uniformly convex functions, and show how the proposed method can be accelerated under this additional assumption. Moreover, we introduce a $p$-th order condition number which naturally arises in the complexity analysis of tensor methods under this assumption. Finally, we make a numerical study of the proposed optimal method and show that in practice it is faster than the best known accelerated tensor method. We also compare the performance of tensor methods for $p=2$ and $p=3$ and show that the 3rd-order method is superior to the 2nd-order method in practice.
Alexander V. Gasnikov, Pavel E. Dvurechensky, Eduard Gorbunov, Evgeniya A. Vorontsova, Daniil Selikhanovych, César A. Uribe
COLT5