Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Akshay Iyer

dblp:244/2203 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 80% Learning theory · 20%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference
0.812024
Continuous Treatment Effect Estimation Using Gradient Interpolation and Kernel Smoothing · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal effect estimation › treatment effect estimation
continuous treatment effect estimation
0.812024
Continuous Treatment Effect Estimation Using Gradient Interpolation and Kernel Smoothing · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process
0.812024
Continuous Treatment Effect Estimation Using Gradient Interpolation and Kernel Smoothing · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Learning theory › nonparametric regression
kernel regression
0.812024
Continuous Treatment Effect Estimation Using Gradient Interpolation and Kernel Smoothing · AAAI 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal effect estimation
treatment effect estimation
0.812024
Continuous Treatment Effect Estimation Using Gradient Interpolation and Kernel Smoothing · AAAI 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

kernel smoothing · 0.8gradient interpolation · 0.8gaussian process · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Continuous Treatment Effect Estimation Using Gradient Interpolation and Kernel Smoothing
abstract
We address the Individualized continuous treatment effect (ICTE) estimation problem where we predict the effect of any continuous valued treatment on an individual using ob- servational data. The main challenge in this estimation task is the potential confounding of treatment assignment with in- dividual’s covariates in the training data, whereas during in- ference ICTE requires prediction on independently sampled treatments. In contrast to prior work that relied on regularizers or unstable GAN training, we advocate the direct approach of augmenting training individuals with independently sam- pled treatments and inferred counterfactual outcomes. We in- fer counterfactual outcomes using a two-pronged strategy: a Gradient Interpolation for close-to-observed treatments, and a Gaussian Process based Kernel Smoothing which allows us to down weigh high variance inferences. We evaluate our method on five benchmarks and show that our method out- performs six state-of-the-art methods on the counterfactual estimation error. We analyze the superior performance of our method by showing that (1) our inferred counterfactual re- sponses are more accurate, and (2) adding them to the train- ing data reduces the distributional distance between the con- founded training distribution and test distribution where treat- ment is independent of covariates. Our proposed method is model-agnostic and we show that it improves ICTE accuracy of several existing models.
Lokesh Nagalapatti, Akshay Iyer, Abir De, Sunita Sarawagi
AAAI2