Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Babak Rahmani
dblp:244/2401
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 68% Representation and self-supervised learning · 22% Efficient and distributed learning · 10% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Implicit Language Models are RNNs: Balancing Parallelization and Expressivity · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
state space model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Implicit Language Models are RNNs: Balancing Parallelization and Expressivity · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
information bottleneck |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Natural image synthesis for the retina with variational information bottleneck representation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Natural image synthesis for the retina with variational information bottleneck representation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
parallelization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Implicit Language Models are RNNs: Balancing Parallelization and Expressivity · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational inference · 1.1gaussian process · 1.1convolutional neural network · 1.1implicit models · 0.9fixed-point iteration · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Implicit Language Models are RNNs: Balancing Parallelization and ExpressivityabstractState-space models (SSMs) and transformers dominate the language modeling landscape. However, they are constrained to a lower computational complexity than classical recurrent neural networks (RNNs), limiting their expressivity. In contrast, RNNs lack parallelization during training, raising fundamental questions about the trade off between parallelization and expressivity. We propose implicit SSMs, which iterate a transformation until convergence to a fixed point. Theoretically, we show that implicit SSMs implement the non-linear state-transitions of RNNs. Empirically, we find that only approximate fixed-point convergence suffices, enabling the design of a scalable training curriculum that largely retains parallelization, with full convergence required only for a small subset of tokens. Our approach demonstrates superior state-tracking capabilities on regular languages, surpassing transformers and SSMs. We further scale implicit SSMs to natural language reasoning tasks and pretraining of large-scale language models up to 1.3B parameters on 207B tokens - representing, to our knowledge, the largest implicit model trained to date. Notably, our implicit models outperform their explicit counterparts on standard benchmarks. Our code is publicly available at github.com/microsoft/implicit_languagemodels Mark Schöne, Babak Rahmani, Heiner Kremer, Fabian Falck, Hitesh Ballani, Jannes Gladrow |
ICML | 2 |
| 2022 | Natural image synthesis for the retina with variational information bottleneck representationabstractIn the early visual system, high dimensional natural stimuli are encoded into the trains of neuronal spikes that transmit the information to the brain to produce perception. However, is all the visual scene information required to explain the neuronal responses? In this work, we search for answers to this question by developing a joint model of the natural visual input and neuronal responses using the Information Bottleneck (IB) framework that can represent features of the input data into a few latent variables that play a role in the prediction of the outputs. The correlations between data samples acquired from published experiments on ex-vivo retinas are accounted for in the model by a Gaussian Process (GP) prior. The proposed IB-GP model performs competitively to the state-of-the-art feedforward convolutional networks in predicting spike responses to natural stimuli. Finally, the IB-GP model is used in a closed-loop iterative process to obtain reduced-complexity inputs that elicit responses as elicited by the original stimuli. We found three properties of the retina's IB-GP model. First, the reconstructed stimuli from the latent variables show robustness in spike prediction across models. Second, surprisingly the dynamics of the high-dimensional stimuli and RGCs' responses are very well represented in the embeddings of the IB-GP model. Third, the minimum stimuli consist of different patterns: Gabor-type locally high-frequency filters, on- and off-center Gaussians, or a mixture of both. Overall, this work demonstrates that the IB-GP model provides a principled approach for joint learning of the stimuli and retina codes, capturing dynamics of the stimuli-RGCs in the latent space which could help better understand the computation of the early visual system. Babak Rahmani, Demetri Psaltis, Christophe Moser |
NeurIPS | 1 |