Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yingcai Ma
dblp:244/2505
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0005-2827-4462ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Recommender systems · 60% Information retrieval · 40% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommender systems › large-scale recommendation › multi-stage recommender systems
candidate generation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | PI2I: A Personalized Item-Based Collaborative Filtering Retrieval Framework · WWW 2026 |
Recommender systems
collaborative filtering |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | PI2I: A Personalized Item-Based Collaborative Filtering Retrieval Framework · WWW 2026 |
Recommender systems › collaborative filtering › neighborhood-based recommendation
item-based collaborative filtering |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | PI2I: A Personalized Item-Based Collaborative Filtering Retrieval Framework · WWW 2026 |
Information retrieval
personalized search |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | PI2I: A Personalized Item-Based Collaborative Filtering Retrieval Framework · WWW 2026 |
Information retrieval › multi-stage retrieval
two-stage retrieval |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | PI2I: A Personalized Item-Based Collaborative Filtering Retrieval Framework · WWW 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
two-tower model · 1.0negative sampling · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | PI2I: A Personalized Item-Based Collaborative Filtering Retrieval FrameworkabstractEfficiently selecting relevant content from vast candidate pools is a critical challenge in modern recommender systems. Traditional methods, such as item-to-item collaborative filtering (CF) and two-tower models, often fall short in capturing the complex user-item interactions due to uniform truncation strategies and overdue user-item crossing. To address these limitations, we propose Personalized Item-to-Item (PI2I), a novel two-stage retrieval framework that enhances the personalization capabilities of CF. In the first Indexer Building Stage (IBS), we optimize the retrieval pool by relaxing truncation thresholds to maximize Hit Rate, thereby temporarily retaining more items users might be interested in. In the second Personalized Retrieval Stage (PRS), we introduce an interactive scoring model to overcome the limitations of inner product calculations, allowing for richer modeling of intricate user-item interactions. Additionally, we construct negative samples based on the trigger-target (item-to-item) relationship, ensuring consistency between offline training and online inference. Offline experiments on large-scale real-world datasets demonstrate that PI2I outperforms traditional CF methods and rivals Two-Tower models. Deployed in the ''Guess You Like'' section on Taobao, PI2I achieved a 1.05% increase in online transaction rates. In addition, we have released a large-scale recommendation dataset collected from Taobao, containing 130 million real-world user interactions used in the experiments of this paper. The dataset is publicly available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/PI2I/PI2I, which could serve as a valuable benchmark for the research community. Yingcai Ma, Kairui Fu, Dunxian Huang, Yuliang Yan, Jian Wu 0032 |
WWW | 2 |
| 2019 | Query-based Interactive Recommendation by Meta-Path and Adapted Attention-GRUabstractRecently, interactive recommender systems are becoming increasingly popular. The insight is that, with the interaction between users and the system, (1) users can actively intervene the recommendation results rather than passively receive them, and (2) the system learns more about users so as to provide better recommendation. Yu Zhu 0007, Qingwen Liu 0002, Yingcai Ma, Wenwu Ou, Junxiong Zhu, Beidou Wang, Ziyu Guan, Deng Cai 0001 |
CIKM | 4 |