Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stanislas Pamela
dblp:244/2846
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8854-1749ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 77% Deep learning architectures and training · 23% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
conformal prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Calibrated Physics-Informed Uncertainty Quantification · ICML 2025 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning › physics-informed machine learning
physics-informed neural networks |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Calibrated Physics-Informed Uncertainty Quantification · ICML 2025 |
Computational science and engineering › computational physics
plasma physics simulation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | GyroSwin: 5D Surrogates for Gyrokinetic Plasma Turbulence Simulations · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computational science and engineering
uncertainty quantification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Calibrated Physics-Informed Uncertainty Quantification · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
vision transformer |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | GyroSwin: 5D Surrogates for Gyrokinetic Plasma Turbulence Simulations · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computational science and engineering
partial differential equation solver |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Calibrated Physics-Informed Uncertainty Quantification · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
vision transformer · 1.7mode separation · 1.7finite-difference stencil · 1.7cross-attention · 1.7conformal prediction · 1.7convolutional layers · 0.9convolutional layer · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Calibrated Physics-Informed Uncertainty QuantificationabstractSimulating complex physical systems is crucial for understanding and predicting phenomena across diverse fields, such as fluid dynamics and heat transfer, as well as plasma physics and structural mechanics. Traditional approaches rely on solving partial differential equations (PDEs) using numerical methods, which are computationally expensive and often prohibitively slow for real-time applications or large-scale simulations. Neural PDEs have emerged as efficient alternatives to these costly numerical solvers, offering significant computational speed-ups. However, their lack of robust uncertainty quantification (UQ) limits deployment in critical applications. We introduce a model-agnostic, physics-informed conformal prediction (CP) framework that provides guaranteed uncertainty estimates without requiring labelled data. By utilising a physics-based approach, we can quantify and calibrate the model’s inconsistencies with the physics rather than the uncertainty arising from the data. Our approach utilises convolutional layers as finite-difference stencils and leverages physics residual errors as nonconformity scores, enabling data-free UQ with marginal and joint coverage guarantees across prediction domains for a range of complex PDEs. We further validate the efficacy of our method on neural PDE models for plasma modelling and shot design in fusion reactors. Vignesh Gopakumar, Ander Gray, Lorenzo Zanisi, Timothy Nunn, Daniel Giles, Matt J. Kusner, Stanislas Pamela, Marc Peter Deisenroth |
ICML | 7 |
| 2025 | GyroSwin: 5D Surrogates for Gyrokinetic Plasma Turbulence SimulationsabstractNuclear fusion plays a pivotal role in the quest for reliable and sustainable energy production. A major roadblock to viable fusion power is understanding plasma turbulence, which significantly impairs plasma confinement, and is vital for next generation reactor design. Plasma turbulence is governed by the nonlinear gyrokinetic equation, which evolves a 5D distribution function over time. Due to its high computational cost, reduced-order models are often employed in practice to approximate turbulent transport of energy. However, they omit nonlinear effects unique to the full 5D dynamics. To tackle this, we introduce GyroSwin, the first scalable 5D neural surrogate that can model 5D nonlinear gyrokinetic simulations, thereby capturing the physical phenomena neglected by reduced models, while providing accurate estimates of turbulent heat transport. GyroSwin (i) extends hierarchical Vision Transformers to 5D, (ii) introduces cross-attention and integration modules for latent 3D$\leftrightarrow$5D interactions between electrostatic potential fields and the distribution function, and (iii) performs channelwise mode separation inspired by nonlinear physics. We demonstrate that GyroSwin outperforms widely used reduced numerics on heat flux prediction, captures the turbulent energy cascade, and reduces the cost of fully resolved nonlinear gyrokinetics by three orders of magnitude while remaining physically verifiable. GyroSwin shows promising scaling laws, tested up to one billion parameters, paving the way for scalable neural surrogates for gyrokinetic simulations of plasma turbulence. Fabian Paischer, Gianluca Galletti, William Hornsby, Paul Setinek, Lorenzo Zanisi, Naomi Carey, Stanislas Pamela, Johannes Brandstetter |
NeurIPS | 7 |