Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jinxin Zhou
dblp:244/3530
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 3 first-author · 7 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
6 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 27% Learning theory · 18% Efficient and distributed learning · 15% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural collapse |
2.4 | 4 | 2024 | Generalized Neural Collapse for a Large Number of Classes · ICML 2024 Are All Losses Created Equal: A Neural Collapse Perspective · NeurIPS 2022 On the Optimization Landscape of Neural Collapse under MSE Loss: Global Optimality with Unconstrained Features · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › adaptive computation
early exit |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tracing Representation Progression: Analyzing and Enhancing Layer-Wise Similarity · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tracing Representation Progression: Analyzing and Enhancing Layer-Wise Similarity · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › dynamic neural network
multi-exit network |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Tracing Representation Progression: Analyzing and Enhancing Layer-Wise Similarity · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DREAM: Diffusion Rectification and Estimation-Adaptive Models · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion model training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | DREAM: Diffusion Rectification and Estimation-Adaptive Models · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
feature learning theory |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Generalized Neural Collapse for a Large Number of Classes · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › non-convex optimization
landscape analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | On the Optimization Landscape of Neural Collapse under MSE Loss: Global Optimality with Unconstrained Features · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | On the Optimization Landscape of Neural Collapse under MSE Loss: Global Optimality with Unconstrained Features · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training optimization
optimization landscape of deep networks |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Are All Losses Created Equal: A Neural Collapse Perspective · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › implicit bias
implicit bias of gradient descent |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A Geometric Analysis of Neural Collapse with Unconstrained Features · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimization landscape |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A Geometric Analysis of Neural Collapse with Unconstrained Features · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
representation analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Tracing Representation Progression: Analyzing and Enhancing Layer-Wise Similarity · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Generalized Neural Collapse for a Large Number of Classes · ICML 2024 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
many-class classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Generalized Neural Collapse for a Large Number of Classes · ICML 2024 |
Image and video processing › super-resolution
image super-resolution |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | DREAM: Diffusion Rectification and Estimation-Adaptive Models · CVPR 2024 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Are All Losses Created Equal: A Neural Collapse Perspective · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
unconstrained feature model · 1.9estimation adaptation · 1.5diffusion rectification · 1.5hessian analysis · 1.1cosine similarity · 0.9centered kernel alignment · 0.9aligned training · 0.9theoretical analysis · 0.8margin maximization · 0.8mean squared error loss · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | On the Convergence of Gradient Descent on Learning Transformers With Residual ConnectionsabstractTransformer models have emerged as fundamental tools across various scientific and engineering disciplines, owing to their outstanding performance in diverse applications. Despite this empirical success, the theoretical foundations of Transformers remain relatively underdeveloped, particularly in understanding their training dynamics. Existing research predominantly examines isolated components–such as self-attention mechanisms and feedforward networks–without thoroughly investigating the interdependencies between these components, especially when residual connections are present. In this paper, we aim to bridge this gap by analyzing the convergence behavior of a structurally complete yet single-layer Transformer, comprising self-attention, a feedforward network, and residual connections. We demonstrate that, under appropriate initialization, gradient descent exhibits a linear convergence rate, where the convergence speed is determined by the minimum and maximum singular values of the output matrix from the attention layer. Moreover, our convergence analysis establishes a theoretical characterization of residual connections by showing that they alleviate the ill-conditioning of the attention output matrix, which arises from the low-rank structure induced by the softmax operation, thereby improving optimization stability. Empirical results corroborate our theoretical insights, illustrating the beneficial role of residual connections in promoting convergence stability. Jinxin Zhou, Jiachen Jiang, Zhihui Zhu |
IEEE Signal Process. Lett. | 2 |
| 2025 | Tracing Representation Progression: Analyzing and Enhancing Layer-Wise SimilarityabstractAnalyzing the similarity of internal representations within and across different models has been an important technique for understanding the behavior of deep neural networks. Most existing methods for analyzing the similarity between representations of high dimensions, such as those based on Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA), rely on statistical properties of the representations for a set of data points. In this paper, we focus on transformer models and study the similarity of representations between the hidden layers of individual transformers. In this context, we show that a simple sample-wise cosine similarity metric is capable of capturing the similarity and aligns with the complicated CKA. Our experimental results on common transformers reveal that representations across layers are positively correlated, with similarity increasing when layers get closer. We provide a theoretical justification for this phenomenon under the geodesic curve assumption for the learned transformer, a property that may approximately hold for residual networks. We then show that an increase in representation similarity implies an increase in predicted probability when directly applying the last-layer classifier to any hidden layer representation. This offers a justification for {\it saturation events}, where the model's top prediction remains unchanged across subsequent layers, indicating that the shallow layer has already learned the necessary knowledge. We then propose an aligned training method to improve the effectiveness of shallow layer by enhancing the similarity between internal representations, with trained models that enjoy the following properties: (1) more early saturation events, (2) layer-wise accuracies monotonically increase and reveal the minimal depth needed for the given task, (3) when served as multi-exit models, they achieve on-par performance with standard multi-exit architectures which consist of additional classifiers designed for early exiting in shallow layers. To our knowledge, our work is the first to show that one common classifier is sufficient for multi-exit models. We conduct experiments on both vision and NLP tasks to demonstrate the performance of the proposed aligned training. Jiachen Jiang, Jinxin Zhou, Zhihui Zhu |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | Analyzing Fine-Grained Alignment and Enhancing Vision Understanding in Multimodal Language ModelsabstractAchieving better alignment between vision embeddings and Large Language Models (LLMs) is crucial for enhancing the abilities of Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs), particularly for recent models that rely on powerful pretrained vision encoders and LLMs. A common approach to connect the pretrained vision encoder and LLM is through a projector applied after the vision encoder. However, the projector is often trained to enable the LLM to generate captions, and hence the mechanism by which LLMs understand each vision token remains unclear. In this work, we first investigate the role of the projector in compressing vision embeddings and aligning them with word embeddings. We show that the projector significantly compresses visual information, removing redundant details while preserving essential elements necessary for the LLM to understand visual content. We then examine patch-level alignment---the alignment between each vision patch and its corresponding semantic words---and propose a $\textit{multi-semantic alignment hypothesis}$. Our analysis indicates that the projector trained by caption loss improves patch-level alignment but only to a limited extent, resulting in weak and coarse alignment. To address this issue, we propose $\textit{patch-aligned training}$ to efficiently enhance patch-level alignment. Our experiments show that patch-aligned training (1) achieves stronger compression capability and improved patch-level alignment, enabling the MLLM to generate higher-quality captions, (2) improves the MLLM's performance by 16% on referring expression grounding tasks, 4% on question-answering tasks, and 3% on modern instruction-following benchmarks when using the same supervised fine-tuning (SFT) setting. The proposed method can be easily extended to other multimodal models. Jiachen Jiang, Jinxin Zhou, Xia Ning, Zhihui Zhu |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2024 | DREAM: Diffusion Rectification and Estimation-Adaptive ModelsabstractWe present DREAM, a novel training framework representing Diffusion Rectification and Estimation-Adaptive Models, requiring minimal code changes (just three lines) yet significantly enhancing the alignment of training with sampling in diffusion models. DREAM features two components: diffusion rectification, which adjusts training to reflect the sampling process, and estimation adaptation, which balances perception against distortion. When applied to image super-resolution (SR), DREAM adeptly navigates the tradeoff between minimizing distortion and preserving high image quality. Experiments demonstrate DREAM's superiority over standard diffusion-based SR methods, showing a 2 to 3× faster training convergence and a 10 to 20× reduction in sampling steps to achieve comparable results. We hope DREAM will inspire a rethinking of diffusion model training paradigms. Our source code is available at link. Jinxin Zhou, Tianyu Ding, Jiachen Jiang, Ilya Zharkov, Zhihui Zhu, Luming Liang |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2024 | Generalized Neural Collapse for a Large Number of ClassesabstractNeural collapse provides an elegant mathematical characterization of learned last layer representations (a.k.a. features) and classifier weights in deep classification models. Such results not only provide insights but also motivate new techniques for improving practical deep models. However, most of the existing empirical and theoretical studies in neural collapse focus on the case that the number of classes is small relative to the dimension of the feature space. This paper extends neural collapse to cases where the number of classes are much larger than the dimension of feature space, which broadly occur for language models, retrieval systems, and face recognition applications. We show that the features and classifier exhibit a generalized neural collapse phenomenon, where the minimum one-vs-rest margins is maximized. We provide empirical study to verify the occurrence of generalized neural collapse in practical deep neural networks. Moreover, we provide theoretical study to show that the generalized neural collapse provably occurs under unconstrained feature model with spherical constraint, under certain technical conditions on feature dimension and number of classes. Jiachen Jiang, Jinxin Zhou, Peng Wang 0098, Qing Qu 0001, Dustin G. Mixon, Chong You, Zhihui Zhu |
ICML | 2 |
| 2022 | On the Optimization Landscape of Neural Collapse under MSE Loss: Global Optimality with Unconstrained FeaturesabstractWhen training deep neural networks for classification tasks, an intriguing empirical phenomenon has been widely observed in the last-layer classifiers and features, where (i) the class means and the last-layer classifiers all collapse to the vertices of a Simplex Equiangular Tight Frame (ETF) up to scaling, and (ii) cross-example within-class variability of last-layer activations collapses to zero. This phenomenon is called Neural Collapse (NC), which seems to take place regardless of the choice of loss functions. In this work, we justify NC under the mean squared error (MSE) loss, where recent empirical evidence shows that it performs comparably or even better than the de-facto cross-entropy loss. Under a simplified unconstrained feature model, we provide the first global landscape analysis for vanilla nonconvex MSE loss and show that the (only!) global minimizers are neural collapse solutions, while all other critical points are strict saddles whose Hessian exhibit negative curvature directions. Furthermore, we justify the usage of rescaled MSE loss by probing the optimization landscape around the NC solutions, showing that the landscape can be improved by tuning the rescaling hyperparameters. Finally, our theoretical findings are experimentally verified on practical network architectures. Jinxin Zhou, Xiao Li 0026, Tianyu Ding, Chong You, Qing Qu 0001, Zhihui Zhu |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | Are All Losses Created Equal: A Neural Collapse PerspectiveabstractWhile cross entropy (CE) is the most commonly used loss function to train deep neural networks for classification tasks, many alternative losses have been developed to obtain better empirical performance. Among them, which one is the best to use is still a mystery, because there seem to be multiple factors affecting the answer, such as properties of the dataset, the choice of network architecture, and so on. This paper studies the choice of loss function by examining the last-layer features of deep networks, drawing inspiration from a recent line work showing that the global optimal solution of CE and mean-square-error (MSE) losses exhibits a Neural Collapse phenomenon. That is, for sufficiently large networks trained until convergence, (i) all features of the same class collapse to the corresponding class mean and (ii) the means associated with different classes are in a configuration where their pairwise distances are all equal and maximized. We extend such results and show through global solution and landscape analyses that a broad family of loss functions including commonly used label smoothing (LS) and focal loss (FL) exhibits Neural Collapse. Hence, all relevant losses (i.e., CE, LS, FL, MSE) produce equivalent features on training data. In particular, based on the unconstrained feature model assumption, we provide either the global landscape analysis for LS loss or the local landscape analysis for FL loss and show that the (only!) global minimizers are neural collapse solutions, while all other critical points are strict saddles whose Hessian exhibit negative curvature directions either in the global scope for LS loss or in the local scope for FL loss near the optimal solution. The experiments further show that Neural Collapse features obtained from all relevant losses (i.e., CE, LS, FL, MSE) lead to largely identical performance on test data as well, provided that the network is sufficiently large and trained until convergence. Jinxin Zhou, Chong You, Xiao Li 0026, Kangning Liu, Qing Qu 0001, Zhihui Zhu |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2021 | A Geometric Analysis of Neural Collapse with Unconstrained FeaturesabstractWe provide the first global optimization landscape analysis of Neural Collapse -- an intriguing empirical phenomenon that arises in the last-layer classifiers and features of neural networks during the terminal phase of training. As recently reported by Papyan et al., this phenomenon implies that (i) the class means and the last-layer classifiers all collapse to the vertices of a Simplex Equiangular Tight Frame (ETF) up to scaling, and (ii) cross-example within-class variability of last-layer activations collapses to zero. We study the problem based on a simplified unconstrained feature model, which isolates the topmost layers from the classifier of the neural network. In this context, we show that the classical cross-entropy loss with weight decay has a benign global landscape, in the sense that the only global minimizers are the Simplex ETFs while all other critical points are strict saddles whose Hessian exhibit negative curvature directions. Our analysis of the simplified model not only explains what kind of features are learned in the last layer, but also shows why they can be efficiently optimized, matching the empirical observations in practical deep network architectures. These findings provide important practical implications. As an example, our experiments demonstrate that one may set the feature dimension equal to the number of classes and fix the last-layer classifier to be a Simplex ETF for network training, which reduces memory cost by over 20% on ResNet18 without sacrificing the generalization performance. The source code is available at https://github.com/tding1/Neural-Collapse. Zhihui Zhu, Tianyu Ding, Jinxin Zhou, Xiao Li 0026, Chong You, Jeremias Sulam, Qing Qu 0001 |
NeurIPS | 3 |