Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Josephine Lukito

dblp:244/5973 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-0771-1070ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
discourse analysis
0.812024
Comparing a BERT Classifier and a GPT classifier for Detecting Connective Language Across Multiple Social Media · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text classification
social media text classification
0.812024
Comparing a BERT Classifier and a GPT classifier for Detecting Connective Language Across Multiple Social Media · EMNLP 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

GPT-3.5-Turbo · 0.8BERT · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Comparing a BERT Classifier and a GPT classifier for Detecting Connective Language Across Multiple Social Media
abstract
This study presents an approach for detecting connective language-defined as language that facilitates engagement, understanding, and conversation-from social media discussions.We developed and evaluated two types of classifiers: BERT and GPT-3.5 turbo.Our results demonstrate that the BERT classifier significantly outperforms GPT-3.5 turbo in detecting connective language.Furthermore, our analysis confirms that connective language is distinct from related concepts measuring discourse qualities, such as politeness and toxicity.We also explore the potential of BERT-based classifiers for platform-agnostic tools.This research advances our understanding of the linguistic dimensions of online communication and proposes practical tools for detecting connective language across diverse digital environments.
Josephine Lukito, Gina M. Masullo, Natalie Jomini Stroud
EMNLP1
2024 The Manifestation of Affective Polarization on Social Media: A Cross-Platform Supervised Machine Learning Approach
abstract
This project explores how affective polarization, hostility towards people’s political adversaries, manifests on social media. Whereas prior attempts have relied on sentiment analysis and bag-of-word approaches, we use supervised machine learning to capture the nuances of affective polarization in text on social media. Specifically, we fine-tune BERT to build a classifier that identifies expressions of affective polarization in posts shared on Facebook or Twitter during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic (n = 8,603,695). Focusing on this context allows us to study how affective polarization evolved on social media as the COVID-19 issue went from unfamiliar to highly political. We explore the temporal dynamics of affective polarization on Facebook and Twitter using ARIMA models and an outlier analysis of the first few months of the pandemic. Further, we examine the interplay between affective polarization and virality across the two platforms. The findings have important implications for those seeking to (1) capture affective polarization in text, and (2) understand how affective polarization manifests on social media. These implications are discussed.
Christian Staal Bruun Overgaard, Josephine Lukito, Kaiya Soorholtz
ICWSM2