Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sai Kiran Cherupally
dblp:244/7420
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0002-6305-1935ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Memory systems · 62% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 38% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial robustness |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Leveraging Noise and Aggressive Quantization of In-Memory Computing for Robust DNN Hardware Against Adversarial Input and Weight Attacks · DAC 2021 |
Memory systems › in-memory computing
in-memory computing for neural networks |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Leveraging Noise and Aggressive Quantization of In-Memory Computing for Robust DNN Hardware Against Adversarial Input and Weight Attacks · DAC 2021 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Leveraging Noise and Aggressive Quantization of In-Memory Computing for Robust DNN Hardware Against Adversarial Input and Weight Attacks · DAC 2021 |
Memory systems › processing-in-memory › computing-in-memory
analog in-memory computing |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Leveraging Noise and Aggressive Quantization of In-Memory Computing for Robust DNN Hardware Against Adversarial Input and Weight Attacks · DAC 2021 |
Memory systems
non-volatile memory |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Leveraging Noise and Aggressive Quantization of In-Memory Computing for Robust DNN Hardware Against Adversarial Input and Weight Attacks · DAC 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
partial sum quantization · 1.0noise-aware training · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Leveraging Noise and Aggressive Quantization of In-Memory Computing for Robust DNN Hardware Against Adversarial Input and Weight AttacksabstractIn-memory computing (IMC) substantially improves the energy efficiency of deep neural network (DNNs) hardware by activating many rows together and performing analog computing. The noisy analog IMC induces some amount of accuracy drop in hardware acceleration, which is generally considered as a negative effect. However, in this work, we discover that such hardware intrinsic noise can, on the contrary, play a positive role in enhancing adversarial robustness. To achieve that, we propose a new DNN training scheme that integrates measured IMC hardware noise and aggressive partial sum quantization at the IMC crossbar. We show that this effectively improves the robustness of IMC DNN hardware against both adversarial input and weight attacks. Against black-box adversarial input attacks and bit-flip weight attacks, DNN robustness has improved by up to 10.5% (CFAR-10 accuracy) and 33.6% (number of bit-flips), respectively, compared to conventional DNNs. Sai Kiran Cherupally, Adnan Siraj Rakin, Shihui Yin, Mingoo Seok, Deliang Fan, Jae-sun Seo |
DAC | 1 |
| 2021 | Modeling and Optimization of SRAM-based In-Memory Computing Hardware DesignabstractIn-memory computing (IMC) has been demonstrated as a promising technique to significantly improve energy-efficiency for deep neural network (DNN) hardware accelerators. However, designing one involves setting many design variables such as the number of parallel rows to assert, analog-to-digital converter (ADC) at the periphery of memory sub-array, activation/weight precisions of DNNs, etc., which affect energy-efficiency, DNN accuracy, and area. While individual IMC designs have been presented in the literature, they have not investigated this multi-dimensional design optimization. In this paper, to fill this knowledge gap, we present a SRAM-based IMC hardware modeling and optimization framework. A unified systematic study closely models IMC hardware, and investigates how a number of design variables and nonidealities (e.g. device mismatch and ADC quantization) affect the DNN accuracy of IMC design. To maintain high DNN accuracy for the IMC SRAM hardware, it is shown that the number of activated rows, ADC resolution, ADC quantization range, and different sources of variability/noise need to be carefully selected and co-optimized with an underlying DNN algorithm to implement. Jyotishman Saikia, Shihui Yin, Sai Kiran Cherupally, Bo Zhang 0105, Jian Meng, Mingoo Seok, Jae-sun Seo |
DATE | 3 |
| 2019 | ECG Authentication Neural Network Hardware Design with Collective Optimization of Low Precision and Structured CompressionabstractFor wearable devices that monitor personal health, secure access to private medical data becomes a crucial feature. Nowadays, device authentication based on biometrics such as fingerprint or iris has become increasingly popular. In this work, we investigate using electrocardiogram (ECG) signals as the biometric modality for device authentication, and we present accurate and low-power ECG-based authentication hardware. Deep neural networks (DNNs) have been employed with a cost function that maximizes inter-individual distance and minimizes intra-individual distance over time. During DNN training, we also introduce joint optimization of low-precision and structured sparsity, so that the real-time authentication hardware can consume minimal energy and area. Experimental results of custom hardware designed in 65nm LP CMOS technology exhibit low power consumption of 59.4 μW for real-time ECG authentication with a low equal error rate of 1.002% for a large 741-subject inhouse ECG database. Sai Kiran Cherupally, Gaurav Srivastava 0001, Shihui Yin, Deepak Kadetotad, Chisung Bae, Sang Joon Kim, Jae-sun Seo |
ISCAS | 1 |