Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shichao Fang
dblp:244/7952
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Requirements engineering and software design · 72% Compilers and program optimization · 28% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Model Transformation Development Using Automated Requirements Analysis, Metamodel Matching, and Transformation by Example · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2022 |
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering
model transformation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Model Transformation Development Using Automated Requirements Analysis, Metamodel Matching, and Transformation by Example · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2022 |
Compilers and program optimization › program transformation
program transformation synthesis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Model Transformation Development Using Automated Requirements Analysis, Metamodel Matching, and Transformation by Example · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2022 |
Requirements engineering and software design › requirements analysis
natural language requirements analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Model Transformation Development Using Automated Requirements Analysis, Metamodel Matching, and Transformation by Example · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2022 |
Requirements engineering and software design
requirements analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Model Transformation Development Using Automated Requirements Analysis, Metamodel Matching, and Transformation by Example · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
predictive specification · 0.6natural language processing · 0.6metamodel matching · 0.6machine learning · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Model Transformation Development Using Automated Requirements Analysis, Metamodel Matching, and Transformation by ExampleabstractIn this article, we address how the production of model transformations (MT) can be accelerated by automation of transformation synthesis from requirements, examples, and metamodels. We introduce a synthesis process based on metamodel matching, correspondence patterns between metamodels, and completeness and consistency analysis of matches. We describe how the limitations of metamodel matching can be addressed by combining matching with automated requirements analysis and model transformation by example (MTBE) techniques. We show that in practical examples a large percentage of required transformation functionality can usually be constructed automatically, thus potentially reducing development effort. We also evaluate the efficiency of synthesised transformations. Our novel contributions are: The concept of correspondence patterns between metamodels of a transformation. Requirements analysis of transformations using natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML). Symbolic MTBE using “predictive specification” to infer transformations from examples. Transformation generation in multiple MT languages and in Java, from an abstract intermediate language. Kevin Lano, Shekoufeh Kolahdouz Rahimi, Shichao Fang |
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. | 3 |
| 2020 | Automated Synthesis of ATL Transformations from Metamodel Correspondences
Kevin Lano, Shichao Fang |
MODELSWARD | 2 |