Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Natalia Gavrilenko

dblp:244/8281 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0008-8038-4230ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 50% Memory systems · 25% Parallel and multicore computing · 25%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Concurrent programming · 62% Programming languages and type systems · 38%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
GPUs and heterogeneous computing › GPU memory
GPU memory consistency
0.812024
Towards Unified Analysis of GPU Consistency · ASPLOS (4) 2024
GPUs and heterogeneous computing › GPU memory
GPU memory model
0.812024
Towards Unified Analysis of GPU Consistency · ASPLOS (4) 2024
Memory systems
memory consistency
0.812024
Towards Unified Analysis of GPU Consistency · ASPLOS (4) 2024
Parallel and multicore computing
memory model
0.812024
Towards Unified Analysis of GPU Consistency · ASPLOS (4) 2024
Concurrent programming › memory models
weak memory models
0.412019
BMC for Weak Memory Models: Relation Analysis for Compact SMT Encodings · CAV (1) 2019
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
bounded model checking
0.412019
BMC for Weak Memory Models: Relation Analysis for Compact SMT Encodings · CAV (1) 2019
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability modulo theories
SMT encoding
0.412019
BMC for Weak Memory Models: Relation Analysis for Compact SMT Encodings · CAV (1) 2019
Programming languages and type systems › language semantics
formal semantics
0.212024
Towards Unified Analysis of GPU Consistency · ASPLOS (4) 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

formal modeling · 1.5relation analysis · 0.8cat language · 0.4CAT language · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Towards Unified Analysis of GPU Consistency
abstract
After more than 30 years of research, there is a solid understanding of the consistency guarantees given by CPU systems. Unfortunately, the same is not yet true for GPUs. The growing popularity of general purpose GPU programming has been a call for action which industry players like Nvidia and Khronos have answered by formalizing their Ptx and Vulkan consistency models. These models give precise answers to questions about program's correctness. However, interpreting them still requires a level of expertise that escapes most developers, and the current tool support is insufficient.
Haining Tong, Natalia Gavrilenko, Hernán Ponce de León, Keijo Heljanko
ASPLOS (4)2
2019 BMC for Weak Memory Models: Relation Analysis for Compact SMT Encodings
abstract
We present Dartagnan , a bounded model checker (BMC) for concurrent programs under weak memory models. Its distinguishing feature is that the memory model is not implemented inside the tool but taken as part of the input. Dartagnan reads CAT , the standard language for memory models, which allows to define x86/ TSO , ARM v7, ARM v8, Power , C/C++, and Linux kernel concurrency primitives. BMC with memory models as inputs is challenging. One has to encode into SMT not only the program but also its semantics as defined by the memory model. What makes Dartagnan scale is its relation analysis, a novel static analysis that significantly reduces the size of the encoding. Dartagnan matches or even exceeds the performance of the model-specific verification tools Nidhugg and CBMC , as well as the performance of Herd , a CAT -compatible litmus testing tool. Compared to the unoptimized encoding, the speed-up is often more than two orders of magnitude.
Natalia Gavrilenko, Hernán Ponce de León, Florian Furbach, Keijo Heljanko, Roland Meyer 0001
CAV (1)1