Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Natalia Gavrilenko
dblp:244/8281
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0008-8038-4230ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 50% Memory systems · 25% Parallel and multicore computing · 25% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Concurrent programming · 62% Programming languages and type systems · 38% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GPUs and heterogeneous computing › GPU memory
GPU memory consistency |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Unified Analysis of GPU Consistency · ASPLOS (4) 2024 |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing › GPU memory
GPU memory model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Unified Analysis of GPU Consistency · ASPLOS (4) 2024 |
Memory systems
memory consistency |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Unified Analysis of GPU Consistency · ASPLOS (4) 2024 |
Parallel and multicore computing
memory model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Unified Analysis of GPU Consistency · ASPLOS (4) 2024 |
Concurrent programming › memory models
weak memory models |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | BMC for Weak Memory Models: Relation Analysis for Compact SMT Encodings · CAV (1) 2019 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
bounded model checking |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | BMC for Weak Memory Models: Relation Analysis for Compact SMT Encodings · CAV (1) 2019 |
Automated reasoning and model checking › satisfiability modulo theories
SMT encoding |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | BMC for Weak Memory Models: Relation Analysis for Compact SMT Encodings · CAV (1) 2019 |
Programming languages and type systems › language semantics
formal semantics |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Unified Analysis of GPU Consistency · ASPLOS (4) 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
formal modeling · 1.5relation analysis · 0.8cat language · 0.4CAT language · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Towards Unified Analysis of GPU ConsistencyabstractAfter more than 30 years of research, there is a solid understanding of the consistency guarantees given by CPU systems. Unfortunately, the same is not yet true for GPUs. The growing popularity of general purpose GPU programming has been a call for action which industry players like Nvidia and Khronos have answered by formalizing their Ptx and Vulkan consistency models. These models give precise answers to questions about program's correctness. However, interpreting them still requires a level of expertise that escapes most developers, and the current tool support is insufficient. Haining Tong, Natalia Gavrilenko, Hernán Ponce de León, Keijo Heljanko |
ASPLOS (4) | 2 |
| 2019 | BMC for Weak Memory Models: Relation Analysis for Compact SMT EncodingsabstractWe present Dartagnan , a bounded model checker (BMC) for concurrent programs under weak memory models. Its distinguishing feature is that the memory model is not implemented inside the tool but taken as part of the input. Dartagnan reads CAT , the standard language for memory models, which allows to define x86/ TSO , ARM v7, ARM v8, Power , C/C++, and Linux kernel concurrency primitives. BMC with memory models as inputs is challenging. One has to encode into SMT not only the program but also its semantics as defined by the memory model. What makes Dartagnan scale is its relation analysis, a novel static analysis that significantly reduces the size of the encoding. Dartagnan matches or even exceeds the performance of the model-specific verification tools Nidhugg and CBMC , as well as the performance of Herd , a CAT -compatible litmus testing tool. Compared to the unoptimized encoding, the speed-up is often more than two orders of magnitude. Natalia Gavrilenko, Hernán Ponce de León, Florian Furbach, Keijo Heljanko, Roland Meyer 0001 |
CAV (1) | 1 |