Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexandru Militaru

dblp:244/8331 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Distributed computing theory · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program verification
deductive verification
0.412019
Communication-Closed Asynchronous Protocols · CAV (2) 2019
Distributed computing theory
fault tolerance
0.412019
Communication-Closed Asynchronous Protocols · CAV (2) 2019
Distributed systems
consensus
0.112019
Communication-Closed Asynchronous Protocols · CAV (2) 2019
Distributed systems › replication
state machine replication
0.112019
Communication-Closed Asynchronous Protocols · CAV (2) 2019
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Communication-Closed Asynchronous Protocols
abstract
The verification of asynchronous fault-tolerant distributed systems is challenging due to unboundedly many interleavings and network failures (e.g., processes crash or message loss). We propose a method that reduces the verification of asynchronous fault-tolerant protocols to the verification of round-based synchronous ones. Synchronous protocols are easier to verify due to fewer interleavings, bounded message buffers etc. We implemented our reduction method and applied it to several state machine replication and consensus algorithms. The resulting synchronous protocols are verified using existing deductive verification methods.
Andrei Damian, Cezara Dragoi, Alexandru Militaru, Josef Widder
CAV (2)3