EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adina Nedelcu
dblp:244/8683
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 3 · 2 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | A Cryptographic View of Deep-Attestation, or How to Do Provably-Secure Layer-Linking
Ghada Arfaoui, Pierre-Alain Fouque, Thibaut Jacques, Pascal Lafourcade 0001, Adina Nedelcu, Cristina Onete, Léo Robert |
ACNS | 5 |
| 2021 | How to (Legally) Keep Secrets from Mobile Operators
Ghada Arfaoui, Olivier Blazy, Xavier Bultel, Pierre-Alain Fouque, Thibaut Jacques, Adina Nedelcu, Cristina Onete |
ESORICS (1) | 6 |
| 2019 | The privacy of the TLS 1.3 protocolabstractTLS (Transport Layer Security) is a widely deployed protocol that plays a vital role in securing Internet traffic. Given the numerous known attacks for TLS 1.2, it was imperative to change and even redesign the protocol in order to address them. In August 2018, a new version of the protocol, TLS 1.3, was standardized by the IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force). TLS 1.3 not only benefits from stronger security guarantees, but aims to protect the identities of the server and client by encrypting messages as soon as possible during the authentication. In this paper, we model the privacy guarantees of TLS 1.3 when parties execute a full handshake or use a session resumption, covering all the handshake modes of TLS. We build our privacy models on top of the one defined by Hermans et al. for RFIDs (Radio Frequency Identification Devices) that mostly targets authentication protocols. The enhanced models share similarities to the Bellare-Rogaway AKE (Authenticated Key Exchange) security model and consider adversaries that can compromise both types of participants in the protocol. In particular, modeling session resumption is non-trivial, given that session resumption tickets are essentially a state transmitted from one session to another and such link reveals information on the parties. On the positive side, we prove that TLS 1.3 protects the privacy of its users at least against passive adversaries, contrary to TLS 1.2, and against more powerful ones. Ghada Arfaoui, Xavier Bultel, Pierre-Alain Fouque, Adina Nedelcu, Cristina Onete |
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol. | 4 |