Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eva Prakash

dblp:244/8787 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-7875-0678ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Video understanding and tracking · 30% Vision and language · 30% Question answering and dialogue systems · 30%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal reasoning
compositional reasoning
0.612022
Measuring Compositional Consistency for Video Question Answering · CVPR 2022
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › question understanding
question decomposition
0.612022
Measuring Compositional Consistency for Video Question Answering · CVPR 2022
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video question answering
0.612022
Measuring Compositional Consistency for Video Question Answering · CVPR 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
regulatory genomics
0.412019
GkmExplain: fast and accurate interpretation of nonlinear gapped k-mer SVMs · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence modeling
sequence model interpretation
0.412019
GkmExplain: fast and accurate interpretation of nonlinear gapped k-mer SVMs · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene regulation
transcription factor binding site prediction
0.112019
GkmExplain: fast and accurate interpretation of nonlinear gapped k-mer SVMs · Bioinform. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

question decomposition engine · 0.6directed acyclic graph · 0.6integrated gradients · 0.4gapped k-mer SVM · 0.4SHAP · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Measuring Compositional Consistency for Video Question Answering
abstract
Recent video question answering benchmarks indicate that state-of-the-art models struggle to answer compositional questions. However, it remains unclear which types of compositional reasoning cause models to mispredict. Furthermore, it is difficult to discern whether models arrive at answers using compositional reasoning or by leveraging data biases. In this paper, we develop a question decomposition engine that programmatically deconstructs a compositional question into a directed acyclic graph of sub-questions. The graph is designed such that each parent question is a composition of its children. We present AGQA-Decomp, a benchmark containing 2.3M question graphs, with an average of 11.49 sub-questions per graph, and 4.55M total new sub-questions. Using question graphs, we evaluate three state-of-the-art models with a suite of novel compositional consistency metrics. We find that models either cannot reason correctly through most compositions or are reliant on incorrect reasoning to reach answers, frequently contradicting themselves or achieving high accuracies when failing at intermediate reasoning steps.
Mona Gandhi, Mustafa Omer Gul, Eva Prakash, Madeleine Grunde-McLaughlin, Ranjay Krishna, Maneesh Agrawala
CVPR3
2019 GkmExplain: fast and accurate interpretation of nonlinear gapped k-mer SVMs
abstract
SUMMARY: Support Vector Machines with gapped k-mer kernels (gkm-SVMs) have been used to learn predictive models of regulatory DNA sequence. However, interpreting predictive sequence patterns learned by gkm-SVMs can be challenging. Existing interpretation methods such as deltaSVM, in-silico mutagenesis (ISM) or SHAP either do not scale well or make limiting assumptions about the model that can produce misleading results when the gkm kernel is combined with nonlinear kernels. Here, we propose GkmExplain: a computationally efficient feature attribution method for interpreting predictive sequence patterns from gkm-SVM models that has theoretical connections to the method of Integrated Gradients. Using simulated regulatory DNA sequences, we show that GkmExplain identifies predictive patterns with high accuracy while avoiding pitfalls of deltaSVM and ISM and being orders of magnitude more computationally efficient than SHAP. By applying GkmExplain and a recently developed motif discovery method called TF-MoDISco to gkm-SVM models trained on in vivo transcription factor (TF) binding data, we recover consolidated, non-redundant TF motifs. Mutation impact scores derived using GkmExplain consistently outperform deltaSVM and ISM at identifying regulatory genetic variants from gkm-SVM models of chromatin accessibility in lymphoblastoid cell-lines. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code and example notebooks to reproduce results are at https://github.com/kundajelab/gkmexplain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Avanti Shrikumar, Eva Prakash, Anshul Kundaje
Bioinform.2