Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yizhe Sun

dblp:245/1624 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-5500-0858ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.612022
Towards Robustness of Deep Program Processing Models - Detection, Estimation, and Enhancement · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.612022
Towards Robustness of Deep Program Processing Models - Detection, Estimation, and Enhancement · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2022
Program synthesis and code generation › code model
code model robustness
0.612022
Towards Robustness of Deep Program Processing Models - Detection, Estimation, and Enhancement · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

optimization-based attack · 1.1adversarial training · 1.1adversarial example generation · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Towards Robustness of Deep Program Processing Models - Detection, Estimation, and Enhancement
abstract
Deep learning (DL) has recently been widely applied to diverse source code processing tasks in the software engineering (SE) community, which achieves competitive performance (e.g., accuracy). However, the robustness, which requires the model to produce consistent decisions given minorly perturbed code inputs, still lacks systematic investigation as an important quality indicator. This article initiates an early step and proposes a framework CARROT for robustness detection, measurement, and enhancement of DL models for source code processing. We first propose an optimization-based attack technique CARROT A to generate valid adversarial source code examples effectively and efficiently. Based on this, we define the robustness metrics and propose robustness measurement toolkit CARROT M , which employs the worst-case performance approximation under the allowable perturbations. We further propose to improve the robustness of the DL models by adversarial training (CARROT T ) with our proposed attack techniques. Our in-depth evaluations on three source code processing tasks (i.e., functionality classification, code clone detection, defect prediction) containing more than 3 million lines of code and the classic or SOTA DL models, including GRU, LSTM, ASTNN, LSCNN, TBCNN, CodeBERT, and CDLH, demonstrate the usefulness of our techniques for ❶ effective and efficient adversarial example detection, ❷ tight robustness estimation, and ❸ effective robustness enhancement.
Huangzhao Zhang, Zhiyi Fu, Ge Li 0001, Lei Ma 0003, Zhehao Zhao, Hua'an Yang, Yizhe Sun, Yang Liu 0003, Zhi Jin 0001
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol.7