Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Noah Rivkin
dblp:245/1821
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval
cross-language information retrieval |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Neural-Network Lexical Translation for Cross-lingual IR from Text and Speech · SIGIR 2019 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval
spoken document retrieval |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Neural-Network Lexical Translation for Cross-lingual IR from Text and Speech · SIGIR 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
word alignment · 0.4neural network · 0.4character sequence encoding · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Neural-Network Lexical Translation for Cross-lingual IR from Text and SpeechabstractWe propose a neural network model to estimate word translation probabilities for Cross-Lingual Information Retrieval (CLIR). The model estimates better probabilities for word translations than automatic word alignments alone, and generalizes to unseen source-target word pairs. We further improve the lexical neural translation model (and subsequently CLIR), by incorporating source word context, and by encoding the character sequences of input source words to generate translations of out-of-vocabulary words. To be effective, neural network models typically need training on large amounts of data labeled directly on the final task, in this case relevance to queries. In contrast, our approach only requires parallel data to train the translation model, and uses an unsupervised model to compute CLIR relevance scores. Rabih Zbib, Lingjun Zhao, Damianos Karakos, William Hartmann, Jay DeYoung, Zhongqiang Huang, Zhuolin Jiang, Noah Rivkin, Le Zhang 0002, Richard M. Schwartz, John Makhoul |
SIGIR | 8 |