Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tianjian Huang
dblp:245/2447
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 52% Learning theory · 34% Optimization for machine learning · 14% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › minimax estimation
minimax rates |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal Differentially Private Model Training with Public Data · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal Differentially Private Model Training with Public Data · ICML 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private learning
differentially private training |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal Differentially Private Model Training with Public Data · ICML 2024 |
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal Differentially Private Model Training with Public Data · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
feature attribution |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Rigorous Study of Integrated Gradients Method and Extensions to Internal Neuron Attributions · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
integrated gradients |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Rigorous Study of Integrated Gradients Method and Extensions to Internal Neuron Attributions · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Rigorous Study of Integrated Gradients Method and Extensions to Internal Neuron Attributions · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
neuron attribution |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Rigorous Study of Integrated Gradients Method and Extensions to Internal Neuron Attributions · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
minimax optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Solving a Class of Non-Convex Min-Max Games Using Iterative First Order Methods · NeurIPS 2019 |
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Solving a Class of Non-Convex Min-Max Games Using Iterative First Order Methods · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › convex optimization
stochastic convex optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Optimal Differentially Private Model Training with Public Data · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mean estimation · 1.5empirical risk minimization · 1.5polyak-łojasiewicz condition · 0.8lipschitz analysis · 0.6axiomatic analysis · 0.6gradient descent-ascent · 0.4gradient descent ascent · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Optimal Differentially Private Model Training with Public DataabstractDifferential privacy (DP) ensures that training a machine learning model does not leak private data. In practice, we may have access to auxiliary public data that is free of privacy concerns. In this work, we assume access to a given amount of public data and settle the following fundamental open questions: 1. What is the optimal (worst-case) error of a DP model trained over a private data set while having access to side public data? 2. How can we harness public data to improve DP model training in practice? We consider these questions in both the local and central models of pure and approximate DP. To answer the first question, we prove tight (up to log factors) lower and upper bounds that characterize the optimal error rates of three fundamental problems: mean estimation, empirical risk minimization, and stochastic convex optimization. We show that the optimal error rates can be attained (up to log factors) by either discarding private data and training a public model, or treating public data like it is private and using an optimal DP algorithm. To address the second question, we develop novel algorithms that are "even more optimal" (i.e. better constants) than the asymptotically optimal approaches described above. For local DP mean estimation, our algorithm is optimal including constants. Empirically, our algorithms show benefits over the state-of-the-art. Andrew Lowy, Zeman Li, Tianjian Huang, Meisam Razaviyayn |
ICML | 3 |
| 2023 | Mobile Application Privacy Risk Assessments from User-authored ScenariosabstractMobile applications (apps) provide users valuable benefits at the risk of exposing users to privacy harms. Improving privacy in mobile apps faces several challenges, in particular, that many apps are developed by low resourced software development teams, such as end-user programmers or in startups. In addition, privacy risks are primarily known to users, which can make it difficult for developers to prioritize privacy for sensitive data. In this paper, we introduce a novel, lightweight method that allows app developers to elicit scenarios and privacy risk scores from users directly using only an app screenshot. The technique relies on named entity recognition (NER) to identify information types in user-authored scenarios, which are then fed in real-time to a privacy risk survey that users complete. The best-performing NER model predicts information types with a weighted average precision of 0.70 and recall of 0.72, after post-processing to remove false positives. The model was trained on a labeled 300-scenario corpus, and evaluated in an end-to-end evaluation using an additional 203 scenarios yielding 2,338 user-provided privacy risk scores. Finally, we discuss how developers can use the risk scores to prioritize, select and apply privacy design strategies in the context of four user-authored scenarios. Tianjian Huang, Vaishnavi Kaulagi, Mitra Bokaei Hosseini, Travis D. Breaux |
RE | 1 |
| 2022 | A Rigorous Study of Integrated Gradients Method and Extensions to Internal Neuron AttributionsabstractAs deep learning (DL) efficacy grows, concerns for poor model explainability grow also. Attribution methods address the issue of explainability by quantifying the importance of an input feature for a model prediction. Among various methods, Integrated Gradients (IG) sets itself apart by claiming other methods failed to satisfy desirable axioms, while IG and methods like it uniquely satisfy said axioms. This paper comments on fundamental aspects of IG and its applications/extensions: 1) We identify key differences between IG function spaces and the supporting literature’s function spaces which problematize previous claims of IG uniqueness. We show that with the introduction of an additional axiom, non-decreasing positivity, the uniqueness claims can be established. 2) We address the question of input sensitivity by identifying function classes where IG is/is not Lipschitz in the attributed input. 3) We show that axioms for single-baseline methods have analogous properties for methods with probability distribution baselines. 4) We introduce a computationally efficient method of identifying internal neurons that contribute to specified regions of an IG attribution map. Finally, we present experimental results validating this method. Daniel Lundström, Tianjian Huang, Meisam Razaviyayn |
ICML | 2 |
| 2021 | Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers for QuantizationabstractQuantization of the parameters of machine learning models, such as deep neural networks, requires solving constrained optimization problems, where the constraint set is formed by the Cartesian product of many simple discrete sets. For such optimization problems, we study the performance of the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers for Quantization (ADMM-Q) algorithm, which is a variant of the widely-used ADMM method applied to our discrete optimization problem. We establish the convergence of the iterates of ADMM-Q to certain stationary points. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first analysis of an ADMM-type method for problems with discrete variables/constraints. Based on our theoretical insights, we develop a few variants of ADMM-Q that can handle inexact update rules, and have improved performance via the use of "soft projection" and "injecting randomness to the algorithm". We empirically evaluate the efficacy of our proposed approaches. Tianjian Huang, Prajwal Singhania, Maziar Sanjabi, Pabitra Mitra, Meisam Razaviyayn |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2021 | A decentralized adaptive momentum method for solving a class of min-max optimization problems
Babak Barazandeh, Tianjian Huang, George Michailidis |
Signal Process. | 2 |
| 2019 | Solving a Class of Non-Convex Min-Max Games Using Iterative First Order MethodsabstractRecent applications that arise in machine learning have surged significant interest in solving min-max saddle point games. This problem has been extensively studied in the convex-concave regime for which a global equilibrium solution can be computed efficiently. In this paper, we study the problem in the non-convex regime and show that an $\varepsilon$--first order stationary point of the game can be computed when one of the player’s objective can be optimized to global optimality efficiently. In particular, we first consider the case where the objective of one of the players satisfies the Polyak-{\L}ojasiewicz (PL) condition. For such a game, we show that a simple multi-step gradient descent-ascent algorithm finds an $\varepsilon$--first order stationary point of the problem in $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\varepsilon^{-2})$ iterations. Then we show that our framework can also be applied to the case where the objective of the ``max-player" is concave. In this case, we propose a multi-step gradient descent-ascent algorithm that finds an $\varepsilon$--first order stationary point of the game in $\widetilde{\cal O}(\varepsilon^{-3.5})$ iterations, which is the best known rate in the literature. We applied our algorithm to a fair classification problem of Fashion-MNIST dataset and observed that the proposed algorithm results in smoother training and better generalization. Maher Nouiehed, Maziar Sanjabi, Tianjian Huang, Jason D. Lee, Meisam Razaviyayn |
NeurIPS | 3 |