Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael R. Zhang

dblp:245/2842 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
2as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0000-8281-0856ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 2 first-author · 7 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Reinforcement learning · 26% Trustworthy machine learning · 14% Deep learning architectures and training · 12%

Topics — the 20 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent
0.922021
On Monotonic Linear Interpolation of Neural Network Parameters · ICML 2021
Lookahead Optimizer: k steps forward, 1 step back · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › machine unlearning
exact unlearning
0.912025
Fast Exact Unlearning for In-Context Learning Data for LLMs · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
in-context learning
0.912025
Fast Exact Unlearning for In-Context Learning Data for LLMs · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
machine unlearning
0.912025
Fast Exact Unlearning for In-Context Learning Data for LLMs · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.712023
Multi-Rate VAE: Train Once, Get the Full Rate-Distortion Curve · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
rate-distortion tradeoff
0.712023
Multi-Rate VAE: Train Once, Get the Full Rate-Distortion Curve · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder
0.712023
Multi-Rate VAE: Train Once, Get the Full Rate-Distortion Curve · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain generalization
0.512021
Learning Domain Invariant Representations in Goal-conditioned Block MDPs · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › invariant representation learning
domain-invariant representation
0.512021
Learning Domain Invariant Representations in Goal-conditioned Block MDPs · NeurIPS 2021
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
dynamic modeling
0.512021
Autoregressive Dynamics Models for Offline Policy Evaluation and Optimization · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
goal-conditioned reinforcement learning
0.512021
Learning Domain Invariant Representations in Goal-conditioned Block MDPs · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss landscape
0.512021
On Monotonic Linear Interpolation of Neural Network Parameters · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
0.512021
Autoregressive Dynamics Models for Offline Policy Evaluation and Optimization · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss landscape
monotonic linear interpolation
0.512021
On Monotonic Linear Interpolation of Neural Network Parameters · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning
0.512021
Autoregressive Dynamics Models for Offline Policy Evaluation and Optimization · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy evaluation
0.512021
Benchmarks for Deep Off-Policy Evaluation · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy evaluation
0.512021
Autoregressive Dynamics Models for Offline Policy Evaluation and Optimization · ICLR 2021
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics
0.512021
On Monotonic Linear Interpolation of Neural Network Parameters · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › optimization
optimizer design
0.412019
Lookahead Optimizer: k steps forward, 1 step back · NeurIPS 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › markov decision process › partially observable MDP
Block MDP
0.112021
Learning Domain Invariant Representations in Goal-conditioned Block MDPs · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quantized k-means · 0.9in-context learning · 0.9variational inference · 0.7theoretical framework · 0.5off-policy evaluation · 0.5differential geometry · 0.5autoregressive dynamics models · 0.5PA-SkewFit · 0.5lookahead · 0.4adaptive learning rate · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 BEADS: Bias Evaluation Across Domains
abstract
Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have substantially improved natural language processing (NLP) applications. However, these models often inherit and amplify biases present in their training data. Although several datasets exist for bias detection, most are limited to one or two NLP tasks, typically classification or evaluation and do not provide broad coverage across diverse task settings. To address this gap, we introduce the Bias Evaluations Across Domains (BEADs) dataset, designed to support a wide range of NLP tasks, including text classification, token classification, bias quantification, and benign language generation. A key contribution of this work is a gold-standard annotation scheme that supports both evaluation and supervised training of language models. Experiments on state-of-the-art models reveal some gaps: some models exhibit systematic bias toward specific demographics, while others apply safety guardrails more strictly or inconsistently across groups. Overall, these results highlight persistent shortcomings in current models and underscore the need for comprehensive bias evaluation. The benchmark will be made publicly available for research ( https://huggingface.co/datasets/shainar/BEAD ).
Shaina Raza, Michael R. Zhang
NLDB3
2025 Fast Exact Unlearning for In-Context Learning Data for LLMs
abstract
Modern machine learning models are expensive to train, and there is a growing concern about the challenge of retroactively removing specific training data. Achieving exact unlearning in deep learning pipelines—producing models as if certain data had never been included in training—remains an open problem. In this paper, we revisit exact unlearning in deep learning and show that for large language models (LLMs) we can efficiently exactly unlearn “fine-tuning data" (the data used to adapt a pre-trained model). This follows from two observations. First, we can use in-context learning to adapt the LLM to the fine-tuning dataset instead of SGD based algorithms. Second, we show that accurate in-context learning can be done with quantized k-means, which allows for effectively constant time unlearning operations. Our evaluation shows that this unlearning recipe has similar performance to fine-tuning alternatives, but vastly reduces the unlearning costs. Our study also highlights the need for new measures of unlearning cost when adapting the learning algorithm to have faster unlearn operations.
Andrei Ioan Muresanu, Anvith Thudi, Michael R. Zhang, Nicolas Papernot
ICML3
2023 Multi-Rate VAE: Train Once, Get the Full Rate-Distortion Curve
Juhan Bae, Michael R. Zhang, Michael Ruan, So Hasegawa, Jimmy Ba, Roger B. Grosse
ICLR2
2023 Classifying Course Discussion Board Questions using LLMs
abstract
Large language models (LLMs) can be used to answer student questions on course discussion boards, but there is a risk of LLMs answering questions they are unable to address. We propose and evaluate an LLM-based system that classifies student questions into one of four types: conceptual, homework, logistics, and not answerable. We then prompt an LLM using a type-specific prompt. Using GPT-3, we achieve 81% classification accuracy across the four categories. Furthermore, we achieve 93% accuracy on classifying not answerable questions. This indicates that our system effectively ignores questions that it cannot address.
Brandon Jaipersaud, Jimmy Ba, Andrew Petersen 0001, Lisa Zhang 0003, Michael R. Zhang
ITiCSE (2)6
2021 Benchmarks for Deep Off-Policy Evaluation
Justin Fu, Mohammad Norouzi 0002, Ofir Nachum, George Tucker, Ziyu Wang 0001, Alexander Novikov 0001, Sherry Yang 0001, Michael R. Zhang, Yutian Chen 0001, Aviral Kumar, Cosmin Paduraru, Sergey Levine, Tom Le Paine
ICLR8
2021 Autoregressive Dynamics Models for Offline Policy Evaluation and Optimization
Michael R. Zhang, Thomas Paine, Ofir Nachum, Cosmin Paduraru, George Tucker, Ziyu Wang 0001, Mohammad Norouzi 0002
ICLR1
2021 On Monotonic Linear Interpolation of Neural Network Parameters
abstract
Linear interpolation between initial neural network parameters and converged parameters after training with stochastic gradient descent (SGD) typically leads to a monotonic decrease in the training objective. This Monotonic Linear Interpolation (MLI) property, first observed by Goodfellow et al. 2014, persists in spite of the non-convex objectives and highly non-linear training dynamics of neural networks. Extending this work, we evaluate several hypotheses for this property that, to our knowledge, have not yet been explored. Using tools from differential geometry, we draw connections between the interpolated paths in function space and the monotonicity of the network — providing sufficient conditions for the MLI property under mean squared error. While the MLI property holds under various settings (e.g., network architectures and learning problems), we show in practice that networks violating the MLI property can be produced systematically, by encouraging the weights to move far from initialization. The MLI property raises important questions about the loss landscape geometry of neural networks and highlights the need to further study their global properties.
James Lucas, Juhan Bae, Michael R. Zhang, Stanislav Fort, Richard S. Zemel, Roger B. Grosse
ICML3
2021 Learning Domain Invariant Representations in Goal-conditioned Block MDPs
abstract
Deep Reinforcement Learning (RL) is successful in solving many complex Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) problems. However, agents often face unanticipated environmental changes after deployment in the real world. These changes are often spurious and unrelated to the underlying problem, such as background shifts for visual input agents. Unfortunately, deep RL policies are usually sensitive to these changes and fail to act robustly against them. This resembles the problem of domain generalization in supervised learning. In this work, we study this problem for goal-conditioned RL agents. We propose a theoretical framework in the Block MDP setting that characterizes the generalizability of goal-conditioned policies to new environments. Under this framework, we develop a practical method PA-SkewFit that enhances domain generalization. The empirical evaluation shows that our goal-conditioned RL agent can perform well in various unseen test environments, improving by 50\% over baselines.
Beining Han, Chongyi Zheng, Harris Chan, Keiran Paster, Michael R. Zhang, Jimmy Ba
NeurIPS5
2019 Lookahead Optimizer: k steps forward, 1 step back
abstract
The vast majority of successful deep neural networks are trained using variants of stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithms. Recent attempts to improve SGD can be broadly categorized into two approaches: (1) adaptive learning rate schemes, such as AdaGrad and Adam and (2) accelerated schemes, such as heavy-ball and Nesterov momentum. In this paper, we propose a new optimization algorithm, Lookahead, that is orthogonal to these previous approaches and iteratively updates two sets of weights. Intuitively, the algorithm chooses a search direction by looking ahead at the sequence of ``fast weights" generated by another optimizer. We show that Lookahead improves the learning stability and lowers the variance of its inner optimizer with negligible computation and memory cost. We empirically demonstrate Lookahead can significantly improve the performance of SGD and Adam, even with their default hyperparameter settings on ImageNet, CIFAR-10/100, neural machine translation, and Penn Treebank.
Michael R. Zhang, James Lucas, Jimmy Ba, Geoffrey E. Hinton
NeurIPS1