Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Saketh Ram Kasibatla
dblp:245/2963
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program synthesis and code generation › neural program synthesis
LLM-based program synthesis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | HYSYNTH: Context-Free LLM Approximation for Guiding Program Synthesis · NeurIPS 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | HYSYNTH: Context-Free LLM Approximation for Guiding Program Synthesis · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 1.5context-free surrogate model · 1.5combinatorial search · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | The Command Line GUIde: Graphical Interfaces from Man Pages via AI
Saketh Ram Kasibatla, Kiran Medleri Hiremath, Raven Rothkopf, Sorin Lerner, Haijun Xia, Brian Hempel |
VL/HCC | 1 |
| 2024 | HYSYNTH: Context-Free LLM Approximation for Guiding Program SynthesisabstractMany structured prediction and reasoning tasks can be framed as program synthesis problems, where the goal is to generate a program in a \emph{domain-specific language} (DSL) that transforms input data into the desired output. Unfortunately, purely neural approaches, such as large language models (LLMs), often fail to produce fully correct programs in unfamiliar DSLs, while purely symbolic methods based on combinatorial search scale poorly to complex problems. Motivated by these limitations, we introduce a hybrid approach, where LLM completions for a given task are used to learn a task-specific, context-free surrogate model, which is then used to guide program synthesis. We evaluate this hybrid approach on three domains, and show that it outperforms both unguided search and direct sampling from LLMs, as well as existing program synthesizers. Shraddha Barke, Emmanuel Anaya Gonzalez, Saketh Ram Kasibatla, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, Nadia Polikarpova |
NeurIPS | 3 |