EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bin-Bin Yang
dblp:245/3374
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Language models and text generation · 35% Reinforcement learning · 20% Trustworthy machine learning · 18% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reward design |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Triviality Corrected Endogenous Reward · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation evaluation
story evaluation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | EvolvR: Self-Evolving Pairwise Reasoning for Story Evaluation to Enhance Generation · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
story generation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | EvolvR: Self-Evolving Pairwise Reasoning for Story Evaluation to Enhance Generation · ACL (1) 2026 |
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification |
0.8 | 2 | 2019 | On the Robust Splitting Criterion of Random Forest · ICDM 2019 Weighted Oblique Decision Trees · AAAI 2019 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
decision tree learning |
0.8 | 2 | 2019 | On the Robust Splitting Criterion of Random Forest · ICDM 2019 Weighted Oblique Decision Trees · AAAI 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › speech enhancement
noise estimation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | On the noise estimation statistics · Artif. Intell. 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › ranking
AUC optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | AUC Optimization with a Reject Option · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convex relaxation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | AUC Optimization with a Reject Option · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | AUC Optimization with a Reject Option · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
selective classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | AUC Optimization with a Reject Option · AAAI 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › learning with noisy labels
label noise robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On the Robust Splitting Criterion of Random Forest · ICDM 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On the Robust Splitting Criterion of Random Forest · ICDM 2019 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › decision tree learning
splitting criterion |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On the Robust Splitting Criterion of Random Forest · ICDM 2019 |
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Weighted Oblique Decision Trees · AAAI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
triviality correction · 1.0self-evolving pairwise reasoning · 1.0reinforcement learning · 1.0endogenous reward · 1.0weighted information entropy · 0.8random initialization · 0.8loss function analysis · 0.8statistics · 0.5plug-in rule · 0.4online algorithm · 0.4convex relaxation · 0.4AUC optimization · 0.4mutual coupling · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | EvolvR: Self-Evolving Pairwise Reasoning for Story Evaluation to Enhance GenerationabstractXinda Wang, Zhengxu Hou, Yangshijie Zhang, Yanbingren, Jialin Liu, ChenZhuo Zhao, Zhibo Yang, Bin-Bin Yang, Feng Xiao. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Xinda Wang 0006, Zhengxu Hou, Yangshijie Zhang, Bingren Yan, Chenzhuo Zhao, Bin-Bin Yang |
ACL (1) | 8 |
| 2026 | Triviality Corrected Endogenous RewardabstractXinda Wang, Zhengxu Hou, Yangshijie Zhang, Yanbingren, Jialin Liu, ChenZhuo Zhao, Zhibo Yang, Bin-Bin Yang, Feng Xiao. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Xinda Wang 0006, Zhengxu Hou, Yangshijie Zhang, Bingren Yan, Chenzhuo Zhao, Bin-Bin Yang |
ACL (1) | 8 |
| 2021 | On the noise estimation statistics
Wei Gao 0008, Teng Zhang 0001, Bin-Bin Yang, Zhi-Hua Zhou |
Artif. Intell. | 3 |
| 2020 | AUC Optimization with a Reject OptionabstractMaking an erroneous decision may cause serious results in diverse mission-critical tasks such as medical diagnosis and bioinformatics. Previous work focuses on classification with a reject option, i.e., abstain rather than classify an instance of low confidence. Most mission-critical tasks are always accompanied with class imbalance and cost sensitivity, where AUC has been shown a preferable measure than accuracy in classification. In this work, we propose the framework of AUC optimization with a reject option, and the basic idea is to withhold the decision of ranking a pair of positive and negative instances with a lower cost, rather than mis-ranking. We obtain the Bayes optimal solution for ranking, and learn the reject function and score function for ranking, simultaneously. An online algorithm has been developed for AUC optimization with a reject option, by considering the convex relaxation and plug-in rule. We verify, both theoretically and empirically, the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. Song-Qing Shen, Bin-Bin Yang, Wei Gao 0008 |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2019 | Weighted Oblique Decision TreesabstractDecision trees have attracted much attention during the past decades. Previous decision trees include axis-parallel and oblique decision trees; both of them try to find the best splits via exhaustive search or heuristic algorithms in each iteration. Oblique decision trees generally simplify tree structure and take better performance, but are always accompanied with higher computation, as well as the initialization with the best axis-parallel splits. This work presents the Weighted Oblique Decision Tree (WODT) based on continuous optimization with random initialization. We consider different weights of each instance for child nodes at all internal nodes, and then obtain a split by optimizing the continuous and differentiable objective function of weighted information entropy. Extensive experiments show the effectiveness of the proposed algorithm. Bin-Bin Yang, Song-Qing Shen, Wei Gao 0008 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2019 | On the Robust Splitting Criterion of Random ForestabstractSplitting criteria have played an important role in the construction of decision trees, and various trees have been developed based on different criteria. This work presents a unified framework on various splitting criteria from the perspective of loss functions, and most classical splitting criteria can be viewed essentially as the optimizations of loss functions in this framework. We further introduce a new splitting criterion, named pairwise gain, which is motivated from a lower bound on the mutual coupling of pairwise loss. Theoretically, we prove that this new criterion is robust to symmetric and asymmetric label noises simultaneously. Based on this new criterion, we develop another variant of random forests, and extensive experiments are provided to verify its robustness. Bin-Bin Yang, Wei Gao 0008, Ming Li 0005 |
ICDM | 1 |