Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jacob Baldwin
dblp:245/3407
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Biometric security · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Biometric security › biometric authentication
biometric verification |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Beyond Speech: Generalizing D-Vectors for Biometric Verification · AAAI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deep learning · 0.4d-vectors · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Shared Multi-Keyboard and Bilingual Datasets to Support Keystroke Dynamics ResearchabstractKeystroke dynamics has been shown to be a promising method for user authentication based on a user's typing rhythms. Over the years, it has seen increasing applications such as in preventing transaction fraud, account takeovers, and identity theft. However, due to the variable nature of keystroke dynamics, a user's typing patterns may vary on a different keyboard or in a different keyboard language setting, which may affect the system accuracy. In other words, an algorithm modeled with data collected using a mechanical keyboard may perform significantly differently when tested with an ergonomic keyboard. Similarly, an algorithm modeled with data collected in one language may perform significantly differently when tested with another language. Hence, there is a need to study the impact of multiple keyboards and multiple languages on keystroke dynamics performance. This motivated us to develop two free-text keystroke dynamics datasets. The first is a multi-keyboard keystroke dataset comprising of four (4) physical keyboards - mechanical, ergonomic, membrane, and laptop keyboards - and the second is a bilingual keystroke dataset in both English and Chinese languages. Data were collected from a total of 86 participants using a non-intrusive web-based keylogger in a semi-controlled setting. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first multi-keyboard and bilingual keystroke datasets, as well as the data collection software, to be made publicly available for research purposes. The usefulness of our datasets was demonstrated by evaluating the performance of two state-of-the-art free-text algorithms. Ahmed Anu Wahab, Daqing Hou, Mahesh K. Banavar, Stephanie Schuckers, Kenneth Eaton 0002, Jacob Baldwin, Robert Wright |
CODASPY | 6 |
| 2019 | Beyond Speech: Generalizing D-Vectors for Biometric VerificationabstractDeep learning based automatic feature extraction methods have radically transformed speaker identification and facial recognition. Current approaches are typically specialized for individual domains, such as Deep Vectors (D-Vectors) for speaker identification. We provide two distinct contributions: a generalized framework for biometric verification inspired by D-Vectors and novel models that outperform current stateof-the-art approaches. Our approach supports substitution of various feature extraction models and improves the robustness of verification tests across domains. We demonstrate the framework and models for two different behavioral biometric verification problems: keystroke and mobile gait. We present a comprehensive empirical analysis comparing our framework to the state-of-the-art in both domains. Our models perform verification with higher accuracy using orders of magnitude less data than state-of-the-art approaches in both domains. We believe that the combination of high accuracy and practical data requirements will enable application of behavioral biometric models outside of the laboratory in support of much-needed improvements to cyber security. Jacob Baldwin, Ryan Burnham, Andrew Meyer, Robert Dora, Robert Wright |
AAAI | 1 |