EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zeyang Zhao
dblp:245/3928
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
2as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Graph learning · 40% Video understanding and tracking · 30% Image recognition and object detection · 15% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Memory systems · 65% Storage systems · 35% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory systems › hybrid memory
hybrid memory management |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | NStore: A High-Performance NUMA-Aware Key-Value Store for Hybrid Memory · IEEE Trans. Computers 2025 |
Storage systems
key-value storage |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | NStore: A High-Performance NUMA-Aware Key-Value Store for Hybrid Memory · IEEE Trans. Computers 2025 |
Memory systems
non-volatile memory |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | NStore: A High-Performance NUMA-Aware Key-Value Store for Hybrid Memory · IEEE Trans. Computers 2025 |
Memory systems › non-volatile memory
persistent memory |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | NStore: A High-Performance NUMA-Aware Key-Value Store for Hybrid Memory · IEEE Trans. Computers 2025 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
object tracking |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ARTrackV2: Prompting Autoregressive Tracker Where to Look and How to Describe · CVPR 2024 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
oriented object detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Projecting Points to Axes: Oriented Object Detection via Point-Axis Representation · ECCV (28) 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
point cloud |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Projecting Points to Axes: Oriented Object Detection via Point-Axis Representation · ECCV (28) 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
expressive power |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PlanE: Representation Learning over Planar Graphs · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PlanE: Representation Learning over Planar Graphs · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PlanE: Representation Learning over Planar Graphs · NeurIPS 2023 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph isomorphism |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PlanE: Representation Learning over Planar Graphs · NeurIPS 2023 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory › graph isomorphism
planar graph isomorphism |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PlanE: Representation Learning over Planar Graphs · NeurIPS 2023 |
Storage systems
crash consistency |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | NStore: A High-Performance NUMA-Aware Key-Value Store for Hybrid Memory · IEEE Trans. Computers 2025 |
Storage systems
storage reliability |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | NStore: A High-Performance NUMA-Aware Key-Value Store for Hybrid Memory · IEEE Trans. Computers 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
isomorphism-invariant representation · 1.3hopcroft-tarjan algorithm · 1.3log-structured storage · 0.9garbage collection · 0.9cache replacement · 0.9point-axis representation · 0.8autoregressive generative framework · 0.8appearance analysis · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Test-Time Adaptation via Distribution-Aware Guidance for Vision-Language Models
Qilong Xue, Chenhao Ding, Zhengdong Zhou, Zeyang Zhao, Yihong Gong |
ICIC (1) | 4 |
| 2025 | A novel method for surface defect inspection: Unsupervised continual learning for gradually varying domains
Renfei Chen, Zeyang Zhao |
Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. | 3 |
| 2025 | NStore: A High-Performance NUMA-Aware Key-Value Store for Hybrid MemoryabstractEmerging persistent memory (PM) promises near-DRAM performance, larger capacity, and data persistence, attracting researchers to design PM-based key-value stores. However, existing PM-based key-value stores lack awareness of the Non-Uniform Memory Access (NUMA) architecture on PM, where accessing PM on remote NUMA sockets is considerably slower than accessing local PM. This NUMA-unawareness results in sub-optimal performance when scaling on NUMA. Although DRAM caching alleviates this issue, existing cache policies ignore the performance disparity between remote and local PM accesses, keeping remote PM access as a performance bottleneck when scaling PM stores on NUMA. Furthermore, creating hot data views in each socket's PM fails to eliminate remote PM writes and, worse, induces additional local PM writes. This paper presents NStore, a high-performance NUMA-aware key-value store for the PM-DRAM hybrid memory. NStore introduces a NUMA-aware cache replacement strategy, called Remote Access First (RAF) cache in DRAM, to minimize remote PM accesses. In addition, NStore deploys Nlog, a write-optimized log-structured persistent storage, purposed to eliminate remote PM writes. NStore further mitigates the NUMA impacts through localized scan operations, efficient garbage collection, and multi-thread recovery for Nlog. Evaluations show that NStore outperforms state-of-the-art PM-based key-value stores, achieving up to 13.9$\times$and 11.2$\times$higher write and read throughput, respectively. Zhonghua Wang 0001, Kai Lu 0002, Jiguang Wan 0001, Hong Jiang 0001, Zeyang Zhao, Biliang Lai, Guokuan Li, Changsheng Xie 0001 |
IEEE Trans. Computers | 5 |
| 2024 | ARTrackV2: Prompting Autoregressive Tracker Where to Look and How to DescribeabstractWe present ARTrackV2, which integrates two pivotal aspects of tracking: determining where to look (localization) and how to describe (appearance analysis) the target object across video frames. Building on the foundation of its predecessor, ARTrackV2 extends the concept by introducing a unified generative framework to “read out” object's trajectory and “retell” its appearance in an autoregressive manner. This approach fosters a time-continuous methodology that models the joint evolution of motion and visual features, guided by previous estimates. Furthermore, ARTrackV2 stands out for its efficiency and simplicity, obviating the less efficient intra-frame autoregression and hand-tuned parameters for appearance updates. Despite its simplicity, ARTrackV2 achieves state-of-the-art performance on prevailing benchmark datasets while demonstrating a remarkable efficiency improvement. In particular, ARTrackV2 achieves an AO score of 79. 5% on GOT-10k and an AUC of 86. 1% on TrackingNet while being 3.6× faster than ARTrack. Yifan Bai 0001, Zeyang Zhao, Yihong Gong, Xing Wei 0001 |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2024 | Projecting Points to Axes: Oriented Object Detection via Point-Axis Representation
Zeyang Zhao, Qilong Xue, Yuhang He 0001, Yifan Bai 0001, Xing Wei 0001, Yihong Gong |
ECCV (28) | 1 |
| 2023 | Compact Convolutional Transformer for Landslide Susceptibility MappingabstractHigh-quality landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) is an important step in landslide disaster prevention and mitigation. In order to explore and evaluate the practical performance of a convolutional and transformer hybrid model in landslide susceptibility mapping, this study selected 202 historical landslides and seven conditioning factors to construct a geographical spatial dataset for LSM. The hybrid model called the compact convolutional transformer (CCT) model was used to perform LSM in the Three Gorges Reservoir area in China, and it was compared with vision transformer (ViT), convolutional neural network (CNN), and residual network (ResNet). The results show that the CCT model has the best overall performance, achieving the highest accuracy in multiple statistical metrics, and improving the accuracy of LSM. This study provides a new approach for obtaining high-quality LSM using a convolutional and transformer hybrid model. Zeyang Zhao, Tao Chen 0004, Jun Li 0009 |
IGARSS | 1 |
| 2023 | PlanE: Representation Learning over Planar GraphsabstractGraph neural networks are prominent models for representation learning over graphs, where the idea is to iteratively compute representations of nodes of an input graph through a series of transformations in such a way that the learned graph function is isomorphism-invariant on graphs, which makes the learned representations graph invariants. On the other hand, it is well-known that graph invariants learned by these class of models are incomplete: there are pairs of non-isomorphic graphs which cannot be distinguished by standard graph neural networks. This is unsurprising given the computational difficulty of graph isomorphism testing on general graphs, but the situation begs to differ for special graph classes, for which efficient graph isomorphism testing algorithms are known, such as planar graphs. The goal of this work is to design architectures for efficiently learning complete invariants of planar graphs. Inspired by the classical planar graph isomorphism algorithm of Hopcroft and Tarjan, we propose PlanE as a framework for planar representation learning. PlanE includes architectures which can learn complete invariants over planar graphs while remaining practically scalable. We empirically validate the strong performance of the resulting model architectures on well-known planar graph benchmarks, achieving multiple state-of-the-art results. Radoslav Dimitrov, Zeyang Zhao, Ralph Abboud, Ismail Ilkan Ceylan |
NeurIPS | 2 |