Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Luhuan Wu
dblp:245/5016
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 5 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 56% Generative modeling · 43% Optimization for machine learning · 2% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Reverse Diffusion Sequential Monte Carlo Samplers · NeurIPS 2025 Practical and Asymptotically Exact Conditional Sampling in Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
sequential monte carlo |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Reverse Diffusion Sequential Monte Carlo Samplers · NeurIPS 2025 Practical and Asymptotically Exact Conditional Sampling in Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes
gaussian process |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Variational nearest neighbor Gaussian process · ICML 2022 Bias-Free Scalable Gaussian Processes via Randomized Truncations · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
scalable gaussian process |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Variational nearest neighbor Gaussian process · ICML 2022 Bias-Free Scalable Gaussian Processes via Randomized Truncations · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
diffusion sampling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Reverse Diffusion Sequential Monte Carlo Samplers · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
monte carlo methods |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Reverse Diffusion Sequential Monte Carlo Samplers · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
score-based sampling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Reverse Diffusion Sequential Monte Carlo Samplers · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
conditional diffusion model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Practical and Asymptotically Exact Conditional Sampling in Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Variational nearest neighbor Gaussian process · ICML 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular informatics
molecular design |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Practical and Asymptotically Exact Conditional Sampling in Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
protein design |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Practical and Asymptotically Exact Conditional Sampling in Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Bias-Free Scalable Gaussian Processes via Randomized Truncations · ICML 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sequential monte carlo · 2.2twisting · 1.3score estimation · 0.9importance sampling · 0.9variational inference · 0.6stochastic optimization · 0.6randomized truncation estimator · 0.5random fourier features · 0.5conjugate gradient · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Reverse Diffusion Sequential Monte Carlo SamplersabstractWe propose a novel sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) method for sampling from unnormalized target distributions based on a reverse denoising diffusion process. While recent diffusion-based samplers simulate the reverse diffusion using approximate score functions, they can suffer from accumulating errors due to time discretization and imperfect score estimation. In this work, we introduce a principled SMC framework that formalizes diffusion-based samplers as proposals while systematically correcting for their biases. The core idea is to construct informative intermediate target distributions that progressively steer the sampling trajectory toward the final target distribution.
Although ideal intermediate targets are intractable, we develop \emph{exact approximations} using quantities from the score estimation-based proposal, without requiring additional model training or inference overhead. The resulting sampler, termed \textit{\ourmethodfull}, enables consistent sampling and unbiased estimation of the target's normalization constant under mild conditions. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on a range of synthetic targets and real-world Bayesian inference problems. Luhuan Wu, Christian A. Naesseth, John P. Cunningham |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2024 | Posterior Uncertainty Quantification in Neural Networks using Data AugmentationabstractIn this paper, we approach the problem of uncertainty quantification in deep learning through a predictive framework, which captures uncertainty in model parameters by specifying our assumptions about the predictive distribution of unseen future data. Under this view, we show that deep ensembling (Lakshminarayanan et al., 2017) is a fundamentally mis-specified model class, since it assumes that future data are supported on existing observations only—a situation rarely encountered in practice. To address this limitation, we propose MixupMP, a method that constructs a more realistic predictive distribution using popular data augmentation techniques. MixupMP operates as a drop-in replacement for deep ensembles, where each ensemble member is trained on a random simulation from this predictive distribution. Grounded in the recently-proposed framework of Martingale posteriors (Fong et al., 2023), MixupMP returns samples from an implicitly defined Bayesian posterior. Our empirical analysis showcases that MixupMP achieves superior predictive per- formance and uncertainty quantification on various image classification datasets, when compared with existing Bayesian and non-Bayesian approaches. Luhuan Wu, Sinead Williamson |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2023 | Practical and Asymptotically Exact Conditional Sampling in Diffusion ModelsabstractDiffusion models have been successful on a range of conditional generation tasks including molecular design and text-to-image generation. However, these achievements have primarily depended on task-specific conditional training or error-prone heuristic approximations. Ideally, a conditional generation method should provide exact samples for a broad range of conditional distributions without requiring task-specific training. To this end, we introduce the Twisted Diffusion Sampler, or TDS. TDS is a sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) algorithm that targets the conditional distributions of diffusion models through simulating a set of weighted particles. The main idea is to use twisting, an SMC technique that enjoys good computational efficiency, to incorporate heuristic approximations without compromising asymptotic exactness. We first find in simulation and in conditional image generation tasks that TDS provides a computational statistical trade-off, yielding more accurate approximations with many particles but with empirical improvements over heuristics with as few as two particles. We then turn to motif-scaffolding, a core task in protein design, using a TDS extension to Riemannian diffusion models; on benchmark tasks, TDS allows flexible conditioning criteria and often outperforms the state-of-the-art, conditionally trained model. Code can be found in https://github.com/blt2114/twisted_diffusion_sampler Luhuan Wu, Brian L. Trippe, Christian A. Naesseth, David M. Blei, John P. Cunningham |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Variational nearest neighbor Gaussian processabstractVariational approximations to Gaussian processes (GPs) typically use a small set of inducing points to form a low-rank approximation to the covariance matrix. In this work, we instead exploit a sparse approximation of the precision matrix. We propose variational nearest neighbor Gaussian process (VNNGP), which introduces a prior that only retains correlations within $K$ nearest-neighboring observations, thereby inducing sparse precision structure. Using the variational framework, VNNGP’s objective can be factorized over both observations and inducing points, enabling stochastic optimization with a time complexity of $O(K^3)$. Hence, we can arbitrarily scale the inducing point size, even to the point of putting inducing points at every observed location. We compare VNNGP to other scalable GPs through various experiments, and demonstrate that VNNGP (1) can dramatically outperform low-rank methods, and (2) is less prone to overfitting than other nearest neighbor methods. Luhuan Wu, Geoff Pleiss, John P. Cunningham |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | Hierarchical Inducing Point Gaussian Process for Inter-domian ObservationsabstractWe examine the general problem of inter-domain Gaussian Processes (GPs): problems where the GP realization and the noisy observations of that realization lie on different domains. When the mapping between those domains is linear, such as integration or differentiation, inference is still closed form. However, many of the scaling and approximation techniques that our community has developed do not apply to this setting. In this work, we introduce the hierarchical inducing point GP (HIP-GP), a scalable inter-domain GP inference method that enables us to improve the approximation accuracy by increasing the number of inducing points to the millions. HIP-GP, which relies on inducing points with grid structure and a stationary kernel assumption, is suitable for low-dimensional problems. In developing HIP-GP, we introduce (1) a fast whitening strategy, and (2) a novel preconditioner for conjugate gradients which can be helpful in general GP settings. Luhuan Wu, Lauren Anderson, Geoff Pleiss, David M. Blei, John P. Cunningham |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2021 | Bias-Free Scalable Gaussian Processes via Randomized TruncationsabstractScalable Gaussian Process methods are computationally attractive, yet introduce modeling biases that require rigorous study. This paper analyzes two common techniques: early truncated conjugate gradients (CG) and random Fourier features (RFF). We find that both methods introduce a systematic bias on the learned hyperparameters: CG tends to underfit while RFF tends to overfit. We address these issues using randomized truncation estimators that eliminate bias in exchange for increased variance. In the case of RFF, we show that the bias-to-variance conversion is indeed a trade-off: the additional variance proves detrimental to optimization. However, in the case of CG, our unbiased learning procedure meaningfully outperforms its biased counterpart with minimal additional computation. Our code is available at https://github.com/ cunningham-lab/RTGPS. Andres Potapczynski, Luhuan Wu, Dan Biderman, Geoff Pleiss, John P. Cunningham |
ICML | 2 |
| 2020 | Variational Objectives for Markovian Dynamics with Backward Simulation
Antonio Khalil Moretti, Luhuan Wu, Iddo Drori, Itsik Pe'er |
ECAI | 3 |