Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Parshan Pakiman
dblp:245/5998
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0001-5372-9135ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
inverse reinforcement learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | SMOILE: A Shopper Marketing Optimization and Inverse Learning Engine · KDD 2019 |
Computational social science and digital humanities › marketing
marketing optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | SMOILE: A Shopper Marketing Optimization and Inverse Learning Engine · KDD 2019 |
Mathematical optimization
constrained optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | SMOILE: A Shopper Marketing Optimization and Inverse Learning Engine · KDD 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regression · 1.1inverse reinforcement learning · 1.1constrained optimization · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | SMOILE: A Shopper Marketing Optimization and Inverse Learning EngineabstractProduct brands employ shopper marketing (SM) strategies to convert shoppers along the path to purchase. Traditional marketing mix models (MMMs), which leverage regression techniques and historical data, can be used to predict the component of sales lift due to SM tactics. The resulting predictive model is a critical input to plan future SM strategies. The implementation of traditional MMMs, however, requires significant ad-hoc manual intervention due to their limited flexibility in (i) explicitly capturing the temporal link between decisions; (ii) accounting for the interaction between business rules and past (sales and decision) data during the attribution of lift to SM; and (iii) ensuring that future decisions adhere to business rules. These issues necessitate MMMs with tailored structures for specific products and retailers, each requiring significant hand-engineering to achieve satisfactory performance -- a major implementation challenge. We propose an SM Optimization and Inverse Learning Engine (SMOILE) that combines optimization and inverse reinforcement learning to streamline implementation. SMOILE learns a model of lift by viewing SM tactic choice as a sequential process, leverages inverse reinforcement learning to explicitly couple sales and decision data, and employs an optimization approach to handle a wide-array of business rules. Using a unique dataset containing sales and SM spend information across retailers and products, we illustrate how SMOILE standardizes the use of data to prescribe future SM decisions. We also track an industry benchmark to showcase the importance of encoding SM lift and decision structures to mitigate spurious results when uncovering the impact of SM decisions. Abhilash Reddy Chenreddy, Parshan Pakiman, Selvaprabu Nadarajah, C. Ranganathan, Rick Abens |
KDD | 2 |