Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alireza Mollaalizadehbahnemiri

dblp:245/7543 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 56% Empirical software engineering · 44%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification
0.412019
On using machine learning to identify knowledge in API reference documentation · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2019
Software maintenance and evolution › software documentation
API documentation analysis
0.412019
On using machine learning to identify knowledge in API reference documentation · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2019
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories
0.412019
On using machine learning to identify knowledge in API reference documentation · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2019
Software maintenance and evolution › software documentation
API documentation
0.112019
On using machine learning to identify knowledge in API reference documentation · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

text classification · 0.8deep learning · 0.8SVM · 0.8k-NN · 0.4KNN · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 On using machine learning to identify knowledge in API reference documentation
abstract
Using API reference documentation like JavaDoc is an integral part of software development. Previous research introduced a grounded taxonomy that organizes API documentation knowledge in 12 types, including knowledge about the Functionality, Structure, and Quality of an API. We study how well modern text classification approaches can automatically identify documentation containing specific knowledge types. We compared conventional machine learning (k-NN and SVM) with deep learning approaches trained on manually-annotated Java and .NET API documentation (n = 5,574). When classifying the knowledge types individually (i.e., multiple binary classifiers) the best AUPRC was up to 87
Davide Fucci, Alireza Mollaalizadehbahnemiri, Walid Maalej
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE2