EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yifan Ethan Xu
dblp:245/7578
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-7539-4492ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 5 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
4 papers |
Data integration and cleaning · 55% Knowledge graphs · 45% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-AI interaction · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Graph learning · 57% Information extraction and text analysis · 43% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-AI interaction
intelligent assistant |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Next-Generation Intelligent Assistants Leveraging LLM Techniques · KDD 2023 |
Human-AI interaction › intelligent assistant
virtual assistants |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards Next-Generation Intelligent Assistants Leveraging LLM Techniques · KDD 2023 |
Data integration and cleaning › data preprocessing › data cleaning
error detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | PGE: Robust Product Graph Embedding Learning for Error Detection · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2022 |
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph embedding |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | PGE: Robust Product Graph Embedding Learning for Error Detection · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2022 |
Data integration and cleaning › data quality
data validation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Automatic Validation of Textual Attribute Values in E-commerce Catalog by Learning with Limited Labeled Data · KDD 2020 |
Knowledge graphs
knowledge graph construction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | AutoKnow: Self-Driving Knowledge Collection for Products of Thousands of Types · KDD 2020 |
Knowledge graphs › domain-specific knowledge graph
product knowledge graph |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | AutoKnow: Self-Driving Knowledge Collection for Products of Thousands of Types · KDD 2020 |
Data integration and cleaning
data quality |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Efficient Knowledge Graph Accuracy Evaluation · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2019 |
Knowledge graphs › knowledge graph quality
knowledge graph accuracy evaluation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Efficient Knowledge Graph Accuracy Evaluation · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2019 |
Data integration and cleaning
truth discovery |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Efficient Knowledge Graph Accuracy Evaluation · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
text-graph joint learning · 1.1knowledge graph embedding · 1.1limited labeled data learning · 0.9deep neural network · 0.9large language model · 0.7self-supervised learning · 0.4stratified sampling · 0.4reservoir sampling · 0.4cluster sampling · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Head-to-Tail: How Knowledgeable are Large Language Models (LLMs)? A.K.A. Will LLMs Replace Knowledge Graphs?abstractKai Sun, Yifan Xu, Hanwen Zha, Yue Liu, Xin Luna Dong. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024. Kai Sun 0006, Yifan Ethan Xu, Hanwen Zha, Xin Dong 0001 |
NAACL-HLT | 2 |
| 2023 | Towards Next-Generation Intelligent Assistants Leveraging LLM TechniquesabstractVirtual Intelligent Assistants take user requests in the voice form, perform actions such as setting an alarm, turning on a light, and answering a question, and provide answers or confirmations in the voice form or through other channels such as a screen. Assistants have become prevalent in the past decade, and users have been taking services from assistants like Amazon Alexa, Apple Siri, Google Assistant, and Microsoft Cortana. Xin Dong 0001, Seungwhan Moon, Yifan Ethan Xu, Kshitiz Malik, Zhou Yu 0005 |
KDD | 3 |
| 2022 | PGE: Robust Product Graph Embedding Learning for Error DetectionabstractAlthough product graphs (PGs) have gained increasing attentions in recent years for their successful applications in product search and recommendations, the extensive power of PGs can be limited by the inevitable involvement of various kinds of errors. Thus, it is critical to validate the correctness of triples in PGs to improve their reliability. Knowledge graph (KG) embedding methods have strong error detection abilities. Yet, existing KG embedding methods may not be directly applicable to a PG due to its distinct characteristics: (1) PG contains rich textual signals, which necessitates a joint exploration of both text information and graph structure; (2) PG contains a large number of attribute triples, in which attribute values are represented by free texts. Since free texts are too flexible to define entities in KGs, traditional way to map entities to their embeddings using ids is no longer appropriate for attribute value representation; (3) Noisy triples in a PG mislead the embedding learning and significantly hurt the performance of error detection. To address the aforementioned challenges, we propose an end-to-end noise-tolerant embedding learning framework, PGE, to jointly leverage both text information and graph structure in PG to learn embeddings for error detection. Experimental results on real-world product graph demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework comparing with the state-of-the-art approaches. Kewei Cheng, Yifan Ethan Xu, Xin Dong 0001, Yizhou Sun |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 3 |
| 2020 | AutoKnow: Self-Driving Knowledge Collection for Products of Thousands of TypesabstractCan one build a knowledge graph (KG) for all products in the world? Knowledge graphs have firmly established themselves as valuable sources of information for search and question answering, and it is natural to wonder if a KG can contain information about products offered at online retail sites. There have been several successful examples of generic KGs, but organizing information about products poses many additional challenges, including sparsity and noise of structured data for products, complexity of the domain with millions of product types and thousands of attributes, heterogeneity across large number of categories, as well as large and constantly growing number of products. Xin Dong 0001, Xiang He 0007, Andrey Kan, Yan Liang 0004, Jun Ma 0029, Yifan Ethan Xu, Tong Zhao 0002, Gabriel Blanco Saldana, Saurabh Deshpande, Alexandre Michetti Manduca, Jay Ren, Surender Pal Singh, Fan Xiao 0001, Haw-Shiuan Chang, Giannis Karamanolakis, Yuning Mao, Yaqing Wang 0001, Christos Faloutsos, Andrew McCallum, Jiawei Han 0001 |
KDD | 7 |
| 2020 | Automatic Validation of Textual Attribute Values in E-commerce Catalog by Learning with Limited Labeled DataabstractProduct catalogs are valuable resources for eCommerce website. In the catalog, a product is associated with multiple attributes whose values are short texts, such as product name, brand, functionality and flavor. Usually individual retailers self-report these key values, and thus the catalog information unavoidably contains noisy facts. It is very important to validate the correctness of these values in order to improve shopper experiences and enable more effective product recommendation. Due to the huge volume of products, an effective automatic validation approach is needed. In this paper, we propose to develop an automatic validation approach that verifies the correctness of textual attribute values for products. This can be formulated as a task as cross-checking a textual attribute value against product profile, which is a short textual description of the product on eCommerce website. Although existing deep neural network models have shown success in conducting cross-checking between two pieces of texts, their success has to be dependent upon a large set of quality labeled data, which are hard to obtain in this validation task: products span a variety of categories. Due to the category difference, annotation has to be done on all the categories, which is impossible to achieve in real practice. Yaqing Wang 0001, Yifan Ethan Xu, Xin Dong 0001, Jing Gao 0004 |
KDD | 2 |
| 2019 | Efficient Knowledge Graph Accuracy EvaluationabstractEstimation of the accuracy of a large-scale knowledge graph (KG) often requires humans to annotate samples from the graph. How to obtain statistically meaningful estimates for accuracy evaluation while keeping human annotation costs low is a problem critical to the development cycle of a KG and its practical applications. Surprisingly, this challenging problem has largely been ignored in prior research. To address the problem, this paper proposes an efficient sampling and evaluation framework, which aims to provide quality accuracy evaluation with strong statistical guarantee while minimizing human efforts. Motivated by the properties of the annotation cost function observed in practice, we propose the use of cluster sampling to reduce the overall cost. We further apply weighted and two-stage sampling as well as stratification for better sampling designs. We also extend our framework to enable efficient incremental evaluation on evolving KG, introducing two solutions based on stratified sampling and a weighted variant of reservoir sampling. Extensive experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our proposed solution. Compared to baseline approaches, our best solutions can provide up to 60% cost reduction on static KG evaluation and up to 80% cost reduction on evolving KG evaluation, without loss of evaluation quality. Junyang Gao, Yifan Ethan Xu, Bunyamin Sisman, Xin Dong 0001, Jun Yang 0001 |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 3 |