Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jingyoung Kim

dblp:245/7596 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-2072-8878ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 67% Program analysis · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing › test coverage › code coverage
branch coverage
0.612022
Enhancing Dynamic Symbolic Execution by Automatically Learning Search Heuristics · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2022
Program analysis › symbolic execution
dynamic symbolic execution
0.612022
Enhancing Dynamic Symbolic Execution by Automatically Learning Search Heuristics · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2022
Software testing
test coverage
0.612022
Enhancing Dynamic Symbolic Execution by Automatically Learning Search Heuristics · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

parametric search heuristic · 0.6machine learning · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Enhancing Dynamic Symbolic Execution by Automatically Learning Search Heuristics
abstract
We present a technique to automatically generate search heuristics for dynamic symbolic execution. A key challenge in dynamic symbolic execution is how to effectively explore the program's execution paths to achieve high code coverage in a limited time budget. Dynamic symbolic execution employs a search heuristic to address this challenge, which favors exploring particular types of paths that are most likely to maximize the final coverage. However, manually designing a good search heuristic is nontrivial and typically ends up with suboptimal and unstable outcomes. The goal of this paper is to overcome this shortcoming of dynamic symbolic execution by automatically learning search heuristics. We define a class of search heuristics, namely a parametric search heuristic, and present an algorithm that efficiently finds an optimal heuristic for each subject program. Experimental results with industrial-strength symbolic execution tools (e.g., KLEE) show that our technique can successfully generate search heuristics that significantly outperform existing manually-crafted heuristics in terms of branch coverage and bug-finding.
Sooyoung Cha, Seongjoon Hong, Jiseong Bak, Jingyoung Kim, Hakjoo Oh
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.4