Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jingyoung Kim
dblp:245/7596
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-2072-8878ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software testing · 67% Program analysis · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Software testing › test coverage › code coverage
branch coverage |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Enhancing Dynamic Symbolic Execution by Automatically Learning Search Heuristics · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2022 |
Program analysis › symbolic execution
dynamic symbolic execution |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Enhancing Dynamic Symbolic Execution by Automatically Learning Search Heuristics · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2022 |
Software testing
test coverage |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Enhancing Dynamic Symbolic Execution by Automatically Learning Search Heuristics · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
parametric search heuristic · 0.6machine learning · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Enhancing Dynamic Symbolic Execution by Automatically Learning Search HeuristicsabstractWe present a technique to automatically generate search heuristics for dynamic symbolic execution. A key challenge in dynamic symbolic execution is how to effectively explore the program's execution paths to achieve high code coverage in a limited time budget. Dynamic symbolic execution employs a search heuristic to address this challenge, which favors exploring particular types of paths that are most likely to maximize the final coverage. However, manually designing a good search heuristic is nontrivial and typically ends up with suboptimal and unstable outcomes. The goal of this paper is to overcome this shortcoming of dynamic symbolic execution by automatically learning search heuristics. We define a class of search heuristics, namely a parametric search heuristic, and present an algorithm that efficiently finds an optimal heuristic for each subject program. Experimental results with industrial-strength symbolic execution tools (e.g., KLEE) show that our technique can successfully generate search heuristics that significantly outperform existing manually-crafted heuristics in terms of branch coverage and bug-finding. Sooyoung Cha, Seongjoon Hong, Jiseong Bak, Jingyoung Kim, Hakjoo Oh |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 4 |