EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Peter Deaville
dblp:245/8209
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0001-8029-1060ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Memory systems · 75% Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 25% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Memory systems
in-memory computing |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Statistical computing framework and demonstration for in-memory computing systems · DAC 2022 |
Memory systems
processing-in-memory |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Statistical computing framework and demonstration for in-memory computing systems · DAC 2022 |
Memory systems › processing-in-memory
processing-in-MRAM |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Statistical computing framework and demonstration for in-memory computing systems · DAC 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
progressive training · 0.6noise modeling · 0.6contrastive loss · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Statistical computing framework and demonstration for in-memory computing systemsabstractWith the increasing importance of data-intensive workloads, such as AI, in-memory computing (IMC) has demonstrated substantial energy/throughput benefits by addressing both compute and data-movement/accessing costs, and holds significant further promise by its ability to leverage emerging forms of highly-scaled memory technologies. However, IMC fundamentally derives its advantages through parallelism, which poses a trade-off with SNR, whereby variations and noise in nanoscaled devices directly limit possible gains. In this work, we propose novel training approaches to improve model tolerance to noise via a contrastive loss function and a progressive training procedure. We further propose a methodology for modeling and calibrating hardware noise, efficiently at the level of a macro operation and through a limited number of hardware measurements. The approaches are demonstrated on a fabricated MRAM-based IMC prototype in 22nm FD-SOI, together with a neural network training framework implemented in PyTorch. For CIFAR-10/100 classifications, model performance is restored to the level of ideal noise-free execution, and generalized performance of the trained model deployed across different chips is demonstrated. Bonan Zhang, Peter Deaville, Naveen Verma |
DAC | 2 |