Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ally Zhang

dblp:245/8651 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Vision and language · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual reasoning
compositional visual reasoning
0.412019
A Corpus for Reasoning about Natural Language Grounded in Photographs · ACL (1) 2019
Computer vision › Vision and language
visual reasoning
0.412019
A Corpus for Reasoning about Natural Language Grounded in Photographs · ACL (1) 2019
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language dataset
0.112019
A Corpus for Reasoning about Natural Language Grounded in Photographs · ACL (1) 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

crowdsourcing · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 A Corpus for Reasoning about Natural Language Grounded in Photographs
abstract
We introduce a new dataset for joint reasoning about natural language and images, with a focus on semantic diversity, compositionality, and visual reasoning challenges.The data contains 107,292 examples of English sentences paired with web photographs.The task is to determine whether a natural language caption is true about a pair of photographs.We crowdsource the data using sets of visually rich images and a compare-and-contrast task to elicit linguistically diverse language.Qualitative analysis shows the data requires compositional joint reasoning, including about quantities, comparisons, and relations.Evaluation using state-of-the-art visual reasoning methods shows the data presents a strong challenge.* Contributed equally.† Work done as an undergraduate at Cornell University. 1 In parts of this paper, we use the term compositional differently than it is commonly used in linguistics to refer to reasoning that requires composition.This type of reasoning often manifests itself in highly compositional language.
Alane Suhr, Stephanie Zhou, Ally Zhang, Iris Zhang, Huajun Bai, Yoav Artzi
ACL (1)3