EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
K. Nagaraju 0001
dblp:246/1676 · also Nagaraju Karinagappa
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-2358-2563ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Image recognition and object detection · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › visual explanation
class activation map |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | LowRank-CAM: A Computationally Efficient and Interpretable Framework for Medical Image Analysis (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | LowRank-CAM: A Computationally Efficient and Interpretable Framework for Medical Image Analysis (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
medical image analysis |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | LowRank-CAM: A Computationally Efficient and Interpretable Framework for Medical Image Analysis (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
singular value decomposition · 1.0low-rank approximation · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | LowRank-CAM: A Computationally Efficient and Interpretable Framework for Medical Image Analysis (Student Abstract)abstractDeep learning has advanced medical imaging, but limited interpretability hinders clinical adoption. Class activation maps (CAM) provide visual explanations, yet methods such as Score-CAM are computationally expensive, requiring a forward pass for each activation map and limiting real-time applicability despite their high fidelity. To overcome this limitation, LowRank-CAM is proposed, which aggregates activation maps into a global matrix and applies singular value decomposition (SVD) to extract dominant spatial modes. The resulting top-r low-rank attention masks, with r Gokaramaiah Thota, K. Nagaraju 0001, Korra Sathya Babu |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2026 | A robust and efficient approach using Aggregated-FlexiNet for interpretable musculoskeletal radiograph classification
Gokaramaiah Thota, K. Nagaraju 0001, Korra Sathya Babu, Viswanath Pulabaigari |
Pattern Recognit. | 2 |
| 2024 | SVD-Grad-CAM: Singular Value Decomposition filtered Gradient Weighted Class Activation MapabstractThe class activation map (CAM) is useful in identifying significant image features that the convolutional neural network (CNN) model is considering while making the prediction. This is critical especially in medical diagnosis like scenarios. However, existing gradient-based methods like Grad-CAM often produce low-quality visualization results due to gradient errors despite their computational efficiency. On the other hand, non-gradient methods like Score-CAM produce quality visualization that comes with high computational costs. The proposed method SVD filters Grad-CAM (SVD-Grad-CAM), which leverages singular value decomposition (SVD) to overcome the limitations of Grad-CAM. SVD-Grad-CAM filters gradients within the gradient matrix to compute the weight of the feature map for a specific class. This filtering process is achieved by selecting the top k principal components from the SVD decomposition, which discards less important patterns and potential error data. Consequently, SVD-Grad-CAM enhances the quality of Grad-CAM by reducing the clutter of multiple region highlights. The MURA dataset, focusing on elbow study type, is utilized to assess CAM visualization quality, with a DenseNet-169 CNN model fine-tuned via transfer learning. A total of 564 validation radiographs are used in empirical comparison, showing that SVD-Grad-CAM improves average drop, average increase, maximum coherency, and Average DCC by 30%, 21.67%, 19.91% and 22.56% respectively, in comparison to Grad-CAM. Code:: https://github.com/ramaiahthota02/SVD-Grad-CAM-v1.git Gokaramaiah Thota, K. Nagaraju 0001, Korra Sathya Babu |
ICPR (12) | 2 |