Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jon A Yamato

dblp:246/1866 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software testing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › structural variation
copy number variation
0.412019
CNValidator: validating somatic copy-number inference · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.412019
CNValidator: validating somatic copy-number inference · Bioinform. 2019
Software testing
software validation
0.112019
CNValidator: validating somatic copy-number inference · Bioinform. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

haplotype coherence analysis · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 CNValidator: validating somatic copy-number inference
abstract
MOTIVATION: CNValidator assesses the quality of somatic copy-number calls based on coherency of haplotypes across multiple samples from the same individual. It is applicable to any copy-number calling algorithm, which makes calls independently for each sample. This test is useful in assessing the accuracy of copy-number calls, as well as choosing among alternative copy-number algorithms or tuning parameter values. RESULTS: On a dataset of somatic samples from individuals with Barrett's Esophagus, CNValidator provided feedback on the correctness of sample ploidy calls and also detected data quality issues. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: CNValidator is available on GitHub at https://github.com/kuhnerlab/CNValidator. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Lucian P. Smith, Jon A Yamato, Mary K. Kuhner
Bioinform.2