Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shixin Yao
dblp:246/3101
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-8670-7872ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › clustering
alternative clustering |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Multi-View Multiple Clustering · IJCAI 2019 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Multi-View Multiple Clustering · IJCAI 2019 |
Data mining › clustering
co-clustering |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Multi-View Multiple Clustering · IJCAI 2019 |
Data mining › clustering
multi-view clustering |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Multi-View Multiple Clustering · IJCAI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multi-view self-representation learning · 0.4matrix factorization · 0.4hilbert-schmidt independence criterion · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | A clustering ensemble algorithm for handling deep embeddings using cluster confidenceabstractAbstract Clustering ensemble, which aims to learn a robust consensus clustering from multiple weak base clusterings, has achieved promising performance on various applications. With the development of big data, the scale and complexity of data is constantly increasing. However, most existing clustering ensemble methods typically employ shallow clustering algorithms to generate base clusterings. When confronted with high-dimensional complex data, these shallow algorithms fail to fully utilize the intricate features present in the latent data space. As a result, the quality and diversity of the generated base clusterings are insufficient, thus affecting the subsequent ensemble performance. To address this issue, we propose a novel clustering ensemble algorithm for handling deep embeddings using cluster confidence (CEDECC) to improve the robustness and performance. Instead of simply combining deep clustering with clustering ensembles, we take into consideration that the performance of existing deep clustering methods heavily relies on the quality of low-dimensional embeddings generated during the pre-training stage. The quality of embeddings is unstable due to the influence of different initialization parameters. In CEDECC, specifically, we first construct a cluster confidence measure to evaluate the quality of low-dimensional embeddings. Typically, high-quality low-dimensional embeddings yield accurate clustering results with the same model parameters. Then, we utilize multiple high-quality embeddings to generate the base partitions. In the ensemble strategy phase, we consider the cluster-wise diversity and propose a novel ensemble cluster estimation to improve the overall consensus performance of the model. Extensive experiments on three benchmark datasets and four real-world biological datasets have demonstrated that the proposed CEDECC consistently outperforms the state-of-the-art clustering ensemble methods. Lingbin Zeng, Shixin Yao, Xinwang Liu 0002, Liquan Xiao |
Comput. J. | 2 |
| 2019 | Multi-View Multiple ClusteringabstractMultiple clustering aims at exploring alternative clusterings to organize the data into meaningful groups from different perspectives. Existing multiple clustering algorithms are designed for single-view data. We assume that the individuality and commonality of multi-view data can be leveraged to generate high-quality and diverse clusterings. To this end, we propose a novel multi-view multiple clustering (MVMC) algorithm. MVMC first adapts multi-view self-representation learning to explore the individuality encoding matrices and the shared commonality matrix of multi-view data. It additionally reduces the redundancy (i.e., enhancing the individuality) among the matrices using the Hilbert-Schmidt Independence Criterion (HSIC), and collects shared information by forcing the shared matrix to be smooth across all views. It then uses matrix factorization on the individual matrices, along with the shared matrix, to generate diverse clusterings of high-quality. We further extend multiple co-clustering on multi-view data and propose a solution called multi-view multiple co-clustering (MVMCC). Our empirical study shows that MVMC (MVMCC) can exploit multi-view data to generate multiple high-quality and diverse clusterings (co-clusterings), with superior performance to the state-of-the-art methods. Shixin Yao, Guoxian Yu, Jun Wang 0035, Carlotta Domeniconi, Xiangliang Zhang 0001 |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2019 | Discovering Multiple Co-Clusterings in SubspacesabstractMultiple clustering approaches aim at exploring alternative ways of organizing a given collection of data into various clusters from different perspectives. Although multiple one-way clusterings have been studied for more than a decade, how to explore alternative two-way clusterings (or co-clusterings) still remains an untouched topic, and an important one from an application standpoint. To solve this interesting but yet unexplored topic, we assume the existence of alternative co-clusterings embedded in different subspaces and simultaneously pursue multiple co-clusterings therein. We initially specify a subspace indicator matrix for each feature subspace, and employ matrix tri-factorization to seek row-wise and column-wise cluster indicator matrices in each subspace. To ensure diversity, we quantify the redundancy between pairwise co-clusterings using the cluster indicator and the subspace indicator matrices. We further introduce a unified objective function to simultaneously account for the two pursues, and an alternating optimization solution to iteratively optimize cluster indicator and feature indicator matrices. Our empirical study shows that the proposed solution can explore multiple meaningful co-clusterings and generally achieves better results than state-of-the-art methods. Shixin Yao, Guoxian Yu, Jun Wang 0035, Carlotta Domeniconi, Maozu Guo 0001 |
SDM | 1 |