Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Wenhan Xian
dblp:246/3134
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
6as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 6 first-author · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
9 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 59% Representation and self-supervised learning · 17% Efficient and distributed learning · 16% | |
| Theoretical computer science
4 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 30 heaviest of 33, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
nonconvex optimization |
1.9 | 3 | 2025 | Escaping Saddle Point Efficiently in Minimax and Bilevel Optimizations · IJCAI 2025 Finding Local Minima Efficiently in Decentralized Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 Asynchronous Stochastic Frank-Wolfe Algorithms for Non-Convex Optimization · IJCAI 2019 |
Mathematical optimization
minimax optimization |
1.4 | 2 | 2025 | Escaping Saddle Point Efficiently in Minimax and Bilevel Optimizations · IJCAI 2025 A Faster Decentralized Algorithm for Nonconvex Minimax Problems · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
communication-efficient training |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Communication-Efficient Adam-Type Algorithms for Distributed Data Mining · ICDM 2022 Communication-Efficient Frank-Wolfe Algorithm for Nonconvex Decentralized Distributed Learning · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › non-convex optimization
saddle point escape |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Escaping Saddle Point Efficiently in Minimax and Bilevel Optimizations · IJCAI 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
bilevel optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Escaping Saddle Point Efficiently in Minimax and Bilevel Optimizations · IJCAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convergence analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Delving into the Convergence of Generalized Smooth Minimax Optimization · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
minimax optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Delving into the Convergence of Generalized Smooth Minimax Optimization · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization › stability and generalization
uniform stability |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Delving into the Convergence of Generalized Smooth Minimax Optimization · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.7 | 2 | 2022 | Communication-Efficient Adam-Type Algorithms for Distributed Data Mining · ICDM 2022 A Faster Decentralized Algorithm for Nonconvex Minimax Problems · NeurIPS 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › distributed optimization
decentralized optimization |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Finding Local Minima Efficiently in Decentralized Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
saddle point escape |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Finding Local Minima Efficiently in Decentralized Optimization · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic optimization
adaptive gradient methods |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Communication-Efficient Adam-Type Algorithms for Distributed Data Mining · ICDM 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › convex optimization › composite optimization
stochastic composite optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Doubly Sparse Asynchronous Learning for Stochastic Composite Optimization · IJCAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
variance reduction |
0.5 | 2 | 2020 | A Unified q-Memorization Framework for Asynchronous Stochastic Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 Asynchronous Stochastic Frank-Wolfe Algorithms for Non-Convex Optimization · IJCAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › metric learning
deep metric learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Better Visual Data Similarities via New Grouplet Non-Euclidean Embedding · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
distributed optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Communication-Efficient Frank-Wolfe Algorithm for Nonconvex Decentralized Distributed Learning · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
embedding learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Better Visual Data Similarities via New Grouplet Non-Euclidean Embedding · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
metric learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Better Visual Data Similarities via New Grouplet Non-Euclidean Embedding · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › embedding learning › geometric embedding
non-euclidean embedding |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Better Visual Data Similarities via New Grouplet Non-Euclidean Embedding · ICCV 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › minimax optimization
nonconvex-strongly-concave optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A Faster Decentralized Algorithm for Nonconvex Minimax Problems · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic optimization
asynchronous stochastic optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Unified q-Memorization Framework for Asynchronous Stochastic Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
convex optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Unified q-Memorization Framework for Asynchronous Stochastic Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Unified q-Memorization Framework for Asynchronous Stochastic Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › regularized risk minimization
nonsmooth regularization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Unified q-Memorization Framework for Asynchronous Stochastic Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Unified q-Memorization Framework for Asynchronous Stochastic Optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › distributed optimization
asynchronous parallel optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Asynchronous Stochastic Frank-Wolfe Algorithms for Non-Convex Optimization · IJCAI 2019 |
Mathematical optimization › nonconvex optimization
non-convex constrained optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Asynchronous Stochastic Frank-Wolfe Algorithms for Non-Convex Optimization · IJCAI 2019 |
Mathematical optimization › frank-wolfe algorithm
stochastic frank-wolfe |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Asynchronous Stochastic Frank-Wolfe Algorithms for Non-Convex Optimization · IJCAI 2019 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Asynchronous Stochastic Frank-Wolfe Algorithms for Non-Convex Optimization · IJCAI 2019 |
Distributed systems
distributed optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Doubly Sparse Asynchronous Learning for Stochastic Composite Optimization · IJCAI 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variance reduction · 2.2stochastic gradient descent · 1.7second-order optimality · 1.7convergence analysis · 1.2stochastic gradient descent ascent · 0.8gradient descent ascent · 0.8SGDmax · 0.8GDmax · 0.8gradient-based methods · 0.7decentralized stochastic algorithm · 0.7sketching · 0.6gradient descent · 0.6gradient compression · 0.6asynchronous learning · 0.6active set · 0.6hybrid stochastic gradient descent · 0.5lock-free parallel implementation · 0.4frank-wolfe · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Escaping Saddle Point Efficiently in Minimax and Bilevel OptimizationsabstractHierarchical optimization is attracting significant attentions as it can be applied to a broad range of machine learning tasks. Recently, many algorithms are proposed to improve the theoretical results of minimax and bilevel optimizations. Among these works, a core issue that has not been well studies is to escape saddle point and find local minimum. In this paper, thus, we investigate the methods to achieve second-order optimality for nonconvex minimax and bilevel optimization. Specifically, we propose a new algorithm named PRGDA without the computation of second order derivative of the primal function. In nonconvex-strongly-concave minimax optimization, we prove that our algorithm can find a second-order stationary point with the gradient complexity that matches state-of-the-art result to find first-order stationary point. To our best knowledge, PRGDA is the first stochastic algorithm that is guaranteed to obtain the second-order stationary point for nonconvex minimax problems. In nonconvex-strongly-convex bilevel optimization, our method also achieves better gradient complexity to find local minimum. Finally, we conduct two numerical experiments to validate the performance of our new method. Wenhan Xian, Feihu Huang 0001, Heng Huang 0001 |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2024 | Delving into the Convergence of Generalized Smooth Minimax OptimizationabstractMinimax optimization is fundamental and important for enormous machine learning applications such as generative adversarial network, adversarial training, and robust optimization. Recently, a variety of minimax algorithms with theoretical guarantees based on Lipschitz smoothness have been proposed. However, these algorithms could fail to converge in practice because the requisite Lipschitz smooth condition may not hold even in some classic minimax problems. We will present some counterexamples to reveal this divergence issue. Thus, to fill this gap, we are motivated to delve into the convergence analysis of minimax algorithms under a relaxed Lipschitz smoothness condition, *i.e.*, generalized smoothness. We prove that variants of basic minimax optimization algorithms GDA, SGDA, GDmax and SGDmax can still converge in generalized smooth problems, and hence their theoretical guarantees can be extended to a wider range of applications. We also conduct a numerical experiment to validate the performance of our proposed algorithms. Wenhan Xian, Ziyi Chen 0002, Heng Huang 0001 |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Finding Local Minima Efficiently in Decentralized OptimizationabstractIn this paper we study the second-order optimality of decentralized stochastic algorithm that escapes saddle point efficiently for nonconvex optimization problems. We propose a new pure gradient-based decentralized stochastic algorithm PEDESTAL with a novel convergence analysis framework to address the technical challenges unique to the decentralized stochastic setting. Our method is the first decentralized stochastic algorithm to achieve second-order optimality with non-asymptotic analysis. We provide theoretical guarantees with the gradient complexity of $\tilde{O} (\epsilon^{-3})$ to find $O(\epsilon, \sqrt{\epsilon})$-second-order stationary point, which matches state-of-the-art results of centralized counterparts or decentralized methods to find first-order stationary point. We also conduct two decentralized tasks in our experiments, a matrix sensing task with synthetic data and a matrix factorization task with a real-world dataset to validate the performance of our method. Wenhan Xian, Heng Huang 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Communication-Efficient Adam-Type Algorithms for Distributed Data MiningabstractDistributed data mining is an emerging research topic to effectively and efficiently address hard data mining tasks using big data, which are partitioned and computed on different worker nodes, instead of one centralized server. Nevertheless, distributed learning methods often suffer from the communication bottleneck when the network bandwidth is limited or the size of model is large. To solve this critical issue, many gradient compression methods have been proposed recently to reduce the communication cost for multiple optimization algorithms. However, the current applications of gradient compression to adaptive gradient method, which is widely adopted because of its excellent performance to train DNNs, do not achieve the same ideal compression rate or convergence rate as Sketched-SGD. To address this limitation, in this paper, we propose a class of novel distributed Adam-type algorithms (i.e., SketchedAMSGrad) utilizing sketching, which is a promising compression technique that reduces the communication cost from O(d) to $O(\log(d))$ where d is the parameter dimension. In our theoretical analysis, we prove that our new algorithm achieves a fast convergence rate of $O\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{nT}}+\frac{1}{\left(k/d\right)^{2}T}\right)$ with the communication cost of $O(k\log(d))$ at each iteration. Compared with single-machine AMSGrad, our algorithm can achieve the linear speedup with respect to the number of workers n. The experimental result of training distributed DNN validates the performance of our algorithms. Wenhan Xian, Feihu Huang 0001, Heng Huang 0001 |
ICDM | 1 |
| 2022 | Doubly Sparse Asynchronous Learning for Stochastic Composite OptimizationabstractParallel optimization has become popular for large-scale learning in the past decades. However, existing methods suffer from huge computational costs, memory usage, and communication burden in high-dimensional scenarios. To address the challenges, we propose a new accelerated doubly sparse asynchronous learning (DSAL) method for stochastic composite optimization, under which two algorithms are proposed on shared-memory and distributed-memory architecture respectively, which only conducts gradient descent on the nonzero coordinates (data sparsity) and active set (model sparsity). The proposed algorithm can converge much faster and achieve significant speedup by simultaneously enjoying the sparsity of the model and data. Moreover, by sending the gradients on the active set only, communication costs are dramatically reduced. Theoretically, we prove that the proposed method achieves the linear convergence rate with lower overall complexity and can achieve the model identification in a finite number of iterations almost surely. Finally, extensive experimental results on benchmark datasets confirm the superiority of our proposed method. Runxue Bao, Xidong Wu, Wenhan Xian, Heng Huang 0001 |
IJCAI | 3 |
| 2021 | Communication-Efficient Frank-Wolfe Algorithm for Nonconvex Decentralized Distributed LearningabstractRecently decentralized optimization attracts much attention in machine learning because it is more communication-efficient than the centralized fashion. Quantization is a promising method to reduce the communication cost via cutting down the budget of each single communication using the gradient compression. To further improve the communication efficiency, more recently, some quantized decentralized algorithms have been studied. However, the quantized decentralized algorithm for nonconvex constrained machine learning problems is still limited. Frank-Wolfe (a.k.a., conditional gradient or projection-free) method is very efficient to solve many constrained optimization tasks, such as low-rank or sparsity-constrained models training. In this paper, to fill the gap of decentralized quantized constrained optimization, we propose a novel communication-efficient Decentralized Quantized Stochastic Frank-Wolfe (DQSFW) algorithm for non-convex constrained learning models. We first design a new counterexample to show that the vanilla decentralized quantized stochastic Frank-Wolfe algorithm usually diverges. Thus, we propose DQSFW algorithm with the gradient tracking technique to guarantee the method will converge to the stationary point of non-convex optimization safely. In our theoretical analysis, we prove that to achieve the stationary point our DQSFW algorithm achieves the same gradient complexity as the standard stochastic Frank-Wolfe and centralized Frank-Wolfe algorithms, but has much less communication cost. Experiments on matrix completion and model compression applications demonstrate the efficiency of our new algorithm. Wenhan Xian, Feihu Huang 0001, Heng Huang 0001 |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2021 | Learning Better Visual Data Similarities via New Grouplet Non-Euclidean EmbeddingabstractIn many computer vision problems, it is desired to learn the effective visual data similarity such that the prediction accuracy can be enhanced. Deep Metric Learning (DML) methods have been actively studied to measure the data similarity. Pair-based and proxy-based losses are the two major paradigms in DML. However, pair-wise methods involve expensive training costs, while proxy-based methods are less accurate in characterizing the relationships between data points. In this paper, we provide a hybrid grouplet paradigm, which inherits the accurate pair-wise relationship in pair-based methods and the efficient training in proxy-based methods. Our method also equips a non-Euclidean space to DML, which employs a hierarchical representation manifold. More specifically, we propose a unified graph perspective — different DML methods learn different local connecting patterns between data points. Based on the graph interpretation, we construct a flexible subset of data points, dubbed grouplet. Our grouplet doesn’t require explicit pair-wise relationships, instead, we encode the data relationships in an optimal transport problem regarding the proxies, and solve this problem via a differentiable implicit layer to automatically determine the relationships. Extensive experimental results show that our method significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines on several benchmarks. The ablation studies also verify the effectiveness of our method. Yanfu Zhang, Lei Luo 0001, Wenhan Xian, Heng Huang 0001 |
ICCV | 3 |
| 2021 | A Faster Decentralized Algorithm for Nonconvex Minimax ProblemsabstractIn this paper, we study the nonconvex-strongly-concave minimax optimization problem on decentralized setting. The minimax problems are attracting increasing attentions because of their popular practical applications such as policy evaluation and adversarial training. As training data become larger, distributed training has been broadly adopted in machine learning tasks. Recent research works show that the decentralized distributed data-parallel training techniques are specially promising, because they can achieve the efficient communications and avoid the bottleneck problem on the central node or the latency of low bandwidth network. However, the decentralized minimax problems were seldom studied in literature and the existing methods suffer from very high gradient complexity. To address this challenge, we propose a new faster decentralized algorithm, named as DM-HSGD, for nonconvex minimax problems by using the variance reduced technique of hybrid stochastic gradient descent. We prove that our DM-HSGD algorithm achieves stochastic first-order oracle (SFO) complexity of $O(\kappa^3 \epsilon^{-3})$ for decentralized stochastic nonconvex-strongly-concave problem to search an $\epsilon$-stationary point, which improves the exiting best theoretical results. Moreover, we also prove that our algorithm achieves linear speedup with respect to the number of workers. Our experiments on decentralized settings show the superior performance of our new algorithm. Wenhan Xian, Feihu Huang 0001, Yanfu Zhang, Heng Huang 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | A Unified q-Memorization Framework for Asynchronous Stochastic OptimizationabstractAsynchronous stochastic algorithms with various variance reduction techniques (such as SVRG, S2GD, SAGA and q-SAGA) are popular in solving large scale learning problems. Recently, Reddi et al. (2015) proposed an unified variance reduction framework (i.e., HSAG) to analyze the asynchronous stochastic gradient optimization. However, the HSAG framework cannot incorporate the S2GD technique, the analysis of the HSAG framework is limited to the SVRG and SAGA techniques on the smooth convex optimization. They did not analyze other important various variance techniques (e.g., S2GD and q-SAGA) and other important optimization problems (e.g., convex optimization with non-smooth regularization and non-convex optimization with cardinality constraint). In this paper, we bridge this gap by using an unified q-memorization framework for various variance reduction techniques (including SVRG, S2GD, SAGA, q-SAGA) to analyze asynchronous stochastic algorithms for three important optimization problems. Specifically, based on the q-memorization framework, 1) we propose an asynchronous stochastic gradient hard thresholding algorithm with q-memorization (AsySGHT-qM) for the non-convex optimization with cardinality constraint, and prove that the convergence rate of AsySGHT-qM before reaching the inherent error induced by gradient hard thresholding methods is geometric. 2) We propose an asynchronous stochastic proximal gradient algorithm (AsySPG-qM) for the convex optimization with non-smooth regularization, and prove that AsySPG-qM can achieve a linear convergence rate. 3) We propose an asynchronous stochastic gradient descent algorithm (AsySGD-qM) for the general non-convex optimization problem, and prove that AsySGD-qM can achieve a sublinear convergence rate to stationary points. The experimental results on various large-scale datasets confirm the fast convergence of our AsySGHT-qM, AsySPG-qM and AsySGD-qM through concrete realizations of SVRG and SAGA. Bin Gu 0001, Wenhan Xian, Zhouyuan Huo, Cheng Deng 0002, Heng Huang 0001 |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 2 |
| 2019 | Asynchronous Stochastic Frank-Wolfe Algorithms for Non-Convex OptimizationabstractAsynchronous parallel stochastic optimization for non-convex problems becomes more and more important in machine learning especially due to the popularity of deep learning. The Frank-Wolfe (a.k.a. conditional gradient) algorithms has regained much interest because of its projection-free property and the ability of handling structured constraints. However, our understanding of asynchronous stochastic Frank-Wolfe algorithms is extremely limited especially in the non-convex setting. To address this challenging problem, in this paper, we propose our asynchronous stochastic Frank-Wolfe algorithm (AsySFW) and its variance reduction version (AsySVFW) for solving the constrained non-convex optimization problems. More importantly, we prove the fast convergence rates of AsySFW and AsySVFW in the non-convex setting. To the best of our knowledge, AsySFW and AsySVFW are the first asynchronous parallel stochastic algorithms with convergence guarantees for solving the constrained non-convex optimization problems. The experimental results on real high-dimensional gray-scale images not only confirm the fast convergence of our algorithms, but also show a near-linear speedup on a parallel system with shared memory due to the lock-free implementation. Bin Gu 0001, Wenhan Xian, Heng Huang 0001 |
IJCAI | 2 |