Christian Alexander Steinparz

dblp:246/4050 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-6801-0438ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics
dimensionality reduction
0.712023
Visual Exploration of Relationships and Structure in Low-Dimensional Embeddings · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2023
Visualization and visual analytics
scatterplot
0.712023
Visual Exploration of Relationships and Structure in Low-Dimensional Embeddings · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2023
Visualization and visual analytics › dimensionality reduction
visualization embedding
0.712023
Visual Exploration of Relationships and Structure in Low-Dimensional Embeddings · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2023
Visualization and visual analytics › visual analytics
visual analytics workflow
0.212023
Visual Exploration of Relationships and Structure in Low-Dimensional Embeddings · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

summary visualization · 0.7difference visualization · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Visual Exploration of Relationships and Structure in Low-Dimensional Embeddings
abstract
In this work, we propose an interactive visual approach for the exploration and formation of structural relationships in embeddings of high-dimensional data. These structural relationships, such as item sequences, associations of items with groups, and hierarchies between groups of items, are defining properties of many real-world datasets. Nevertheless, most existing methods for the visual exploration of embeddings treat these structures as second-class citizens or do not take them into account at all. In our proposed analysis workflow, users explore enriched scatterplots of the embedding, in which relationships between items and/or groups are visually highlighted. The original high-dimensional data for single items, groups of items, or differences between connected items and groups are accessible through additional summary visualizations. We carefully tailored these summary and difference visualizations to the various data types and semantic contexts. During their exploratory analysis, users can externalize their insights by setting up additional groups and relationships between items and/or groups. We demonstrate the utility and potential impact of our approach by means of two use cases and multiple examples from various domains.
Klaus Eckelt, Andreas P. Hinterreiter, Patrick Adelberger, Conny Walchshofer, Vaishali Dhanoa, Christina Humer, Moritz Heckmann, Christian Alexander Steinparz, Marc Streit
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.8
2021 Projection Path Explorer: Exploring Visual Patterns in Projected Decision-making Paths
abstract
In problem-solving, a path towards a solutions can be viewed as a sequence of decisions. The decisions, made by humans or computers, describe a trajectory through a high-dimensional representation space of the problem. By means of dimensionality reduction, these trajectories can be visualized in lower-dimensional space. Such embedded trajectories have previously been applied to a wide variety of data, but analysis has focused almost exclusively on the self-similarity of single trajectories. In contrast, we describe patterns emerging from drawing many trajectories—for different initial conditions, end states, and solution strategies—in the same embedding space. We argue that general statements about the problem-solving tasks and solving strategies can be made by interpreting these patterns. We explore and characterize such patterns in trajectories resulting from human and machine-made decisions in a variety of application domains: logic puzzles (Rubik’s cube), strategy games (chess), and optimization problems (neural network training). We also discuss the importance of suitably chosen representation spaces and similarity metrics for the embedding.
Andreas P. Hinterreiter, Christian Alexander Steinparz, Moritz Schöfl, Holger Stitz, Marc Streit
ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst.2