Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gudmund Pammer
dblp:246/4277
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Learning theory · 53% Optimization for machine learning · 20% Generative modeling · 20% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
concentration of measure |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Tighter Learning Guarantees on Digital Computers via Concentration of Measure on Finite Spaces · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Tighter Learning Guarantees on Digital Computers via Concentration of Measure on Finite Spaces · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2026 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
energy-based model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Energy-Guided Continuous Entropic Barycenter Estimation for General Costs · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
optimal transport |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Energy-Guided Continuous Entropic Barycenter Estimation for General Costs · NeurIPS 2024 |
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Estimating Barycenters of Distributions with Neural Optimal Transport · ICML 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › optimal transport
wasserstein barycenter |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Estimating Barycenters of Distributions with Neural Optimal Transport · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Estimating Barycenters of Distributions with Neural Optimal Transport · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural optimal transport · 1.5dual formulation · 1.5adversarial learning · 1.5metric embedding · 1.0concentration of measure on finite metric spaces · 1.0weak optimal transport · 0.8dual reformulation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Tighter Learning Guarantees on Digital Computers via Concentration of Measure on Finite SpacesabstractMachine learning models with inputs in a Euclidean space Rd, when implemented on digital computers, generalize, and their generalization gap converges to 0 at a rate ofc/N1/2concerning the sample sizeN. However, the constantc> 0 obtained through classical methods can be large in terms of the ambient dimensiondand machine precision, posing a challenge whenNis small to realistically large. In this paper, we derive a family of generalization bounds {cm/N1/(2∨m)}∞m=1tailored for learning models on digital computers, which adapt to both the sample sizeNand the so-called geometric representation dimensionmof the discrete learning problem. Adjusting the parametermaccording toNresults in significantly tighter generalization bounds for practical sample sizesN, while settingmsmall maintains the optimal dimension-free worst-case rate ofO(1/N1/2). Notably,cm∈O(m1/2) for learning models on discretized Euclidean domains. Furthermore, our adaptive generalization bounds are formulated based on our new non-asymptotic result for concentration of measure in finite metric spaces, established via leveraging metric embedding arguments. Anastasis Kratsios, A. Martina Neuman, Gudmund Pammer |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 3 |
| 2024 | Estimating Barycenters of Distributions with Neural Optimal TransportabstractGiven a collection of probability measures, a practitioner sometimes needs to find an "average" distribution which adequately aggregates reference distributions. A theoretically appealing notion of such an average is the Wasserstein barycenter, which is the primal focus of our work. By building upon the dual formulation of Optimal Transport (OT), we propose a new scalable approach for solving the Wasserstein barycenter problem. Our methodology is based on the recent Neural OT solver: it has bi-level adversarial learning objective and works for general cost functions. These are key advantages of our method since the typical adversarial algorithms leveraging barycenter tasks utilize tri-level optimization and focus mostly on quadratic cost. We also establish theoretical error bounds for our proposed approach and showcase its applicability and effectiveness in illustrative scenarios and image data setups. Our source code is available at https://github.com/justkolesov/NOTBarycenters. Alexander Kolesov, Petr Mokrov, Igor Udovichenko, Milena Gazdieva, Gudmund Pammer, Evgeny Burnaev, Alexander Korotin |
ICML | 5 |
| 2024 | Energy-Guided Continuous Entropic Barycenter Estimation for General CostsabstractOptimal transport (OT) barycenters are a mathematically grounded way of averaging probability distributions while capturing their geometric properties. In short, the barycenter task is to take the average of a collection of probability distributions w.r.t. given OT discrepancies. We propose a novel algorithm for approximating the continuous Entropic OT (EOT) barycenter for arbitrary OT cost functions. Our approach is built upon the dual reformulation of the EOT problem based on weak OT, which has recently gained the attention of the ML community. Beyond its novelty, our method enjoys several advantageous properties: (i) we establish quality bounds for the recovered solution; (ii) this approach seamlessly interconnects with the Energy-Based Models (EBMs) learning procedure enabling the use of well-tuned algorithms for the problem of interest; (iii) it provides an intuitive optimization scheme avoiding min-max, reinforce and other intricate technical tricks. For validation, we consider several low-dimensional scenarios and image-space setups, including *non-Euclidean* cost functions. Furthermore, we investigate the practical task of learning the barycenter on an image manifold generated by a pretrained generative model, opening up new directions for real-world applications. Our code is available at https://github.com/justkolesov/EnergyGuidedBarycenters. Alexander Kolesov, Petr Mokrov, Igor Udovichenko, Milena Gazdieva, Gudmund Pammer, Anastasis Kratsios, Evgeny Burnaev, Alexander Korotin |
NeurIPS | 5 |