Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Christina Dan Wang
dblp:246/4851
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 40% Reinforcement learning · 35% Learning theory · 24% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 87% Information theory · 13% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational finance and economics · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models › conditional independence
conditional independence testing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | K-Nearest-Neighbor Local Sampling Based Conditional Independence Testing · NeurIPS 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
conditional independence testing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Nearest-Neighbor Sampling Based Conditional Independence Testing · AAAI 2023 |
Mathematical optimization
statistical estimation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Nearest-Neighbor Sampling Based Conditional Independence Testing · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning environment
benchmark environments |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | FinRL-Meta: Market Environments and Benchmarks for Data-Driven Financial Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
nonparametric estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | K-Nearest-Neighbor Local Sampling Based Conditional Independence Testing · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › hypothesis testing
type-i error control |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | K-Nearest-Neighbor Local Sampling Based Conditional Independence Testing · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
deep reinforcement learning · 1.1dataops · 1.1nearest-neighbor sampling · 0.7k-nearest neighbors · 0.7conditional mutual information · 0.7classifier-based estimation · 0.7classifier-based conditional mutual information estimation · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Dynamic datasets and market environments for financial reinforcement learning
Xiao-Yang Liu, Ziyi Xia, Hongyang Yang, Jiechao Gao, Daochen Zha, Ming Zhu 0002, Christina Dan Wang, Zhaoran Wang 0001 |
Mach. Learn. | 7 |
| 2023 | Nearest-Neighbor Sampling Based Conditional Independence TestingabstractThe conditional randomization test (CRT) was recently proposed to test whether two random variables X and Y are conditionally independent given random variables Z. The CRT assumes that the conditional distribution of X given Z is known under the null hypothesis and then it is compared to the distribution of the observed samples of the original data. The aim of this paper is to develop a novel alternative of CRT by using nearest-neighbor sampling without assuming the exact form of the distribution of X given Z. Specifically, we utilize the computationally efficient 1-nearest-neighbor to approximate the conditional distribution that encodes the null hypothesis. Then, theoretically, we show that the distribution of the generated samples is very close to the true conditional distribution in terms of total variation distance. Furthermore, we take the classifier-based conditional mutual information estimator as our test statistic. The test statistic as an empirical fundamental information theoretic quantity is able to well capture the conditional-dependence feature. We show that our proposed test is computationally very fast, while controlling type I and II errors quite well. Finally, we demonstrate the efficiency of our proposed test in both synthetic and real data analyses. Shuai Li 0020, Ziqi Chen 0002, Hongtu Zhu, Christina Dan Wang, Wang Wen |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2023 | K-Nearest-Neighbor Local Sampling Based Conditional Independence TestingabstractConditional independence (CI) testing is a fundamental task in statistics and machine learning, but its effectiveness is hindered by the challenges posed by high-dimensional conditioning variables and limited data samples. This article introduces a novel testing approach to address these challenges and enhance control of the type I error while achieving high power under alternative hypotheses. The proposed approach incorporates a computationally efficient classifier-based conditional mutual information (CMI) estimator, capable of capturing intricate dependence structures among variables. To approximate a distribution encoding the null hypothesis, a $k$-nearest-neighbor local sampling strategy is employed. An important advantage of this approach is its ability to operate without assumptions about distribution forms or feature dependencies. Furthermore, it eliminates the need to derive asymptotic null distributions for the estimated CMI and avoids dataset splitting, making it particularly suitable for small datasets. The method presented in this article demonstrates asymptotic control of the type I error and consistency against all alternative hypotheses. Extensive analyses using both synthetic and real data highlight the computational efficiency of the proposed test. Moreover, it outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods in terms of type I and II errors, even in scenarios with high-dimensional conditioning sets. Additionally, the proposed approach exhibits robustness in the presence of heavy-tailed data. Shuai Li 0020, Yingjie Zhang 0004, Hongtu Zhu, Christina Dan Wang, Hai Shu, Ziqi Chen 0002 |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2022 | FinRL-Meta: Market Environments and Benchmarks for Data-Driven Financial Reinforcement LearningabstractFinance is a particularly challenging playground for deep reinforcement learning. However, establishing high-quality market environments and benchmarks for financial reinforcement learning is challenging due to three major factors, namely, low signal-to-noise ratio of financial data, survivorship bias of historical data, and backtesting overfitting. In this paper, we present an openly accessible FinRL-Meta library that has been actively maintained by the AI4Finance community. First, following a DataOps paradigm, we will provide hundreds of market environments through an automatic data curation pipeline that processes dynamic datasets from real-world markets into gym-style market environments. Second, we reproduce popular papers as stepping stones for users to design new trading strategies. We also deploy the library on cloud platforms so that users can visualize their own results and assess the relative performance via community-wise competitions. Third, FinRL-Meta provides tens of Jupyter/Python demos organized into a curriculum and a documentation website to serve the rapidly growing community. FinRL-Meta is available at: \url{https://github.com/AI4Finance-Foundation/FinRL-Meta} Xiao-Yang Liu, Ziyi Xia, Jingyang Rui, Jiechao Gao, Hongyang Yang, Ming Zhu 0002, Christina Dan Wang, Zhaoran Wang 0001 |
NeurIPS | 7 |