Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ria Ghosh

dblp:246/5229 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-9107-1781ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Audio and music processing › hearing aids
cochlear implant processing
0.712023
Bilateral Cochlear Implant Processing of Coding Strategies With CCi-MOBILE, an Open-Source Research Platform · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2023
Audio and music processing
sound source localization
0.212023
Bilateral Cochlear Implant Processing of Coding Strategies With CCi-MOBILE, an Open-Source Research Platform · IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

real-time processing · 0.7bilateral algorithm synchronization · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Bilateral Cochlear Implant Processing of Coding Strategies With CCi-MOBILE, an Open-Source Research Platform
abstract
While speech understanding for cochlear implant (CI) users in quiet is relatively effective, listeners experience difficulty in identification of speaker and sound location. To assist for better residual hearing abilities and speech intelligibility support, bilateral and bimodal forms of assisted hearing is becoming popular among CI users. Effective bilateral processing calls for testing precise algorithm synchronization and fitting between both left and right ear channels in order to capture interaural time and level difference cues (ITD and ILDs). This work demonstrates bilateral implant algorithm processing using a custom-made CI research platform - CCi-MOBILE, which is capable of capturing precise source localization information and supports researchers in testing bilateral CI processing in real-time naturalistic environments. Simulation-based, objective, and subjective testing has been performed to validate the accuracy of the platform. The subjective test results produced an RMS error of ±8.66° for source localization, which is comparable to the performance of commercial CI processors.
Ria Ghosh, John H. L. Hansen
IEEE ACM Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process.1
2019 Quantifying Cochlear Implant Users' Ability for Speaker Identification Using CI Auditory Stimuli
abstract
Speaker recognition is a biometric modality that uses underlying speech information to determine the identity of the speaker. Speaker Identification (SID) under noisy conditions is one of the challenging topics in the field of speech processing, specifically when it comes to individuals with cochlear implants (CI). This study analyzes and quantifies the ability of CI-users to perform speaker identification based on direct electric auditory stimuli. CI users employ a limited number of frequency bands (8 ∼ 22) and use electrodes to directly stimulate the Basilar Membrane/Cochlear in order to recognize the speech signal. The sparsity of electric stimulation within the CI frequency range is a prime reason for loss in human speech recognition, as well as SID performance. Therefore, it is assumed that CI-users might be unable to recognize and distinguish a speaker given dependent information such as formant frequencies, pitch etc. which are lost to un-simulated electrodes. To quantify this assumption, the input speech signal is processed using a CI Advanced Combined Encoder (ACE) signal processing strategy to construct the CI auditory electrodogram. The proposed study uses 50 speakers from each of three different databases for training the system using two different classifiers under quiet, and tested under both quiet and noisy conditions. The objective result shows that, the CI users can effectively identify a limited number of speakers. However, their performance decreases when more speakers are added in the system, as well as when noisy conditions are introduced. This information could therefore be used for improving CI-user signal processing techniques to improve human SID.
Nursadul Mamun, Ria Ghosh, John H. L. Hansen
INTERSPEECH2