EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Glenna Manns
dblp:246/5346
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 91% Cloud and datacenter computing · 9% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A statistics-based performance testing methodology for cloud applications · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2019 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › statistical analysis
statistical performance analysis |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | A statistics-based performance testing methodology for cloud applications · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
nonparametric statistics · 0.4likelihood theory · 0.4bootstrap method · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | A statistics-based performance testing methodology for cloud applicationsabstractThe low cost of resource ownership and flexibility have led users to increasingly port their applications to the clouds. To fully realize the cost benefits of cloud services, users usually need to reliably know the execution performance of their applications. However, due to the random performance fluctuations experienced by cloud applications, the black box nature of public clouds and the cloud usage costs, testing on clouds to acquire accurate performance results is extremely difficult. In this paper, we present a novel cloud performance testing methodology called PT4Cloud. By employing non-parametric statistical approaches of likelihood theory and the bootstrap method, PT4Cloud provides reliable stop conditions to obtain highly accurate performance distributions with confidence bands. These statistical approaches also allow users to specify intuitive accuracy goals and easily trade between accuracy and testing cost. We evaluated PT4Cloud with 33 benchmark configurations on Amazon Web Service and Chameleon clouds. When compared with performance data obtained from extensive performance tests, PT4Cloud provides testing results with 95.4% accuracy on average while reducing the number of test runs by 62%. We also propose two test execution reduction techniques for PT4Cloud, which can reduce the number of test runs by 90.1% while retaining an average accuracy of 91%. We compared our technique to three other techniques and found that our results are much more accurate. Sen He 0002, Glenna Manns, John Saunders, Wei Wang 0054, Lori L. Pollock, Mary Lou Soffa |
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE | 2 |