Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yasasa Abeysirigoonawardena

dblp:246/7652 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Autonomous driving · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Autonomous driving › safety-critical scenario generation
adversarial scenario generation
0.412019
Generating Adversarial Driving Scenarios in High-Fidelity Simulators · ICRA 2019
Robotics › Autonomous driving › autonomous vehicle testing
simulation-based testing
0.412019
Generating Adversarial Driving Scenarios in High-Fidelity Simulators · ICRA 2019
Robotics › Autonomous driving › scenario generation
traffic scenario generation
0.412019
Generating Adversarial Driving Scenarios in High-Fidelity Simulators · ICRA 2019
Robotics › Autonomous driving › driving policy learning
imitation learning for driving
0.112019
Generating Adversarial Driving Scenarios in High-Fidelity Simulators · ICRA 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vision-based imitation learning · 0.4bayesian optimization · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Generating Adversarial Driving Scenarios in High-Fidelity Simulators
abstract
In recent years self-driving vehicles have become more commonplace on public roads, with the promise of bringing safety and efficiency to modern transportation systems. Increasing the reliability of these vehicles on the road requires an extensive suite of software tests, ideally performed on high-fidelity simulators, where multiple vehicles and pedestrians interact with the self-driving vehicle. It is therefore of critical importance to ensure that self-driving software is assessed against a wide range of challenging simulated driving scenarios. The state of the art in driving scenario generation, as adopted by some of the front-runners of the self-driving car industry, still relies on human input [1]. In this paper we propose to automate the process using Bayesian optimization to generate adversarial self-driving scenarios that expose poorly-engineered or poorly-trained self-driving policies, and increase the risk of collision with simulated pedestrians and vehicles. We show that by incorporating the generated scenarios into the training set of the self-driving policy, and by fine-tuning the policy using vision-based imitation learning we obtain safer self-driving behavior.
Yasasa Abeysirigoonawardena, Florian Shkurti, Gregory Dudek
ICRA1