Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matthew Thomas Watson
dblp:246/7672
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-8443-4372ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 50% Legged, aerial and field robots · 25% Robot navigation and mapping · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › nonlinear control
feedback linearization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Collinear Mecanum Drive: Modeling, Analysis, Partial Feedback Linearization, and Nonlinear Control · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2021 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
nonlinear control |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Collinear Mecanum Drive: Modeling, Analysis, Partial Feedback Linearization, and Nonlinear Control · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2021 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
omnidirectional vehicle |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Collinear Mecanum Drive: Modeling, Analysis, Partial Feedback Linearization, and Nonlinear Control · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2021 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
robot locomotion |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Collinear Mecanum Drive: Modeling, Analysis, Partial Feedback Linearization, and Nonlinear Control · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
partial feedback linearization · 0.5lyapunov stability · 0.5backstepping control · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Collinear Mecanum Drive: Modeling, Analysis, Partial Feedback Linearization, and Nonlinear ControlabstractThe collinear Mecanum drive (CMD) is a novel robot locomotion system, capable of generating omnidirectional motion while simultaneously dynamically balancing, achieved using a collinear arrangement of three or more Mecanum wheels. The CMD has a significantly thinner ground footprint than existing omnidirectional locomotion methods, which does not need to be enlarged with increasing robot height as to avoid toppling during acceleration or external disturbance. This combination of omnidirectional manoeuvrability and a thin ground footprint allows for the creation of tall robots that are able to navigate through much narrower gaps between obstacles than existing omnidirectional locomotion methods. This allows for greater manoeuvrability in confined and cluttered environments, such as that encountered in the personal service and automated warehousing robotics sectors. This article derives the kinematics and dynamics models of the CMD, analyzes controllability and accessibility, and determines the degree to which a CMD can be linearized by feedback. A partial feedback linearization is then performed, and three practically useful nonlinear controllers are derived using a backstepping design approach, all with convergence and stability guarantees for the fully coupled nonlinear model. These are demonstrated both in simulation and on a real-world CMD experimental prototype. Matthew Thomas Watson, Dan Gladwin, Tony J. Prescott |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 1 |
| 2019 | Velocity Constrained Trajectory Generation for a Collinear Mecanum Wheeled RobotabstractWhile much research has been conducted into the generation of smooth trajectories for underactuated unstable aerial vehicles such as quadrotors, less attention has been paid to the application of the same techniques to ground based omnidirectional dynamically balancing robots. These systems have more control authority over their linear accelerations than aerial vehicles, meaning trajectory smoothness is less of a critical design parameter. However, when operating in indoor environments these systems must often adhere to relatively low velocity constraints, resulting in very conservative trajectories when enforced using existing trajectory optimisation methods. This paper makes two contributions; this gap is bridged by the extension of these existing methods to create a fast velocity constrained trajectory planner, with trajectory timing characteristics derived from the optimal minimum-time solution of a simplified acceleration and velocity constrained model. Next, a differentially flat model of an omnidirectional balancing robot utilizing a collinear Mecanum drive is derived, which is used to allow an experimental prototype of this configuration to smoothly follow these velocity constrained trajectories. Matthew Thomas Watson, Dan Gladwin, Tony J. Prescott, Sebastian Conran |
ICRA | 1 |