Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mohamed Baioumy
dblp:246/7673
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-7198-5818ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 36% Motion planning and robot control · 24% Robot manipulation · 18% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration › exploration strategies
boltzmann exploration |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Monte Carlo Tree Search with Boltzmann Exploration · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Monte Carlo Tree Search with Boltzmann Exploration · NeurIPS 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › game tree search
monte carlo tree search |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Monte Carlo Tree Search with Boltzmann Exploration · NeurIPS 2023 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
manipulator control |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Active Inference for Integrated State-Estimation, Control, and Learning · ICRA 2021 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Active Inference for Integrated State-Estimation, Control, and Learning · ICRA 2021 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation
grasping |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Design and Evaluation of an Energy-Saving Drive for a Versatile Robotic Gripper · ICRA 2019 |
Robotics › Robot manipulation › grasping
robotic gripper |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Design and Evaluation of an Energy-Saving Drive for a Versatile Robotic Gripper · ICRA 2019 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
maximum entropy reinforcement learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Monte Carlo Tree Search with Boltzmann Exploration · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
parameter estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Active Inference for Integrated State-Estimation, Control, and Learning · ICRA 2021 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
state estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Active Inference for Integrated State-Estimation, Control, and Learning · ICRA 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
boltzmann policy · 0.7alias method · 0.7variational free energy minimization · 0.5active inference · 0.5reliability-based design optimization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Monte Carlo Tree Search with Boltzmann ExplorationabstractMonte-Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) methods, such as Upper Confidence Bound applied to Trees (UCT), are instrumental to automated planning techniques. However, UCT can be slow to explore an optimal action when it initially appears inferior to other actions. Maximum ENtropy Tree-Search (MENTS) incorporates the maximum entropy principle into an MCTS approach, utilising Boltzmann policies to sample actions, naturally encouraging more exploration. In this paper, we highlight a major limitation of MENTS: optimal actions for the maximum entropy objective do not necessarily correspond to optimal actions for the original objective. We introduce two algorithms, Boltzmann Tree Search (BTS) and Decaying ENtropy Tree-Search (DENTS), that address these limitations and preserve the benefits of Boltzmann policies, such as allowing actions to be sampled faster by using the Alias method. Our empirical analysis shows that our algorithms show consistent high performance across several benchmark domains, including the game of Go. Michael Painter, Mohamed Baioumy, Nick Hawes, Bruno Lacerda |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2022 | Unbiased Active Inference for Classical ControlabstractActive inference is a mathematical framework that originated in computational neuroscience. Recently, it has been demonstrated as a promising approach for constructing goal-driven behavior in robotics. Specifically, the active inference controller (AIC) has been successful on several continuous control and state-estimation tasks. Despite its relative success, some established design choices lead to a number of practical limitations for robot control. These include having a biased estimate of the state, and only an implicit model of control actions. In this paper, we highlight these limitations and propose an extended version of the unbiased active inference controller (u-AIC). The u-AIC maintains all the compelling benefits of the AIC and removes its limitations. Simulation results on a 2-DOF arm and experiments on a real 7-DOF manipulator show the improved performance of the u-AIC with respect to the standard AIC. The code can be found at https://github.com/cpezzato/unbiasedaic. Mohamed Baioumy, Corrado Pezzato, Riccardo M. G. Ferrari, Nick Hawes |
IROS | 1 |
| 2021 | Active Inference for Integrated State-Estimation, Control, and LearningabstractThis work presents an approach for control, state-estimation and learning model (hyper)parameters for robotic manipulators. It is based on the active inference framework, prominent in computational neuroscience as a theory of the brain, where behaviour arises from minimizing variational free-energy. First, we show there is a direct relationship between active inference controllers, and classic methods such as PID control. We demonstrate its application for adaptive and robust behaviour of a robotic manipulator that rivals state-of-the-art. Additionally, we show that by learning specific hyperparameters, our approach can deal with unmodeled dynamics, damps oscillations, and is robust against poor initial parameters. The approach is validated on the ‘Franka Emika Panda’ 7 DoF manipulator. Finally, we highlight limitations of active inference controllers for robotic systems. Mohamed Baioumy, Paul Duckworth, Bruno Lacerda, Nick Hawes |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2019 | Design and Evaluation of an Energy-Saving Drive for a Versatile Robotic GripperabstractThe main task of robotic grippers, holding an object, does not require work theoretically. Yet grippers consume significant amounts of energy in practice. This paper presents an approach for designing an energy-saving drive for robotic grippers employing a Statically Balanced Force Amplifier (SBFA) and a Non-backdrivable mechanism (NBDM). A novel metric (Grip Performance Metric) to systematically evaluate drives regarding their energy consumption, is used in the design phase; afterwards, the realization and testing of a prototype (REED, Robotic Energy-Efficient Drive) are presented. Results show that the actuation force can be reduced by 92%, resulting in energy-savings of 86% for an example task. This shows the potential of drives based on SBFAs and NBDMs to achieve energy-neutral grippers. Job Neven, Mohamed Baioumy, Wouter Wolfslag, Martijn Wisse |
ICRA | 2 |