Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shihong Fang
dblp:246/7842
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Autonomous driving · 30% Efficient and distributed learning · 26% Trustworthy machine learning · 19% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › adaptive computation
conditional computation |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Multi-modal Experts Network for Autonomous Driving · ICRA 2020 Reconfigurable Network for Efficient Inferencing in Autonomous Vehicles · ICRA 2019 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Multi-modal Experts Network for Autonomous Driving · ICRA 2020 Reconfigurable Network for Efficient Inferencing in Autonomous Vehicles · ICRA 2019 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › perception › environment perception
perception for self-driving vehicles |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Multi-modal Experts Network for Autonomous Driving · ICRA 2020 Reconfigurable Network for Efficient Inferencing in Autonomous Vehicles · ICRA 2019 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | ERASE-Net: Efficient Segmentation Networks for Automotive Radar Signals · ICRA 2023 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation › non-RGB semantic segmentation
radar semantic segmentation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | ERASE-Net: Efficient Segmentation Networks for Automotive Radar Signals · ICRA 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Backdoor Attacks on the DNN Interpretation System · AAAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › visual explanation
saliency map |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Backdoor Attacks on the DNN Interpretation System · AAAI 2022 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
attack on interpretations |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Backdoor Attacks on the DNN Interpretation System · AAAI 2022 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
backdoor attack |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Backdoor Attacks on the DNN Interpretation System · AAAI 2022 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › sensor fusion
multimodal sensor fusion |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Multi-modal Experts Network for Autonomous Driving · ICRA 2020 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving › perception
multi-sensor perception |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Reconfigurable Network for Efficient Inferencing in Autonomous Vehicles · ICRA 2019 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d object detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | ERASE-Net: Efficient Segmentation Networks for Automotive Radar Signals · ICRA 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural network training
end-to-end learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Multi-modal Experts Network for Autonomous Driving · ICRA 2020 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
unmanned ground vehicle |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Reconfigurable Network for Efficient Inferencing in Autonomous Vehicles · ICRA 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
penalty term optimization · 1.1adversarial training · 1.1mixture of experts · 0.8network compression · 0.7detect-then-segment · 0.7deep learning · 0.7multi-stage training · 0.4gating mechanism · 0.4gating network · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | ERASE-Net: Efficient Segmentation Networks for Automotive Radar SignalsabstractAmong various sensors for assisted and autonomous driving systems, automotive radar has been considered as a robust and low-cost solution even in adverse weather or lighting conditions. With the recent development of radar technologies and open-sourced annotated data sets, semantic segmentation with radar signals has become very promising. However, existing methods are either computationally expensive or discard significant amounts of valuable information from raw 3D radar signals by reducing them to 2D planes via averaging. In this work, we introduce ERASE-Net, an Efficient RAdar SEgmentation Network to segment the raw radar signals semantically. The core of our approach is the novel detect-then-segment method for raw radar signals. It first detects the center point of each object, then extracts a compact radar signal representation, and finally performs semantic segmentation. We show that our method can achieve superior performance on radar semantic segmentation task compared to the state-of-the-art (SOTA) technique. Furthermore, our approach requires up to 20×less computational resources. Finally, we show that the proposed ERASE-Net can be compressed by 40% without significant loss in performance, significantly more than the SOTA network, which makes it a more promising candidate for practical automotive applications. Shihong Fang, Devansh Bisla, Anna Choromanska, Satish Ravindran, Dongyin Ren, Ryan Wu |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2022 | Backdoor Attacks on the DNN Interpretation SystemabstractInterpretability is crucial to understand the inner workings of deep neural networks (DNNs). Many interpretation methods help to understand the decision-making of DNNs by generating saliency maps that highlight parts of the input image that contribute the most to the prediction made by the DNN. In this paper we design a backdoor attack that alters the saliency map produced by the network for an input image with a specific trigger pattern while not losing the prediction performance significantly. The saliency maps are incorporated in the penalty term of the objective function that is used to train a deep model and its influence on model training is conditioned upon the presence of a trigger. We design two types of attacks: a targeted attack that enforces a specific modification of the saliency map and a non-targeted attack when the importance scores of the top pixels from the original saliency map are significantly reduced. We perform empirical evaluations of the proposed backdoor attacks on gradient-based interpretation methods, Grad-CAM and SimpleGrad, and a gradient-free scheme, VisualBackProp, for a variety of deep learning architectures. We show that our attacks constitute a serious security threat to the reliability of the interpretation methods when deploying models developed by untrusted sources. We furthermore show that existing backdoor defense mechanisms are ineffective in detecting our attacks. Finally, we demonstrate that the proposed methodology can be used in an inverted setting, where the correct saliency map can be obtained only in the presence of a trigger (key), effectively making the interpretation system available only to selected users. Shihong Fang, Anna Choromanska |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2020 | Multi-modal Experts Network for Autonomous DrivingabstractEnd-to-end learning from sensory data has shown promising results in autonomous driving. While employing many sensors enhances world perception and should lead to more robust and reliable behavior of autonomous vehicles, it is challenging to train and deploy such network and at least two problems are encountered in the considered setting. The first one is the increase of computational complexity with the number of sensing devices. The other is the phenomena of network overfitting to the simplest and most informative input. We address both challenges with a novel, carefully tailored multi-modal experts network architecture and propose a multi-stage training procedure. The network contains a gating mechanism, which selects the most relevant input at each inference time step using a mixed discrete-continuous policy. We demonstrate the plausibility of the proposed approach on our 1/6 scale truck equipped with three cameras and one LiDAR. Shihong Fang, Anna Choromanska |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2019 | Reconfigurable Network for Efficient Inferencing in Autonomous VehiclesabstractWe propose a reconfigurable network for efficient inference dedicated to autonomous platforms equipped with multiple perception sensors. The size of the network for steering autonomous platforms grows proportionally to the number of installed sensors eventually preventing the usage of multiple sensors in real-time applications due to an inefficient inference. Our approach hinges on the observation that multiple sensors provide a large stream of data, where only a fraction of the data is relevant for the performed task at any given moment in time. The architecture of the reconfigurable network that we propose contains separate feature extractors, called experts, for each sensor. The decisive block of our model is the gating network, which online decides which sensor provides the data that is most relevant for driving. It then reconfigures the network by activating only the relevant expert corresponding to that sensor and deactivating the remaining ones. As a consequence, the model never extracts features from data that are irrelevant for driving. The gating network takes the data from all inputs and thus to avoid explosion of computation time and memory space it has to be realized as a small and shallow network. We verify our model on the unmanned ground vehicle (UGV) comprising of the 1/6 scale remote control truck equipped with three cameras. We demonstrate that the reconfigurable network correctly chooses experts in real-time allowing the reduction of computations cost for the whole model without deteriorating its performance. Shihong Fang, Anna Choromanska |
ICRA | 1 |