Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kyle Levin

dblp:246/7867 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 87% Legged, aerial and field robots · 13%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational science and engineering · 100%
Computer networks
1 paper
Wireless networking · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program synthesis and code generation › neural program synthesis
LLM-based program synthesis
0.912025
Discovering Symbolic Cognitive Models from Human and Animal Behavior · ICML 2025
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › multi-robot motion planning
multi-vehicle motion planning
0.412019
Decentralized Formation Coordination of Multiple Quadcopters under Communication Constraints · ICRA 2019
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization
0.412019
Decentralized Formation Coordination of Multiple Quadcopters under Communication Constraints · ICRA 2019
Computational science and engineering › computational cognitive science
cognitive modeling
0.312025
Discovering Symbolic Cognitive Models from Human and Animal Behavior · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 1.7evolutionary algorithm · 1.7receding horizon control · 0.8outer approximation · 0.8branch-and-bound · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Discovering Symbolic Cognitive Models from Human and Animal Behavior
abstract
Symbolic models play a key role in cognitive science, expressing computationally precise hypotheses about how the brain implements a cognitive process. Identifying an appropriate model typically requires a great deal of effort and ingenuity on the part of a human scientist. Here, we adapt FunSearch (Romera-Paredes et al. 2024), a recently developed tool that uses Large Language Models (LLMs) in an evolutionary algorithm, to automatically discover symbolic cognitive models that accurately capture human and animal behavior. We consider datasets from three species performing a classic reward-learning task that has been the focus of substantial modeling effort, and find that the discovered programs outperform state-of-the-art cognitive models for each. The discovered programs can readily be interpreted as hypotheses about human and animal cognition, instantiating interpretable symbolic learning and decision-making algorithms. Broadly, these results demonstrate the viability of using LLM-powered program synthesis to propose novel scientific hypotheses regarding mechanisms of human and animal cognition.
Pablo Samuel Castro, Nenad Tomasev, Ankit Anand, Navodita Sharma, Rishika Mohanta, Aparna Dev, Kuba Perlin, Siddhant Jain, Kyle Levin, Noémi Élteto, Will Dabney, Alexander Novikov 0001, Glenn C. Turner, Maria K. Eckstein, Nathaniel D. Daw, Kevin J. Miller, Kimberly L. Stachenfeld
ICML9
2019 Decentralized Formation Coordination of Multiple Quadcopters under Communication Constraints
abstract
This paper addresses the problem of decentralized, outdoor formation coordination with multiple quadcopters. The problem is formulated as a receding horizon, mixed-integer non-linear program (RH-MINLP). Each quadcopter solves this RH-MINLP to generate its time-optimal speed profile along a minimum snap spline path while coordinating its position in a desired formation with other quadcopters. Constraints on quadcopter kinematics, dynamics, collision avoidance, wireless communication connectivity, and geometric formations are modeled. Communication connectivity is modeled as a constraint on maximum separation distance based on a minimum viable received signal strength in the presence of path loss attenuation. The resulting RH-MINLP is non-convex, and is solved using an outer-approximation branch and bound solver with a warm-starting scheme. The framework is validated via Hardware-in-the-Loop (HITL) and outdoor flight test with up to 6 quadcopters. Results demonstrate the effect of number of quadcopters and formation type on total transit time. Average radio packet loss statistics during transit indicate robust network performance for a round robin communication scheduling scheme.
Pramod Abichandani, Kyle Levin, Donald J. Bucci
ICRA2