Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kyle Levin
dblp:246/7867
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Motion planning and robot control · 87% Legged, aerial and field robots · 13% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Wireless networking · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Program synthesis and code generation › neural program synthesis
LLM-based program synthesis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Discovering Symbolic Cognitive Models from Human and Animal Behavior · ICML 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › multi-robot motion planning
multi-vehicle motion planning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Decentralized Formation Coordination of Multiple Quadcopters under Communication Constraints · ICRA 2019 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Decentralized Formation Coordination of Multiple Quadcopters under Communication Constraints · ICRA 2019 |
Computational science and engineering › computational cognitive science
cognitive modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Discovering Symbolic Cognitive Models from Human and Animal Behavior · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 1.7evolutionary algorithm · 1.7receding horizon control · 0.8outer approximation · 0.8branch-and-bound · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Discovering Symbolic Cognitive Models from Human and Animal BehaviorabstractSymbolic models play a key role in cognitive science, expressing computationally precise hypotheses about how the brain implements a cognitive process. Identifying an appropriate model typically requires a great deal of effort and ingenuity on the part of a human scientist.
Here, we adapt FunSearch (Romera-Paredes et al. 2024), a recently developed tool that uses Large Language Models (LLMs) in an evolutionary algorithm, to automatically discover symbolic cognitive models that accurately capture human and animal behavior.
We consider datasets from three species performing a classic reward-learning task that has been the focus of substantial modeling effort, and find that the discovered programs outperform state-of-the-art cognitive models for each.
The discovered programs can readily be interpreted as hypotheses about human and animal cognition, instantiating interpretable symbolic learning and decision-making algorithms. Broadly, these results demonstrate the viability of using LLM-powered program synthesis to propose novel scientific hypotheses regarding mechanisms of human and animal cognition. Pablo Samuel Castro, Nenad Tomasev, Ankit Anand, Navodita Sharma, Rishika Mohanta, Aparna Dev, Kuba Perlin, Siddhant Jain, Kyle Levin, Noémi Élteto, Will Dabney, Alexander Novikov 0001, Glenn C. Turner, Maria K. Eckstein, Nathaniel D. Daw, Kevin J. Miller, Kimberly L. Stachenfeld |
ICML | 9 |
| 2019 | Decentralized Formation Coordination of Multiple Quadcopters under Communication ConstraintsabstractThis paper addresses the problem of decentralized, outdoor formation coordination with multiple quadcopters. The problem is formulated as a receding horizon, mixed-integer non-linear program (RH-MINLP). Each quadcopter solves this RH-MINLP to generate its time-optimal speed profile along a minimum snap spline path while coordinating its position in a desired formation with other quadcopters. Constraints on quadcopter kinematics, dynamics, collision avoidance, wireless communication connectivity, and geometric formations are modeled. Communication connectivity is modeled as a constraint on maximum separation distance based on a minimum viable received signal strength in the presence of path loss attenuation. The resulting RH-MINLP is non-convex, and is solved using an outer-approximation branch and bound solver with a warm-starting scheme. The framework is validated via Hardware-in-the-Loop (HITL) and outdoor flight test with up to 6 quadcopters. Results demonstrate the effect of number of quadcopters and formation type on total transit time. Average radio packet loss statistics during transit indicate robust network performance for a round robin communication scheduling scheme. Pramod Abichandani, Kyle Levin, Donald J. Bucci |
ICRA | 2 |