Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Paul-Andre C. Bissonnette

dblp:246/9219 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
2 papers
Internet architecture and protocols · 53% Network management and operations · 47%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Cloud and datacenter computing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network management and operations
network verification
0.412019
Validating datacenters at scale · SIGCOMM 2019
Internet architecture and protocols
wide area network
0.212023
OneWAN is better than two: Unifying a split WAN architecture · NSDI 2023
Cloud and datacenter computing › datacenter network
datacenter network operations
0.112019
Validating datacenters at scale · SIGCOMM 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

formal methods · 0.8automated theorem proving · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 OneWAN is better than two: Unifying a split WAN architecture
Umesh Krishnaswamy, Rachee Singh, Paul Mattes, Paul-Andre C. Bissonnette, Nikolaj S. Bjørner, Zahira Nasrin, Sonal Kothari, Prabhakar Reddy, John Abeln, Srikanth Kandula, Himanshu Raj, Luis Irún-Briz, Jamie Gaudette, Erica Lan
NSDI4
2019 Validating datacenters at scale
abstract
We describe our experiences using formal methods and automated theorem proving for network operation at scale. The experiences are based on developing and applying the SecGuru and RCDC (Reality Checker for Data Centers) tools in Azure. SecGuru has been used since 2013 and thus, is arguably a pioneering industrial deployment of network verification. SecGuru is used for validating ACLs and more recently RCDC checks forwarding tables at Azure scale. A central technical angle is that we use local contracts and local checks, that can be performed at scale in parallel, and without maintaining global snapshots, to validate global properties of datacenter networks. Specifications leverage declarative encodings of configurations and automated theorem proving for validation. We describe how intent is automatically derived from network architectures and verification is incorporated as prechecks for making changes, live monitoring, and for evolving legacy policies. We document how network verification, grounded in architectural constraints, can be integral to operating a reliable cloud at scale.
Karthick Jayaraman, Nikolaj S. Bjørner, Jitendra Padhye, Amar Agrawal, Ashish Bhargava, Paul-Andre C. Bissonnette, Shane Foster, Andrew Helwer, Mark Kasten, Anup Namdhari, Haseeb Niaz, Aniruddha Parkhi, Hanukumar Pinnamraju, Adrian Power, Neha Milind Raje, Parag Sharma
SIGCOMM6