Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nuri Mert Vural
dblp:247/1446
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-2820-2806ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Learning theory · 47% Deep learning architectures and training · 41% Efficient and distributed learning · 12% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
sample complexity |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Learning quadratic neural networks in high dimensions: SGD dynamics and scaling laws · NeurIPS 2025 Pruning is Optimal for Learning Sparse Features in High-Dimensions · COLT 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning quadratic neural networks in high dimensions: SGD dynamics and scaling laws · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training optimization
stochastic gradient descent dynamics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning quadratic neural networks in high dimensions: SGD dynamics and scaling laws · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Learning quadratic neural networks in high dimensions: SGD dynamics and scaling laws · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
pruning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Pruning is Optimal for Learning Sparse Features in High-Dimensions · COLT 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical query learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Pruning is Optimal for Learning Sparse Features in High-Dimensions · COLT 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
first-order methods |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Mirror Descent Strikes Again: Optimal Stochastic Convex Optimization under Infinite Noise Variance · COLT 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods
mirror descent |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Mirror Descent Strikes Again: Optimal Stochastic Convex Optimization under Infinite Noise Variance · COLT 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
stochastic convex optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Mirror Descent Strikes Again: Optimal Stochastic Convex Optimization under Infinite Noise Variance · COLT 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
stochastic optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Mirror Descent Strikes Again: Optimal Stochastic Convex Optimization under Infinite Noise Variance · COLT 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mirror descent · 1.1riccati differential equation · 0.9hermite polynomial · 0.9gradient descent · 0.8correlational statistical query lower bounds · 0.8information-theoretic lower bounds · 0.6information-theoretic lower bound · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Learning quadratic neural networks in high dimensions: SGD dynamics and scaling lawsabstractWe study the optimization and sample complexity of gradient-based training of a two-layer neural network with quadratic activation function in the high-dimensional regime, where the data is generated as $f_*(\boldsymbol{x}) \propto \sum_{j=1}^{r}\lambda_j \sigma\left(\langle \boldsymbol{\theta_j}, \boldsymbol{x}\rangle\right), \boldsymbol{x} \sim \mathcal{N}(0,\boldsymbol{I}_d)$, $\sigma$ is the 2nd Hermite polynomial, and $\lbrace \boldsymbol{\theta}_j \rbrace _{j=1}^{r} \subset \mathbb{R}^d$ are orthonormal signal directions. We consider the extensive-width regime $r \asymp d^\beta$ for $\beta \in [0, 1)$, and assume a power-law decay on the (non-negative) second-layer coefficients $\lambda_j\asymp j^{-\alpha}$ for $\alpha \geq 0$.
We present a sharp analysis of the SGD dynamics in the feature learning regime, for both the population limit and the finite-sample (online) discretization, and derive scaling laws for the prediction risk that highlight the power-law dependencies on the optimization time, sample size, and model width. Our analysis combines a precise characterization of the associated matrix Riccati differential equation with novel matrix monotonicity arguments to establish convergence guarantees for the infinite-dimensional effective dynamics. Gérard Ben Arous, Murat A. Erdogdu, Nuri Mert Vural, Denny Wu |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2024 | Pruning is Optimal for Learning Sparse Features in High-DimensionsabstractWhile it is commonly observed in practice that pruning networks to a certain level of sparsity can improve the quality of the features, a theoretical explanation of this phenomenon remains elusive. In this work, we investigate this by demonstrating that a broad class of statistical models can be optimally learned using pruned neural networks trained with gradient descent, in high-dimensions. We consider learning both single-index and multi-index models of the form $y = \sigma^*(\boldsymbol{V}^{\top} \boldsymbol{x}) + \epsilon$, where $\sigma^*$ is a degree-$p$ polynomial, and $\boldsymbol{V} \in \mathbbm{R}^{d \times r}$ with $r \ll d$, is the matrix containing relevant model directions. We assume that $\boldsymbol{V}$ satisfies a certain $\ell_q$-sparsity condition for matrices and show that pruning neural networks proportional to the sparsity level of $\boldsymbol{V}$ improves their sample complexity compared to unpruned networks. Furthermore, we establish Correlational Statistical Query (CSQ) lower bounds in this setting, which take the sparsity level of $\boldsymbol{V}$ into account. We show that if the sparsity level of $\boldsymbol{V}$ exceeds a certain threshold, training pruned networks with a gradient descent algorithm achieves the sample complexity suggested by the CSQ lower bound. In the same scenario, however, our results imply that basis-independent methods such as models trained via standard gradient descent initialized with rotationally invariant random weights can provably achieve only suboptimal sample complexity. Nuri Mert Vural, Murat A. Erdogdu |
COLT | 1 |
| 2022 | Mirror Descent Strikes Again: Optimal Stochastic Convex Optimization under Infinite Noise VarianceabstractWe study stochastic convex optimization under infinite noise variance. Specifically, when the stochastic gradient is unbiased and has uniformly bounded $(1+\kappa)$-th moment, for some $\kappa \in (0,1]$, we quantify the convergence rate of the Stochastic Mirror Descent algorithm with a particular class of uniformly convex mirror maps, in terms of the number of iterations, dimensionality and related geometric parameters of the optimization problem. Interestingly this algorithm does not require any explicit gradient clipping or normalization, which have been extensively used in several recent empirical and theoretical works. We complement our convergence results with information-theoretic lower bounds showing that no other algorithm using only stochastic first-order oracles can achieve improved rates. Our results have several interesting consequences for devising online/streaming stochastic approximation algorithms for problems arising in robust statistics and machine learning. Nuri Mert Vural, Krishnakumar Balasubramanian 0002, Stanislav Volgushev, Murat A. Erdogdu |
COLT | 1 |
| 2022 | Achieving Online Regression Performance of LSTMs With Simple RNNsabstractRecurrent neural networks (RNNs) are widely used for online regression due to their ability to generalize nonlinear temporal dependencies. As an RNN model, long short-term memory networks (LSTMs) are commonly preferred in practice, as these networks are capable of learning long-term dependencies while avoiding the vanishing gradient problem. However, due to their large number of parameters, training LSTMs requires considerably longer training time compared to simple RNNs (SRNNs). In this article, we achieve the online regression performance of LSTMs with SRNNs efficiently. To this end, we introduce a first-order training algorithm with a linear time complexity in the number of parameters. We show that when SRNNs are trained with our algorithm, they provide very similar regression performance with the LSTMs in two to three times shorter training time. We provide strong theoretical analysis to support our experimental results by providing regret bounds on the convergence rate of our algorithm. Through an extensive set of experiments, we verify our theoretical work and demonstrate significant performance improvements of our algorithm with respect to LSTMs and the other state-of-the-art learning models. Nuri Mert Vural, Fatih Ilhan, Selim F. Yilmaz, Salih Ergüt, Suleyman Serdar Kozat |
IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst. | 1 |