EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dapeng Hu
dblp:247/3382
· DBLP profile ↗
13ranked-venue papers
6as first author
10since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 12 · 5 first-author · 9 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
12 papers |
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 46% Trustworthy machine learning · 25% Efficient and distributed learning · 7% |
Topics — the 25 heaviest of 28, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
unsupervised domain adaptation |
4.8 | 8 | 2024 | Towards Reliable Model Selection for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation: An Empirical Study and A Certified Baseline · NeurIPS 2024 Pseudo-Calibration: Improving Predictive Uncertainty Estimation in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation · ICML 2024 Mixed Samples as Probes for Unsupervised Model Selection in Domain Adaptation · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
model selection |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Towards Reliable Model Selection for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation: An Empirical Study and A Certified Baseline · NeurIPS 2024 Mixed Samples as Probes for Unsupervised Model Selection in Domain Adaptation · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
calibration |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Pseudo-Calibration: Improving Predictive Uncertainty Estimation in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation · ICML 2024 No Fear of Heterogeneity: Classifier Calibration for Federated Learning with Non-IID Data · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
source-free domain adaptation |
1.2 | 3 | 2024 | Source Data-Absent Unsupervised Domain Adaptation Through Hypothesis Transfer and Labeling Transfer · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation · ICML 2020 Towards Reliable Model Selection for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation: An Empirical Study and A Certified Baseline · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
1.2 | 2 | 2024 | Pseudo-Calibration: Improving Predictive Uncertainty Estimation in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation · ICML 2024 A Balanced and Uncertainty-Aware Approach for Partial Domain Adaptation · ECCV (11) 2020 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | DINE: Domain Adaptation from Single and Multiple Black-box Predictors · CVPR 2022 Unleashing the Power of Contrastive Self-Supervised Visual Models via Contrast-Regularized Fine-Tuning · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
pseudo-labeling |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Domain Adaptation With Auxiliary Target Domain-Oriented Classifier · CVPR 2021 Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
post-hoc calibration |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Pseudo-Calibration: Improving Predictive Uncertainty Estimation in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Reliable Model Selection for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation: An Empirical Study and A Certified Baseline · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
uncertainty calibration |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Pseudo-Calibration: Improving Predictive Uncertainty Estimation in Unsupervised Domain Adaptation · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | How Well Does Self-Supervised Pre-Training Perform with Streaming Data? · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › parameter-based transfer learning
hypothesis transfer learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Source Data-Absent Unsupervised Domain Adaptation Through Hypothesis Transfer and Labeling Transfer · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | DINE: Domain Adaptation from Single and Multiple Black-box Predictors · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
self-supervised representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | How Well Does Self-Supervised Pre-Training Perform with Streaming Data? · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
streaming data |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | How Well Does Self-Supervised Pre-Training Perform with Streaming Data? · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation › distribution adaptation
adversarial domain adaptation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Adversarial Domain Adaptation With Prototype-Based Normalized Output Conditioner · IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › calibration
classifier calibration |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | No Fear of Heterogeneity: Classifier Calibration for Federated Learning with Non-IID Data · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › fine-tuning
contrastive fine-tuning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Unleashing the Power of Contrastive Self-Supervised Visual Models via Contrast-Regularized Fine-Tuning · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Unleashing the Power of Contrastive Self-Supervised Visual Models via Contrast-Regularized Fine-Tuning · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
data heterogeneity |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | No Fear of Heterogeneity: Classifier Calibration for Federated Learning with Non-IID Data · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Domain Adaptation With Auxiliary Target Domain-Oriented Classifier · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | No Fear of Heterogeneity: Classifier Calibration for Federated Learning with Non-IID Data · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation › unsupervised domain adaptation
partial domain adaptation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Balanced and Uncertainty-Aware Approach for Partial Domain Adaptation · ECCV (11) 2020 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation
uncertainty-aware adaptation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Balanced and Uncertainty-Aware Approach for Partial Domain Adaptation · ECCV (11) 2020 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Source Data-Absent Unsupervised Domain Adaptation Through Hypothesis Transfer and Labeling Transfer · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
information maximization · 1.0temperature scaling · 0.8mixup · 0.8hyperparameter selection · 0.8ensemble-based selection · 0.8pseudo labels · 0.7mixed samples · 0.7clustering-based probing · 0.7knowledge distillation · 0.6fine-tuning · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Pseudo-Calibration: Improving Predictive Uncertainty Estimation in Unsupervised Domain AdaptationabstractUnsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) has seen substantial efforts to improve model accuracy for an unlabeled target domain with the help of a labeled source domain. However, UDA models often exhibit poorly calibrated predictive uncertainty on target data, a problem that remains under-explored and poses risks in safety-critical UDA applications. The calibration problem in UDA is particularly challenging due to the absence of labeled target data and severe distribution shifts between domains. In this paper, we approach UDA calibration as a target-domain-specific unsupervised problem, different from mainstream solutions based on *covariate shift*. We introduce Pseudo-Calibration (PseudoCal), a novel post-hoc calibration framework. Our innovative use of inference-stage *mixup* synthesizes a labeled pseudo-target set capturing the structure of the real unlabeled target data. This turns the unsupervised calibration problem into a supervised one, easily solvable with *temperature scaling*. Extensive empirical evaluations across 5 diverse UDA scenarios involving 10 UDA methods consistently demonstrate the superior performance and versatility of PseudoCal over existing solutions. Dapeng Hu, Jian Liang 0001, Xinchao Wang, Chuan-Sheng Foo |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Towards Reliable Model Selection for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation: An Empirical Study and A Certified BaselineabstractSelecting appropriate hyperparameters is crucial for unlocking the full potential of advanced unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) methods in unlabeled target domains. Although this challenge remains under-explored, it has recently garnered increasing attention with the proposals of various model selection methods. Reliable model selection should maintain performance across diverse UDA methods and scenarios, especially avoiding highly risky worst-case selections—selecting the model or hyperparameter with the worst performance in the pool.\textit{Are existing model selection methods reliable and versatile enough for different UDA tasks?} In this paper, we provide a comprehensive empirical study involving 8 existing model selection approaches to answer this question. Our evaluation spans 12 UDA methods across 5 diverse UDA benchmarks and 5 popular UDA scenarios.Surprisingly, we find that none of these approaches can effectively avoid the worst-case selection. In contrast, a simple but overlooked ensemble-based selection approach, which we call EnsV, is both theoretically and empirically certified to avoid the worst-case selection, ensuring high reliability. Additionally, EnsV is versatile for various practical but challenging UDA scenarios, including validation of open-partial-set UDA and source-free UDA.Finally, we call for more attention to the reliability of model selection in UDA: avoiding the worst-case is as significant as achieving peak selection performance and should not be overlooked when developing new model selection methods. Code is available at https://github.com/LHXXHB/EnsV. Dapeng Hu, Romy Luo, Jian Liang 0001, Chuan-Sheng Foo |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2023 | Mixed Samples as Probes for Unsupervised Model Selection in Domain AdaptationabstractUnsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) has been widely applied in improving model generalization on unlabeled target data. However, accurately selecting the best UDA model for the target domain is challenging due to the absence of labeled target data and domain distribution shifts. Traditional model selection approaches involve training extra models with source data to estimate the target validation risk. Recent studies propose practical methods that are based on measuring various properties of model predictions on target data. Although effective for some UDA models, these methods often lack stability and may lead to poor selections for other UDA models.
In this paper, we present MixVal, an innovative model selection method that operates solely with unlabeled target data during inference. MixVal leverages mixed target samples with pseudo labels to directly probe the learned target structure by each UDA model. Specifically, MixVal employs two distinct types of probes: the intra-cluster mixed samples for evaluating neighborhood density and the inter-cluster mixed samples for investigating the classification boundary. With this comprehensive probing strategy, MixVal elegantly combines the strengths of two state-of-the-art model selection methods, Entropy and SND. We extensively evaluate MixVal on 11 UDA methods across 4 adaptation settings, including classification and segmentation tasks. Experimental results consistently demonstrate that MixVal achieves state-of-the-art performance and maintains exceptional stability in model selection.
Code is available at \url{https://github.com/LHXXHB/MixVal}. Dapeng Hu, Jian Liang 0001, Jun Hao Liew, Chuhui Xue, Song Bai 0001, Xinchao Wang |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | DINE: Domain Adaptation from Single and Multiple Black-box PredictorsabstractTo ease the burden of labeling, unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) aims to transfer knowledge in previous and related labeled datasets (sources) to a new unlabeled dataset (target). Despite impressive progress, prior methods always need to access the raw source data and develop data-dependent alignment approaches to recognize the target samples in a transductive learning manner, which may raise privacy concerns from source individuals. Several recent studies resort to an alternative solution by exploiting the well-trained white-box model from the source domain, yet, it may still leak the raw data via generative adversarial learning. This paper studies a practical and interesting setting for UDA, where only black-box source models (i.e., only network predictions are available) are provided during adaptation in the target domain. To solve this problem, we propose a new two-step knowledge adaptation framework called DIstill and fine-tuNE (DINE). Taking into consideration the target data structure, DINE first distills the knowledge from the source predictor to a customized target model, then fine-tunes the distilled model to further fit the target domain. Besides, neural networks are not required to be identical across domains in DINE, even allowing effective adaptation on a low-resource device. Empirical results on three UDA scenarios (i.e., single-source, multisource, and partial-set) confirm that DINE achieves highly competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art data-dependent approaches. Code is available at https://github.com/tim-learn/DINE/. Jian Liang 0001, Dapeng Hu, Jiashi Feng, Ran He 0001 |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2022 | How Well Does Self-Supervised Pre-Training Perform with Streaming Data?
Dapeng Hu, Shipeng Yan, Qizhengqiu Lu, Lanqing Hong, Hailin Hu 0002, Yifan Zhang 0004, Zhenguo Li, Xinchao Wang, Jiashi Feng |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | Source Data-Absent Unsupervised Domain Adaptation Through Hypothesis Transfer and Labeling TransferabstractUnsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) aims to transfer knowledge from a related but different well-labeled source domain to a new unlabeled target domain. Most existing UDA methods require access to the source data, and thus are not applicable when the data are confidential and not shareable due to privacy concerns. This paper aims to tackle a realistic setting with only a classification model available trained over, instead of accessing to, the source data. To effectively utilize the source model for adaptation, we propose a novel approach called Source HypOthesis Transfer (SHOT), which learns the feature extraction module for the target domain by fitting the target data features to the frozen source classification module (representing classification hypothesis). Specifically, SHOT exploits both information maximization and self-supervised learning for the feature extraction module learning to ensure the target features are implicitly aligned with the features of unseen source data via the same hypothesis. Furthermore, we propose a new labeling transfer strategy, which separates the target data into two splits based on the confidence of predictions (labeling information), and then employ semi-supervised learning to improve the accuracy of less-confident predictions in the target domain. We denote labeling transfer as SHOT++ if the predictions are obtained by SHOT. Extensive experiments on both digit classification and object recognition tasks show that SHOT and SHOT++ achieve results surpassing or comparable to the state-of-the-arts, demonstrating the effectiveness of our approaches for various visual domain adaptation problems. Code will be available at https://github.com/tim-learn/SHOT-plus. Jian Liang 0001, Dapeng Hu, Yunbo Wang, Ran He 0001, Jiashi Feng |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2021 | Domain Adaptation With Auxiliary Target Domain-Oriented ClassifierabstractDomain adaptation (DA) aims to transfer knowledge from a label-rich but heterogeneous domain to a label-scare domain, which alleviates the labeling efforts and attracts considerable attention. Different from previous methods focusing on learning domain-invariant feature representations, some recent methods present generic semi-supervised learning (SSL) techniques and directly apply them to DA tasks, even achieving competitive performance. One of the most popular SSL techniques is pseudo-labeling that assigns pseudo labels for each unlabeled data via the classifier trained by labeled data. However, it ignores the distribution shift in DA problems and is inevitably biased to source data. To address this issue, we propose a new pseudo-labeling framework called Auxiliary Target Domain-Oriented Classifier (ATDOC). ATDOC alleviates the classifier bias by introducing an auxiliary classifier for target data only, to improve the quality of pseudo labels. Specifically, we employ the memory mechanism and develop two types of nonparametric classifiers, i.e. the nearest centroid classifier and neighborhood aggregation, without introducing any additional network parameters. Despite its simplicity in a pseudo classification objective, ATDOC with neighborhood aggregation significantly outperforms domain alignment techniques and prior SSL techniques on a large variety of DA benchmarks and even scare-labeled SSL tasks. Jian Liang 0001, Dapeng Hu, Jiashi Feng |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2021 | No Fear of Heterogeneity: Classifier Calibration for Federated Learning with Non-IID DataabstractA central challenge in training classification models in the real-world federated system is learning with non-IID data. To cope with this, most of the existing works involve enforcing regularization in local optimization or improving the model aggregation scheme at the server. Other works also share public datasets or synthesized samples to supplement the training of under-represented classes or introduce a certain level of personalization. Though effective, they lack a deep understanding of how the data heterogeneity affects each layer of a deep classification model. In this paper, we bridge this gap by performing an experimental analysis of the representations learned by different layers. Our observations are surprising: (1) there exists a greater bias in the classifier than other layers, and (2) the classification performance can be significantly improved by post-calibrating the classifier after federated training. Motivated by the above findings, we propose a novel and simple algorithm called Classifier Calibration with Virtual Representations (CCVR), which adjusts the classifier using virtual representations sampled from an approximated gaussian mixture model. Experimental results demonstrate that CCVR achieves state-of-the-art performance on popular federated learning benchmarks including CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and CINIC-10. We hope that our simple yet effective method can shed some light on the future research of federated learning with non-IID data. Mi Luo, Fei Chen 0013, Dapeng Hu, Yifan Zhang 0004, Jian Liang 0001, Jiashi Feng |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2021 | Unleashing the Power of Contrastive Self-Supervised Visual Models via Contrast-Regularized Fine-TuningabstractContrastive self-supervised learning (CSL) has attracted increasing attention for model pre-training via unlabeled data. The resulted CSL models provide instance-discriminative visual features that are uniformly scattered in the feature space. During deployment, the common practice is to directly fine-tune CSL models with cross-entropy, which however may not be the best strategy in practice. Although cross-entropy tends to separate inter-class features, the resulting models still have limited capability for reducing intra-class feature scattering that exists in CSL models. In this paper, we investigate whether applying contrastive learning to fine-tuning would bring further benefits, and analytically find that optimizing the contrastive loss benefits both discriminative representation learning and model optimization during fine-tuning. Inspired by these findings, we propose Contrast-regularized tuning (Core-tuning), a new approach for fine-tuning CSL models. Instead of simply adding the contrastive loss to the objective of fine-tuning, Core-tuning further applies a novel hard pair mining strategy for more effective contrastive fine-tuning, as well as smoothing the decision boundary to better exploit the learned discriminative feature space. Extensive experiments on image classification and semantic segmentation verify the effectiveness of Core-tuning. Yifan Zhang 0004, Bryan Hooi, Dapeng Hu, Jian Liang 0001, Jiashi Feng |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2021 | Adversarial Domain Adaptation With Prototype-Based Normalized Output ConditionerabstractDomain adversarial training has become a prevailing and effective paradigm for unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA). To successfully align the multi-modal data structures across domains, the following works exploit discriminative information in the adversarial training process, e.g., using multiple class-wise discriminators and involving conditional information in the input or output of the domain discriminator. However, these methods either require non-trivial model designs or are inefficient for UDA tasks. In this work, we attempt to address this dilemma by devising simple and compact conditional domain adversarial training methods. We first revisit the simple concatenation conditioning strategy where features are concatenated with output predictions as the input of the discriminator. We find the concatenation strategy suffers from the weak conditioning strength. We further demonstrate that enlarging the norm of concatenated predictions can effectively energize the conditional domain alignment. Thus we improve concatenation conditioning by normalizing the output predictions to have the same norm of features, and term the derived method as Normalized OutpUt coNditioner (NOUN). However, conditioning on raw output predictions for domain alignment, NOUN suffers from inaccurate predictions of the target domain. To this end, we propose to condition the cross-domain feature alignment in the prototype space rather than in the output space. Combining the novel prototype-based conditioning with NOUN, we term the enhanced method as PROtotype-based Normalized OutpUt coNditioner (PRONOUN). Experiments on both object recognition and semantic segmentation show that NOUN can effectively align the multi-modal structures across domains and even outperform state-of-the-art domain adversarial training methods. Together with prototype-based conditioning, PRONOUN further improves the adaptation performance over NOUN on multiple object recognition benchmarks for UDA. Code is available at https://github.com/tim-learn/NOUN. Dapeng Hu, Jian Liang 0001, Qibin Hou, Hanshu Yan, Yunpeng Chen |
IEEE Trans. Image Process. | 1 |
| 2020 | A Balanced and Uncertainty-Aware Approach for Partial Domain Adaptation
Jian Liang 0001, Yunbo Wang, Dapeng Hu, Ran He 0001, Jiashi Feng |
ECCV (11) | 3 |
| 2020 | Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain AdaptationabstractUnsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) aims to leverage the knowledge learned from a labeled source dataset to solve similar tasks in a new unlabeled domain. Prior UDA methods typically require to access the source data when learning to adapt the model, making them risky and inefficient for decentralized private data. This work tackles a practical setting where only a trained source model is available and investigates how we can effectively utilize such a model without source data to solve UDA problems. We propose a simple yet generic representation learning framework, named \emph{Source HypOthesis Transfer} (SHOT). SHOT freezes the classifier module (hypothesis) of the source model and learns the target-specific feature extraction module by exploiting both information maximization and self-supervised pseudo-labeling to implicitly align representations from the target domains to the source hypothesis. To verify its versatility, we evaluate SHOT in a variety of adaptation cases including closed-set, partial-set, and open-set domain adaptation. Experiments indicate that SHOT yields state-of-the-art results among multiple domain adaptation benchmarks. Jian Liang 0001, Dapeng Hu, Jiashi Feng |
ICML | 2 |
| 2019 | State Representation Learning for Minimax Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient
Dapeng Hu, Xuesong Jiang, Xiumei Wei |
KSEM (1) | 1 |