Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Laura Ferrarotti
dblp:247/4490
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 87% Reinforcement learning · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › tree-based interpretability
decision tree distillation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SMoSE: Sparse Mixture of Shallow Experts for Interpretable Reinforcement Learning in Continuous Control Tasks · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
explainable reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | SMoSE: Sparse Mixture of Shallow Experts for Interpretable Reinforcement Learning in Continuous Control Tasks · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
continuous control |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | SMoSE: Sparse Mixture of Shallow Experts for Interpretable Reinforcement Learning in Continuous Control Tasks · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
mixture of experts · 0.9load balancing · 0.9decision tree distillation · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | SMoSE: Sparse Mixture of Shallow Experts for Interpretable Reinforcement Learning in Continuous Control TasksabstractContinuous control tasks often involve high-dimensional, dynamic, and non-linear environments. State-of-the-art performance in these tasks is achieved through complex closed-box policies that are effective, but suffer from an inherent opacity. Interpretable policies, while generally underperforming compared to their closed-box counterparts, advantageously facilitate transparent decision-making within automated systems. Hence, their usage is often essential for diagnosing and mitigating errors, supporting ethical and legal accountability, and fostering trust among stakeholders. In this paper, we propose SMoSE, a novel method to train sparsely activated interpretable controllers, based on a top-1 Mixture-of-Experts architecture. SMoSE combines a set of interpretable decision-makers, trained to be experts in different basic skills, and an interpretable router that assigns tasks among the experts. The training is carried out via state-of-the-art Reinforcement Learning algorithms, exploiting load-balancing techniques to ensure fair expert usage. We then distill decision trees from the weights of the router, significantly improving the ease of interpretation. We evaluate SMoSE on six benchmark environments from MuJoCo: our method outperforms recent interpretable baselines and narrows the gap with non-interpretable state-of-the-art algorithms. Mátyás Vincze, Laura Ferrarotti, Leonardo Lucio Custode, Bruno Lepri, Giovanni Iacca |
AAAI | 2 |