Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David Gwizdala

dblp:247/5771 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics › biological data visualization
biological network visualization
0.612022
Flud: A Hybrid Crowd-Algorithm Approach for Visualizing Biological Networks · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2022
Visualization and visual analytics › graph visualization
graph layout
0.612022
Flud: A Hybrid Crowd-Algorithm Approach for Visualizing Biological Networks · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2022
Collaborative and social computing
crowdsourcing
0.612022
Flud: A Hybrid Crowd-Algorithm Approach for Visualizing Biological Networks · ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulated annealing · 1.1mixed-initiative interaction · 1.1crowd workers · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Flud: A Hybrid Crowd-Algorithm Approach for Visualizing Biological Networks
abstract
Modern experiments in many disciplines generate large quantities of network (graph) data. Researchers require aesthetic layouts of these networks that clearly convey the domain knowledge and meaning. However, the problem remains challenging due to multiple conflicting aesthetic criteria and complex domain-specific constraints. In this article, we present a strategy for generating visualizations that can help network biologists understand the protein interactions that underlie processes that take place in the cell. Specifically, we have developed Flud, a crowd-powered system that allows humans with no expertise to design biologically meaningful graph layouts with the help of algorithmically generated suggestions. Furthermore, we propose a novel hybrid approach for graph layout wherein crowd workers and a simulated annealing algorithm build on each other’s progress. A study of about 2,000 crowd workers on Amazon Mechanical Turk showed that the hybrid crowd–algorithm approach outperforms the crowd-only approach and state-of-the-art techniques when workers were asked to lay out complex networks that represent signaling pathways. Another study of seven participants with biological training showed that Flud layouts are more effective compared to those created by state-of-the-art techniques. We also found that the algorithmically generated suggestions guided the workers when they are stuck and helped them improve their score. Finally, we discuss broader implications for mixed-initiative interactions in layout design tasks beyond biology.
Aditya Bharadwaj, David Gwizdala, Yoonjin Kim, Kurt Luther, T. M. Murali 0001
ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact.2