Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Soham Bonnerjee
dblp:247/5931
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 46% Learning theory · 15% Optimization for machine learning · 15% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › federated learning
decentralized federated learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sharp Gaussian approximations for Decentralized Federated Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
federated learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sharp Gaussian approximations for Decentralized Federated Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › distribution approximation
gaussian approximation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sharp Gaussian approximations for Decentralized Federated Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training › communication-efficient distributed SGD
local SGD |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sharp Gaussian approximations for Decentralized Federated Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical guarantees |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sharp Gaussian approximations for Decentralized Federated Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Sharp Gaussian approximations for Decentralized Federated Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › adversarial machine learning › adversarial defense
adversarial example detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Sharp Gaussian approximations for Decentralized Federated Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Sharp Gaussian approximations for Decentralized Federated Learning · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
multiplier bootstrap · 0.9gaussian approximation · 0.9berry-esseen theorem · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Sharp Gaussian approximations for Decentralized Federated LearningabstractFederated Learning has gained traction in privacy-sensitive collaborative environments, with local SGD emerging as a key optimization method in decentralized settings. While its convergence properties are well-studied, asymptotic statistical guarantees beyond convergence remain limited. In this paper, we present two generalized Gaussian approximation results for local SGD and explore their implications. First, we prove a Berry-Esseen theorem for the final local SGD iterates, enabling valid multiplier bootstrap procedures. Second, motivated by robustness considerations, we introduce two distinct time-uniform Gaussian approximations for the entire trajectory of local SGD. The time-uniform approximations support Gaussian bootstrap-based tests for detecting adversarial attacks. Extensive simulations are provided to support our theoretical results. Soham Bonnerjee, Sayar Karmakar, Wei Biao Wu |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2025 | Asymptotic theory of SGD with a general learning-rateabstractStochastic gradient descent (SGD) with polynomially decaying step‐sizes has long underpinned theoretical analyses, yielding a broad spectrum of statistically attractive guarantees. Yet in practice, such schedules find rare use due to their prohibitively slow convergence, revealing a persistent gap between theory and empirical performance. In this paper, we introduce a unified framework that quantifies the uncertainty of online SGD under arbitrary learning‐rate choices. In particular, we provide the first comprehensive convergence characterizations for two widely used but theoretically under-examined schemes—cyclical learning rates and linear decay to zero. Our results not only explain the observed behavior of these schedules but also facilitate principled tools for statistical inference and algorithm design. All theoretical findings are corroborated by extensive simulations across diverse settings. Or Goldreich, Ziyang Wei, Soham Bonnerjee, Jiaqi Li 0032, Wei Biao Wu |
NeurIPS | 3 |